| Revision as of 20:12, 22 July 2006 editCapit (talk | contribs)117 edits So it does have to do with the high school bias here.← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:23, 22 July 2006 edit undoGoneAwayNowAndRetired (talk | contribs)14,896 edits PRODing wikisNext edit → | ||
| Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
| I did what I was told which was obviously the wrong thing. I don't think your attacks on me make any advice you give to me credible. I am copying this to my page as I have been told to keep a record of what is going on toward me. ] 20:12, 22 July 2006 (UTC) | I did what I was told which was obviously the wrong thing. I don't think your attacks on me make any advice you give to me credible. I am copying this to my page as I have been told to keep a record of what is going on toward me. ] 20:12, 22 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == PRODing wikis == | |||
| I'm just marking them for tagging on a few--I actually only had two more to do, as I'm trying to demonstrate that the WP:WEB for wikis overall are valid to keep, that's all. I'm posting in the WP:WEB thread shortly that I started for discussion. I really do think the notability standards for Wikis are really, really off. It's got nothing to do with ED... or want to comment. Your input on WEB talk would be appreciated. ] 20:23, 22 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:23, 22 July 2006
| This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Dec06. Sections without timestamps are not archived |
User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Jun06
Please comment on plagiarism
Thanks. Here you go. ____G_o_o_d____
User:Capit
I noticed that you pout a suspected sockpuppet of SirIssacBrock notice on Capit's page. Any reason in particular? Metros232 17:08, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Removing comments
Moved to User talk:Hipocrite/devnul, complaining user blocked for harassment. Hipocrite - «Talk» 20:55, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Hello
Hi there! Thanks for your encouraging words. It was nice to read supportive comments, and I'll be sure to remember them moving foward. Thanks again for everything :-) --HappyCamper 03:12, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
restoring a page blanking is not 3rr
kthxbye. SchmuckyTheCat 00:55, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
re: DU
Good find on the WEBCommentary link! - CheNuevara 14:18, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
ED AfD
Please check out the new additions on the talk page. You've been asked there to comment on several options. rootology 15:02, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Your comment requested
I asked this and you didn't answer. What do you think of this article about ED, wikifur's as compared to the various versions at wikipedia? Keep in mind ED bashes furries more than wikipedia. Hardvice 23:36, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Thank you!
Thanks for kind words and help with Dance Portal! Annaxt 14:27, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
another article heavily unsourced/failing
Just wanted to draw your attention to Uncyclopedia. I started to address problems with it on a couple edits, but your eye is more finely tuned for policy vio stuff than mine yet. Would you mind taking a swing at it? I will shortly do more when I have more time. rootology 01:10, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Just got my message from you accusing me of personal attack....
Could you tell me what you are referring to? I attacked someone? Don't you think if you are going to accuse me of something you should tell me more specifically what it is? Capit 18:00, 22 July 2006 (UTC) P.S. Who are you anyway? This doesn't feel like a very friendly place, contrary to all those Misplaced Pages policies. Capit 18:02, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
I resent the personal attack and public banner on my page from you
Below is a copy of the message I sent to a person (I have no idea who he is) who removed the public banner you put on my page, calling me a derogatory name and making accusations. I don't know you either and why you should want to personally attack me and make accusations.
This is my talk page, and an ugly page it is:
NPA
Please see Misplaced Pages's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Hipocrite - «Talk» 02:34, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Sockpuppets are banned users to try to login under a different name. At one point there was a users User:SirIsaacBrock who was very very bad, and annoyed a lot of people. I guess because of your comments on Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Kent-Meridian High School User:Hipocrite has reason to think you were a sockpuppet.
- Sorry that you've had a bad initial reaction. Things will go smoother if you read through some of the policy above, especially Misplaced Pages:Etiquette.
- I'll remove the template, as you comment on Misplaced Pages:Village pump (technical) seems to indicate that your not a sockpuppet (sockpuppets generally know what a sockpuppet is). If you have other problems like this the best place to metion them is WP:ANB --Salix alba (talk) 19:34, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
My reply which I am keeping a record of due to the hostility around here:
First I am told that they are prejudiced against having information about high schools here -- which seems nasty right there.
Next I get a nasty note on my page from someone I do not know. Then I get a banner and I am told I am a sockpuppet by someone (not you). And now your are involved and I have no idea who you or the other persons even are.
I got involved with Misplaced Pages because I was told there was extreme hostitity toward high schools and that it was very necessary for me to vote to defend them. I can only believe that this is true and that my interest in high schools is the reason the guy called User:Hipocrite is attacking me and calling me a sockpuppet, which, I gather, is a slur and an ugly thing to accuss someone of -- not only accuse me but put a big banner on my personal page and publically label me.
This does not engender good feelings in me about Misplaced Pages and I am beginning to understand all the hostility that is around. Capit 19:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- User was able to quote and link policy on their 6th edit , was using insider-terms on their 9th , and knew about their user page on their 5th. Obviously a sock, I suspect SIB given that user becaume abusive following around editors who opposed SIB, but no need for a tag. If this incarnation of whichever user it is ceases all disruptive behavior, they will certainly be welcome here. If user insists on getting involved disruptively on a going forward basis, their tenure will be short. It's their call. Hipocrite - «Talk» 19:56, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- I suggest you stop with the "innocent, ignorant" act, and just make valuable contributions to the encyclopedia. Hipocrite - «Talk» 20:03, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
So it does have to do with the high school bias here.
So what I was told was true. I'm not sure what those links are supposed to illustrate but assume something negative. I did what another person told me to do about the the Kent High School thing, because, believe me, I don't know anything about that high school.
I did what I was told which was obviously the wrong thing. I don't think your attacks on me make any advice you give to me credible. I am copying this to my page as I have been told to keep a record of what is going on toward me. Capit 20:12, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
PRODing wikis
I'm just marking them for tagging on a few--I actually only had two more to do, as I'm trying to demonstrate that the WP:WEB for wikis overall are valid to keep, that's all. I'm posting in the WP:WEB thread shortly that I started for discussion. I really do think the notability standards for Wikis are really, really off. It's got nothing to do with ED... this is the link if you're curious or want to comment. Your input on WEB talk would be appreciated. rootology 20:23, 22 July 2006 (UTC)