Revision as of 01:48, 21 March 2015 editResident Mario (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,332 edits →Article status← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:48, 21 March 2015 edit undoResident Mario (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,332 edits →Article status: fixNext edit → | ||
Line 140: | Line 140: | ||
::Shit. ] (]) 01:02, 21 March 2015 (UTC) | ::Shit. ] (]) 01:02, 21 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::::Sorry, ear infection knocked me out. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">''']''' <sup>(])</sup></span> 01:45, 21 March 2015 (UTC) | :::::Sorry, ear infection knocked me out. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">''']''' <sup>(])</sup></span> 01:45, 21 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::{{ping| |
:::{{ping|Jonesey95}}: This is because all ''Signpost'' stories and drafts implement the <code><nowiki>__NOEDITSECTION__</nowiki></code> magic word, which removes section links. This is done because we don't encourage post-publication edits to ''Signpost'' stories, and since we don't want to force people to have to embed that into the article after drafting drafts don't get edit links either. We have a template for edit conflicts that's effectively never seen use. It would be a good idea to implement a warning into the draft template that's autogenerated at the tops of drafts. I think we've discussed the problem of edit conflicts before but it's just never happened enough to justify the effort we'd need to make to manage them... <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="#333" size="2">]</font></b><font color="#444" size="2">]</font></span> 01:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::{{edit conflict}} Eating my words here. <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="#333" size="2">]</font></b><font color="#444" size="2">]</font></span> 01:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC) | :::{{edit conflict}} Eating my words here. <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="#333" size="2">]</font></b><font color="#444" size="2">]</font></span> 01:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
|Task9= Arbitration report | |Task9= Arbitration report |
Revision as of 01:48, 21 March 2015
← Current issueWP:POST/NNewsroom
Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Navigation Next issue: Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Issue/Next, 2015Submission deadline: Error: first parameter cannot be parsed as a date or time.! Publication scheduled for late Wednesday. Notices for contributors and interested editors
Current discussionIdeas for Signpost features can be pitched and discussed by any interested parties here. Items should be listed directly at the opinion desk or the special desk, submissions from which are automatically transcluded here.From the opinion deskThe following proposals have been transcluded from the opinion desk.Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Newsroom/Opinion desk From the special deskThe following proposals have been transcluded from the special desk.Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Newsroom/Special desk Other proposalsThis space is for irregular reports which do not belong to categories above.
IdeasThis space is for editors sharing internal ideas about topics or issues the Signpost should focus on or find writers to address, but for which reports or proposals have not yet been drafted. Items here are automatically transcluded to the opinion and special desks so that contributing editors may be aware of our current editorial focus.
Note from editor(s)-in-chiefWe're having some technical difficulties but we are mostly published. Thanks to everyone and a great job this week. Gamaliel (talk) 20:12, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
FC is having a manpower shortage, so go help if you can, and it looks like we'll publish Article status
Regular responsibilitiesIn addition to once-off and irregular features contributed on an ad hoc basis, the Signpost has a number of regular reports (published on a weekly, biweekly, or monthly basis) for which experienced contributors tend to claim responsibility. This responsibility entails ensuring the report in question is consistently well-written and submitted before deadline, which in turn involves selecting the stories to be covered, managing the writing of the report (often contributing most of the content themselves, or recruiting other reporters to do so), and communicating with the newsroom to keep editors informed of developments. While all articles are subject to final review by the editor-in-chief (or managing editors), the regular reporter of a feature typically determines its direction and focus. The Signpost is always looking for new reporters, so if you are interested in contributing to a given feature, contact the reporter listed as responsible for it below, add yourself to the "Contributors" column of the feature, or simply go right ahead and edit the draft article. If there is no reporter listed as responsible for a given feature, interested editors with experience contributing to the report and who feel up to the task can assume responsibility for it. If a regular reporter is unavailable or no draft for the next issue is listed above, any editor should feel free to write it that week.
|