Misplaced Pages

:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Newsroom: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:48, 21 March 2015 editResident Mario (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,332 edits Article status← Previous edit Revision as of 01:48, 21 March 2015 edit undoResident Mario (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,332 edits Article status: fixNext edit →
Line 140: Line 140:
::Shit. ] (]) 01:02, 21 March 2015 (UTC) ::Shit. ] (]) 01:02, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
:::::Sorry, ear infection knocked me out. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">''']''' <sup>(])</sup></span> 01:45, 21 March 2015 (UTC) :::::Sorry, ear infection knocked me out. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">''']''' <sup>(])</sup></span> 01:45, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Jonsey95}}: This is because all ''Signpost'' stories and drafts implement the <code><nowiki>__NOEDITSECTION__</nowiki></code> magic word, which removes section links. This is done because we don't encourage post-publication edits to ''Signpost'' stories, and since we don't want to force people to have to embed that into the article after drafting drafts don't get edit links either. We have a template for edit conflicts that's effectively never seen use. It would be a good idea to implement a warning into the draft template that's autogenerated at the tops of drafts. I think we've discussed the problem of edit conflicts before but it's just never happened enough to justify the effort we'd need to make to manage them... <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="#333" size="2">]</font></b><font color="#444" size="2">]</font></span> 01:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC) :::{{ping|Jonesey95}}: This is because all ''Signpost'' stories and drafts implement the <code><nowiki>__NOEDITSECTION__</nowiki></code> magic word, which removes section links. This is done because we don't encourage post-publication edits to ''Signpost'' stories, and since we don't want to force people to have to embed that into the article after drafting drafts don't get edit links either. We have a template for edit conflicts that's effectively never seen use. It would be a good idea to implement a warning into the draft template that's autogenerated at the tops of drafts. I think we've discussed the problem of edit conflicts before but it's just never happened enough to justify the effort we'd need to make to manage them... <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="#333" size="2">]</font></b><font color="#444" size="2">]</font></span> 01:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
:::{{edit conflict}} Eating my words here. <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="#333" size="2">]</font></b><font color="#444" size="2">]</font></span> 01:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC) :::{{edit conflict}} Eating my words here. <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="#333" size="2">]</font></b><font color="#444" size="2">]</font></span> 01:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
|Task9= Arbitration report |Task9= Arbitration report

Revision as of 01:48, 21 March 2015

The Signpost
← Current issueWP:POST/NNewsroom


Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Navigation

Next issue: Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Issue/Next, 2015

Submission deadline: Error: first parameter cannot be parsed as a date or time.!  Publication scheduled for late Wednesday.
Once all tasks are complete, editors-in-chief Gamaliel, Go Phightins!, or publication manager Pine will complete the publication process.


Notices for contributors and interested editors

  • Interested in Signpost matters? Have a concern to share? Possibly want to become a regular or irregular contributor? Try finding us on IRC at #wikisignpost , the best way for Signpost writers to connect. Or, use the talk page. To learn more about how we operate, see our content guidance page.
  • Got a news tip to share? Send it down our grapevine.
  • Interested in contributing an irregular article or a special column, such as an interviews, op-ed, or special report, to the Signpost? Great! See our content guidelines for more details, and submission instructions from there.
  • Interested in joining the Signpost full-time? Superlative! See our content guidelines for more details on positions and openings.
  • Our current standard weekly schedule:
  • Thursday–Sunday: start. Start all pages that are to be included in the next edition, either on-wiki or in Google Docs. Please note that "News and notes", "In the media", and the "Arbitration report" are typically drafted in the latter, but suggestions for them are always welcome through our suggestions page. Note that Featured content, due to using a weekly schedule based on WP:GO, will not have a finalized content list until the Sunday (UTC) starts, and will thus usually be a little bit behind the others at this point.
  • Monday: draft. A rough outline of topics to be covered should be in place by the middle of Monday, so that if a regular reporter is unavailable, the editor can find a replacement for that week.
  • Tuesday, early Wednesday: mature versions. Aim to have reasonably mature drafts of all pages for comments by the managing editors, fellow journalists, and other interested editors. Signpost editors recommend any structural changes, reductions in length, expansions in scope, necessary coordination between pages, postponement to subsequent issue.
  • Wednesday: finish! Last-minute tweaks and copy-editors go through the drafts; publication in the evening. However, due to its prominent position at Portal:Featured content, the Signpost cannot publish if every single section of the Featured Content report isn't finished, and this section can't even really be started until Sunday mornings. Please pitch in if Featured Content is falling behind.

Current discussion

Ideas for Signpost features can be pitched and discussed by any interested parties here. Items should be listed directly at the opinion desk or the special desk, submissions from which are automatically transcluded here.

From the opinion desk

The following proposals have been transcluded from the opinion desk.

Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Newsroom/Opinion desk

From the special desk

The following proposals have been transcluded from the special desk.

Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Newsroom/Special desk

Other proposals

This space is for irregular reports which do not belong to categories above.


The following proposals have been transcluded from the review desk.



The following proposals have been transcluded from the dispatch workshop.




Ideas

This space is for editors sharing internal ideas about topics or issues the Signpost should focus on or find writers to address, but for which reports or proposals have not yet been drafted. Items here are automatically transcluded to the opinion and special desks so that contributing editors may be aware of our current editorial focus.


  • Gender ratio: This month is WikiWoman's month and a lot of scrutiny is being placed across the project on the gender gap. We will summarize the state of play in our end-of-March issue, with a special report on the gender ratio currently in draft.
  • Copyright: How overly strict copyright limits are hurting Wikimedia contributors? Alternatively, how Wikimedia contributors' copyrights are violated on a daily basis?
  • Resource exchange: An interview with the people who help content creators at the Resource Exchange.
  • Public release I've seen a couple of stories about major releases of materials into the Creative Commons of large numbers of literary and scholarly works in the languages of India, specifically Kannada and Tamil, thanks to the efforts of Wikipedians. Perhaps a talk with some of the participants or an overview of these kinds of efforts?
  • Wikimedia Ukraine: Possible follow-up with Wikimedia Ukraine on editing WP in the midst of war? (see previous coverage)
  • Guerrilla Skepticism: Guerrilla Skepticism on Misplaced Pages is still a hot topic amongst proponents of alternative medicine and science. This seems ripe for a news feature or perhaps an interview with Susan Gerbic.


Note from editor(s)-in-chief

We're having some technical difficulties but we are mostly published. Thanks to everyone and a great job this week. Gamaliel (talk) 20:12, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Seconding Gamaliel here. Great work, folks. Go Phightins! 01:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

FC is having a manpower shortage, so go help if you can, and it looks like we'll publish Thursday. Gamaliel (talk) 22:26, 18 March 2015 (UTC) Friday Gamaliel (talk) 02:07, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Article status

Irregular articles

See current proposals Add irregular article

Op-ed

In progress
Check status

News and notes

Done
Check status

Publishable after copy-edit, add other items as they appear leading up to deadline. ResMar 00:05, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Covering the outgoing CTCO has made this section quite chunky this week...again. Heh. ResMar 02:30, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Approved for publication. Go Phightins! 20:55, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

In the media

Needs copyedit
Check status This will be done tonight. It's pretty long, so eyes for stray errors would be appreciated. Gamaliel (talk) 04:13, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Discussion report

Not started

WikiProject report

Not started

Featured content

Done

Will copyedit this and set up this next one tomorrow.

Sounds good. Thanks, Adam. Go Phightins! 00:29, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

@Adam Cuerden: @Xanthomelanoussprog: @Hafspajen: @Crisco 1492: @WPPilot: @Jonesey95: Can someone give us an update in the next few hours about when this will be finished? Thank you. Gamaliel (talk) 16:07, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

It's not ready for copy-editing. I'll be happy to copy-edit when it is ready. I have added it to my watchlist. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:38, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Most or all of the guff is in; needs links to authors and articles added. Xanthomelanoussprog (talk) 18:58, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
We're going to publish at midnight UTC. If they aren't in by then we will publish as is. Gamaliel (talk) 19:50, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
This section ought to be scripted. How do you extract featured bits right now? Copy-paste and then format? ResMar 20:49, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Yes (groan) I'm stopping- got a painful shoulder. Xanthomelanoussprog (talk) 21:16, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Going to have to add doing something about that to the to-do list. WP:GO is updated manually, as well, holy smokes... ResMar 22:26, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Hafspajen and I are running into edit conflicts while trying to whip this thing into shape. It would be easier if there were section edit links so that we could work on separate sections, but I do not see any. Does anyone know why I don't see section edit links on this page? I see them on all other pages, obviously. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:42, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Appart from minor flaws ready. Hafspajen (talk) 00:40, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Hafspajen: Well done! Still needs fixing: "from through " and "TKTKTK". I will proceed with copy edits. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:53, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Shit. Hafspajen (talk) 01:02, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, ear infection knocked me out. Adam Cuerden 01:45, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
@Jonesey95:: This is because all Signpost stories and drafts implement the __NOEDITSECTION__ magic word, which removes section links. This is done because we don't encourage post-publication edits to Signpost stories, and since we don't want to force people to have to embed that into the article after drafting drafts don't get edit links either. We have a template for edit conflicts that's effectively never seen use. It would be a good idea to implement a warning into the draft template that's autogenerated at the tops of drafts. I think we've discussed the problem of edit conflicts before but it's just never happened enough to justify the effort we'd need to make to manage them... ResMar 01:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Eating my words here. ResMar 01:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration report

Not started

Not going to have time this week due to a combination of Misplaced Pages and RL things, and there's not much going on at the minute. I'll see if I can poke someone for an interview for next week or the week after to liven things up. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:42, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

No worries. Thanks for checking in, HJ. Go Phightins! 00:29, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Traffic report

Done
This looks ready to go. Gamaliel (talk) 15:22, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Technology report

Not started

Gallery

Not started

Blog

Not started

From the editor

Needs discussion

Per email discussion with Gamaliel. Re dept. Go Phightins! 01:34, 13 March 2015 (UTC)


Regular responsibilities

In addition to once-off and irregular features contributed on an ad hoc basis, the Signpost has a number of regular reports (published on a weekly, biweekly, or monthly basis) for which experienced contributors tend to claim responsibility. This responsibility entails ensuring the report in question is consistently well-written and submitted before deadline, which in turn involves selecting the stories to be covered, managing the writing of the report (often contributing most of the content themselves, or recruiting other reporters to do so), and communicating with the newsroom to keep editors informed of developments. While all articles are subject to final review by the editor-in-chief (or managing editors), the regular reporter of a feature typically determines its direction and focus.

The Signpost is always looking for new reporters, so if you are interested in contributing to a given feature, contact the reporter listed as responsible for it below, add yourself to the "Contributors" column of the feature, or simply go right ahead and edit the draft article. If there is no reporter listed as responsible for a given feature, interested editors with experience contributing to the report and who feel up to the task can assume responsibility for it. If a regular reporter is unavailable or no draft for the next issue is listed above, any editor should feel free to write it that week.

Feature Lead editor(s) Contributors Notes
News and notes Resident Mario The ed17, Tony1
In the media Gamaliel Jayen466, Peaceray Normally drafted in a Google Drive doc.
WikiProject report (open) Rcsprinter123 (on break), Buffbills7701, Mabeenot Coordinated at the WikiProject desk
Discussion report (open) Rexford
Featured content Adam Cuerden Hafspajen, Xanthomelanoussprog, WPPilot, Pine, The Herald, Ian Rose and Dank All are welcome. Can get a little silly at times.
Arbitration report Harry Mitchell
Technology report (open) Jarry1250, Edokter, Rcsprinter123 and Godisgood737
Traffic report Serendipodous, Milowent A collaboration with Misplaced Pages:Top25Report
Opinion essays The ed17 N/A Coordinated at the Opinion desk
Recent research Tbayer (HaeB) and DarTar Coordinated at the Wikimedia Research Newsletter desk (last issue of each month)
Task User Backup
Editors-in-chief Gamaliel and Go Phightins! Associate editor: Resident Mario
Publication and newsroom manager Pine The ed17, Jarry1250, Tony1, HaeB (technical advice)
Editor emeritus The ed17
Communications and social media coordinator The ed17 and Go Phightins! Pine, Tony1, Gamaliel
Talkpage deliveries Special:MassMessage Publication tool engineer is Jarry1250
Designer Resident Mario Ebe123, Matthewrbowker, Pretzels
Copy-editing team Graham87, Wavelength, (open)
Get the latest headlines on your user page – just add {{Signpost-subscription}}. Home About Archives Newsroom Subscribe Suggestions
Category: