Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 18:21, 22 March 2015

• WP:CFDS

Categories may be listed for speedy renaming or speedy merging if they meet one or more of the criteria specified below. They must be tagged with {{subst:cfr-speedy|New name}} so that users of the categories are aware of the proposal. A request may be processed 48 hours after it was listed if there are no objections. This delay allows other editors to review the request to ensure that it meets the criteria for speedy deletion, renaming, or merging, and to raise objections to the proposed change.

Categories that qualify for speedy deletion (per Misplaced Pages:Criteria for speedy deletion, e.g. "patent nonsense", "recreation", categories that have been empty for four days) can be tagged with the regular speedy tags, such as {{db|reason}}, and no delay is required to process these. Renaming under C2E can also be processed instantly as it is a variation on G7.

Contested requests become stale, and can be un-tagged and de-listed, after 7 days of inactivity. Optionally, if the discussion may be useful for future reference, it may be copied to the category talk page, with a section heading and {{moved discussion from|]|2=~~~~}}. If the nominator wants to continue the process, s/he needs to submit the request as a regular CfD in accordance with the instructions there.

Speedy criteria

The category-specific criteria for speedy deletion, renaming, or merging are strictly limited to:

This page documents an English Misplaced Pages policy.It describes a widely accepted standard that editors should normally follow, though exceptions may apply. Changes made to it should reflect consensus.

Shortcuts WP:CSD WP:SPEEDY

This page in a nutshell: Under certain limited conditions, a page may be deleted by an administrator without waiting for any discussion.

The criteria for speedy deletion (CSD) specify the only cases in which administrators have broad consensus to bypass deletion discussion, at their discretion, and immediately delete Misplaced Pages pages or media. Because deletion is reversible only by administrators, other deletions occur only after discussion, unless they are proposed deletions. Speedy deletion is intended to reduce the time spent on deletion discussions for pages or media with no practical chance of surviving discussion. Anyone can request speedy deletion by adding one of the speedy deletion templates, but only administrators may actually delete.

Before nominating a page for speedy deletion, consider whether it could be improved, reduced to a stub, merged or redirected elsewhere, reverted to a better previous revision, or handled in some other way (see Misplaced Pages:Deletion policy § Alternatives to deletion). A page is eligible for speedy deletion only if all of its history is also eligible. Users nominating a page for speedy deletion should specify which criterion/criteria the page meets, and should notify the page creator and any major contributors. If a page needs to be removed from Misplaced Pages for privacy reasons (e.g. non-public personal information, a child disclosing their age, possible libel), request oversight instead.

For most speedy deletion criteria, the creator of a page may not remove the deletion tag from it; only an editor who is not the creator of a page may do so. A creator who disagrees with the speedy deletion should instead click on the Contest this speedy deletion button that appears inside of the speedy deletion tag. This button links to the discussion page with a pre-formatted area for the creator to explain why the page should not be deleted. If an editor other than the creator removes a speedy deletion tag in good faith, it should be taken as a sign that the deletion is controversial and another deletion process should be used. The creator of a page may remove a speedy deletion tag only if the criterion in question is G6, G7, G8, G13, G14, C1, C4, or U1.

Administrators should take care not to speedily delete pages or media except in the most obvious cases. If a page has survived its most recent deletion discussion, it should not be speedily deleted except for newly discovered copyright violations and pages that meet specific uncontroversial criteria; these criteria are noted below. Contributors sometimes create pages over several edits, so administrators should avoid deleting a page that appears incomplete too soon after its creation.

Besides speedy deletion, there are the following methods of deletion:

• Misplaced Pages:Deletion discussions (AfD, CfD, FfD, MfD, RfD, TfD), the normal method of carrying out deletion.
• Misplaced Pages:Proposed deletions, for nominating articles and files for uncontroversial deletion.
• Misplaced Pages:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people, for articles on living persons without sources.

Nomenclature

Letter-number abbreviations (G12, A3...) are often used to refer to these criteria, and are given in each section. For example, "CSD G12" refers to criterion 12 under general (copyright infringement) and "CSD U1" refers to criterion 1 under user (user request). Some in-between numbers are skipped, as abbreviations denoting obsolete criteria remain unused. These abbreviations can be confusing to new editors or anyone else unfamiliar with this page; in many situations a plain-English explanation of why a specific page was or should be deleted is preferable.

Requesting speedy deletion

Immediately following each criterion below is a list of templates used to mark pages or media files for speedy deletion under the criterion being used. To alert administrators to the nomination, place the relevant speedy deletion template at the top of the page or media file you are nominating (but see § Pages that need to be tagged in a special manner below). Please be sure to supply an edit summary that mentions that the page is being nominated for speedy deletion. All of the speedy deletion templates are named as Db-X with Db standing for 'delete because'. A list of the Db-X templates can be found at Misplaced Pages:Criteria for speedy deletion/Deletion templates.

If a page falls under more than one of the criteria, instead of adding multiple tags it is possible to add a single {{Db-multiple}} tag to cover them all. For example, if an article seems both to be blatantly promotional (G11) and also to fail to indicate the significance of its subject (A7) then the tag {{Db-multiple|G11|A7}} can be used to indicate both of these concerns. The article can then be speedily deleted if an administrator assesses it and decides that either or both of the criteria apply.

There is a strong consensus that the creators and major contributors of pages and media files should be warned of a speedy deletion nomination (or of the deletion if not informed before). All speedy deletion templates (using criteria other than U1, G5, G6, G7, and G8) thus contain in their body a pre-formatted, suggested warning template to notify the relevant party or parties of the nomination for speedy deletion under the criterion used. You can copy and paste such warnings to the talk pages of the creators and major contributors, choose from others listed at Category:Speedy deletion warning templates, or place the unified warning template, {{subst:CSD-warn|csd|Page name}}, which allows you to tailor your warning under any particular criterion by replacing csd with the associated criterion abbreviation (e.g. g4, a7).

Use common sense when applying a speedy deletion request to a page: review the page history to make sure that all earlier revisions of the page meet the speedy deletion criterion, because a single editor can replace an article with material that appears to cause the page to meet one or more of the criteria.

Pages that need to be tagged in a special manner

Some pages either cannot or should not be tagged for speedy deletion in the normal manner:

• Pages that you cannot edit (e.g., due to protection), or JSON pages: place the template on the corresponding Talk page instead, along with an explanation of which page to delete.
• Template: pages: place the template within a noinclude tag, like this: <noinclude>{{Db-x}}</noinclude>
• Module: pages (except for /doc pages): place the template with Module:Module wikitext, like this: require('Module:Module wikitext')._addText('{{Db-x}}')
• CSS (including sanitized CSS) or JavaScript pages: place the template in a comment, like this: /* {{Db-x}} */

Pages that have survived deletion discussions

As an exception to the norm that a page surviving its most recent deletion discussion means that it should not be speedily deleted, the following criteria apply also to those pages, with or without any specified limitations:

• § G5. Creations by banned or blocked users, or in violation of general sanctions – subject to the strict condition that the XfD participants were unaware that the page would have met this criterion
• § G6. Technical deletions – only if the deletion is temporary, or if no actual content will be removed
• § G8. Pages dependent on a non-existent or deleted page
• § G9. Office actions
• § G12. Unambiguous copyright infringement
• § G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions – if 6 months have passed since the deletion discussion and any subsequent human edits
• § F8. Files available as identical copies on Wikimedia Commons – if the image did not exist on Commons at the time of the FfD
• § F9. Unambiguous copyright infringement
• § U1. User request

These criteria may only be used in such cases when no controversy exists; in the event of a dispute, start a new deletion discussion. However, newly discovered copyright violations should be tagged for G12 if the violation existed in all previous revisions of the article. G5 may be also used at discretion, subject to meeting the criterion outlined above.

General

• WP:GCSD

These apply to every type of page with exclusions listed for specific criteria, and so apply to articles, drafts, redirects, user pages, talk pages, files, etc. Read the specifics for each criterion to see where and how they apply.

G1. Patent nonsense

• WP:G1

This applies to pages consisting entirely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history. It does not cover poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, implausible theories, vandalism, hoaxes, fictional material, coherent non-English material, or poorly translated material. In short, if it is understandable, G1 does not apply. It also does not apply to pages in the user namespace.

• {{Db-g1}}, {{Db-nonsense}}
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as nonsense pages (0)

G2. Test pages

• WP:G2

This applies to pages created to test editing or other Misplaced Pages functions. It applies to subpages of the Misplaced Pages Sandbox created as tests, but does not apply to the Sandbox itself, pages in the user namespace, or valid but unused or duplicate templates.

• {{Db-g2}}, {{Db-test}}
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as test pages (1)

G3. Pure vandalism and blatant hoaxes

• WP:G3

This applies to pages that are blatant and obvious misinformation, blatant hoaxes (including files intended to misinform), and redirects created by cleanup from page-move vandalism. Articles about notable hoaxes are acceptable if it is clear that they are describing a hoax.

• {{Db-g3}}, {{Db-vandalism}} – for vandalism
• {{Db-hoax}} – for hoaxes
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as vandalism (0), Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as hoaxes (0)

G4. Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion

• WP:G4

This applies to sufficiently identical copies, having any title, of a page deleted via its most recent deletion discussion. It excludes pages that are not substantially identical to the deleted version, and pages to which the reason for the deletion no longer applies. It excludes pages in userspace and draftspace where the content was converted to a draft for explicit improvement (but not simply to circumvent Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). This criterion also does not cover content undeleted via a deletion review, or that was only deleted via proposed deletion (including deletion discussions closed as "soft delete") or speedy deletion.

• {{Db-g4}}, {{Db-repost}}
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as pages previously deleted via deletion discussion (0)

G5. Creations by banned or blocked users, or in violation of general sanctions

• WP:G5

This applies to pages created by banned or blocked users in violation of their ban or block, as well as pages created in violation of general sanctions, and that have no substantial edits by others not subject to the ban or sanctions.

• To qualify for a ban- or block-based speedy deletion, the edit or page must have been made while the user was actually banned or blocked. A page created before the ban or block was imposed or after it was lifted will not qualify under this criterion.
• For topic-banned editors, the page must be a violation of the user's specific ban, and must not include contributions legitimately about some other topic.
• For general sanctions, the page must have been created in violation of creation restrictions, such as the extended confirmed restriction, and the remedies must specifically permit deletion as an enforcement measure.
• When a blocked or banned person uses an alternate account (sockpuppet) to avoid a restriction, any pages created via the sock account after the earliest block or ban of any of that person's accounts qualify for G5 (if not substantially edited by others); this is the most common case for applying G5.
• G5 should not be applied to transcluded templates or populated categories unless they have been transcluded or populated entirely by the banned or blocked user; these edits need to be reverted before deletion.
• {{Db-g5|name of banned user}}, {{Db-banned|name of banned user}}, {{Db-gs|contentious topic code}}
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as having been created by blocked or banned users (2), Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as having been created in violation of general sanctions (0)

G6. Technical deletions

• WP:G6

This is for uncontroversial maintenance, including:

• Deleting redirects or other pages which prevent page moves. Administrators should be aware of the proper procedures where a redirect or page holding up a page move has a non-trivial page history. An administrator who deletes a page that is blocking a move should ensure that the move is completed after deleting it.
• Deleting pages unambiguously created in error or in the incorrect namespace, or redirects created by moving away from a title that was obviously unintended.
• Deleting templates orphaned as the result of a consensus at Misplaced Pages:Templates for discussion.

• {{Db-g6|rationale=reason}} – If none of the special tags below applies, this tag should be used with a reason specified in the |rationale= parameter.
• {{Db-copypaste|page to be moved}} – for cut-and-paste page moves that need to be temporarily deleted to make room for a clean page move.
• {{Db-move|page to be moved|reason}} – for pages that are currently holding up a non-controversial or consensual page move.
• {{Db-moved}} – for pages that were holding up a page move, until they were moved out of the way by a page mover.
• {{Db-afc-move|Draft:page to be moved}} – for pages that are currently holding up a non-controversial or consensual page move as a result of an Articles for creation (AFC) review, typically for articles in draft space.
• {{Db-xfd|fullvotepage=link to closed deletion discussion}} – for pages where a consensus to delete has been previously reached via deletion discussion, but which were not deleted.
• {{Db-error}} – for pages obviously created in error.
• Category:Candidates for technical speedy deletion (1)

G7. Author requests deletion

• WP:G7

If requested in good faith and provided that the only substantial content of the page was added by its author. For redirects created as a result of a page move, the mover must also have been the only substantive contributor to the pages before the move. If the sole author blanks a page other than a userspace page, a category page, or any type of talk page, this can be taken as a deletion request. If an author requests deletion of a page currently undergoing a deletion discussion, the closing admin may interpret that request as agreement with the deletion rationale.

• {{Db-g7}}, {{Db-author}}, {{Db-blanked}}, {{Db-self}}
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion by user (1) (same category as U1)

G8. Pages dependent on a non-existent or deleted page

• WP:G8

Examples include, but are not limited to:

• Talk pages with no corresponding subject page
• Subpages with no parent page
• TimedText pages without a corresponding file (or when the file has been moved to Commons)
• Redirects to target pages that never existed or were deleted
• Editnotices of non-existent or unsalted deleted pages

This criterion excludes any page that is useful to Misplaced Pages, and in particular:

• Deletion discussions that are not logged elsewhere
• User talk pages
• Talk page archives (except article talk page archives where the corresponding article and main talk page have been deleted and the page is not otherwise useful to Misplaced Pages – check for page-moves and merges before using G8 on article-talk-page-archives; the parent article might still exist under a different name)
• Redirects that were broken as a result of a page move or retargeting (these should instead be retargeted to their target's new name), except where R2 speedy deletion would then immediately apply if they were fixed (e.g., redirects to articles that have been draftified)
• Plausible redirects that can be changed to valid targets
• User subpages
• Talk pages for files that exist on Wikimedia Commons
• Pages that should be moved to a different location

Exceptions may be sign-posted with the template {{G8-exempt}}.

• {{Db-g8}} – for cases not covered by any of the special tags below
• {{Db-redirnone}} – for pages that redirect to nonexistent/deleted pages, or pages currently flagged for speedy deletion
• {{Db-subpage}} – for subpages of nonexistent/deleted pages, or pages currently flagged for speedy deletion
• {{Db-talk}} – for talk pages of nonexistent/deleted pages, or pages currently flagged for speedy deletion
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as dependent on a non-existent page (1), Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as broken redirects (0)

G9. Office actions

• WP:G9

In exceptional circumstances, the Wikimedia Foundation office reserves the right to speedy-delete a page. Deletions of this type must not be reversed without permission from the Foundation.

G10. Pages that disparage, threaten, intimidate, or harass their subject or some other entity, and serve no other purpose

• WP:G10

Examples of "attack pages" may include: libel, legal threats, material intended purely to harass or intimidate a person, or biographical material about a living person that is entirely negative in tone and unsourced. These pages should be speedily deleted when there is no neutral version in the page history to revert to. Both the page title and page content may be taken into account in assessing an attack. Articles about living people deleted under this criterion should not be restored or recreated by any editor until the biographical article standards are met. Other pages violating the Biographies of living persons policy might be eligible for deletion under the conditions stipulated at Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons § Summary deletion, creation prevention, and courtesy blanking, although in most cases a deletion discussion should be initiated instead.

Redirects from plausible search terms are not eligible under this criterion. For example, a term used on the target page to refer to its subject is often a plausible redirect – see Misplaced Pages:RNEUTRAL.

• {{Db-g10}}, {{Db-attack}}, {{Db-attackorg}}, {{Db-personal attack}}
• {{Db-negublp}} – for articles about living persons that are unsourced, entirely negative in tone, and have no neutral version to revert to
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages (0)

G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion

• WP:G11

This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to serve as encyclopedia articles, rather than advertisements. If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced with text written from a neutral point of view, this is preferable to deletion. Note: Any article that describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion. However, "promotion" does not necessarily mean commercial promotion: anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc.

• {{Db-g11}}, {{Db-promo}}, {{Db-spam}}
• {{Db-spamuser}} – for userpages used only for publicity and promotion, with a username that promotes or implies affiliation with the entity being promoted
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as spam (1)

G12. Unambiguous copyright infringement

• WP:G12

This applies to text pages that contain copyrighted material with no credible assertion of public domain, fair use, or a compatible free license, where there is no non-infringing content on the page worth saving. Only if the history is unsalvageably corrupted should it be deleted in its entirety; earlier versions without infringement should be retained. For equivocal cases that do not meet speedy deletion criteria (such as where there is a dubious assertion of permission, where free-content edits overlie the infringement, or where there is only partial infringement or close paraphrasing), the article or the appropriate section should be blanked with {{subst:Copyvio|url=insert URL here}}, and the page should be listed at Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems. Please consult Misplaced Pages:Copyright violations for other instructions. Public-domain and other free content, such as a Misplaced Pages mirror, do not fall under this criterion, nor is mere lack of attribution of such works a reason for speedy deletion. For images and media, see the equivalent criterion in the "Files" section here, which has more specific instructions.

• {{Db-g12|url=source URL}}, {{Db-copyvio|url=source URL}}

Note: If other criteria apply in addition to G12, the template {{Db-multiple}} should be used instead, so we do not waste time seeking copyright permission after deleting the page.

• {{Db-multiple|g12|url=source URL|other criteria}}
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations (0) (same category as F9)

G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions

• WP:G13

This applies to any pages that have not been edited by a human in six months found in:

1. Draft namespace,
2. Userspace with an {{AFC submission}} template
3. Userspace with no content except the article wizard placeholder text.

Redirects are exempt from G13 deletion. Adding a CSD template to a page does not reset the six-month clock, but removing a CSD template does. Pages deleted under G13 may be restored upon request by following the procedure at Misplaced Pages:Requests for undeletion/G13.

• {{Db-g13}}, {{Db-afc}}, {{db-blankdraft}}
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as abandoned drafts or AfC submissions (0)

G14. Unnecessary disambiguation pages

• WP:G14

This applies to the following disambiguation pages and redirects:

• Disambiguation pages that have titles ending in "(disambiguation)" but disambiguate only one extant Misplaced Pages page.
• Regardless of title, disambiguation pages that disambiguate zero extant Misplaced Pages pages.
• Redirects that end in "(disambiguation)" but target neither disambiguation pages nor pages that perform disambiguation-like functions (such as set index articles or lists).

If a disambiguation page links to only one article and does not end in (disambiguation), it should be changed to a redirect, unless it is more appropriate to move the linked page to the title currently used for the disambiguation page.

• {{Db-g14}}, {{Db-disambig}}
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as unnecessary disambiguation pages (0)

Articles

• WP:ACSD

These criteria apply only to pages in the article (main) namespace. They do not apply to redirects. For any articles that are not speedy deletion candidates, use Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion or Misplaced Pages:Proposed deletion.

A1. No context

• WP:A1

This applies to articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Example: "He is a funny man with a red car. He makes people laugh." It applies only to very short articles. Note that context is different from content, treated in A3. This excludes coherent non-English material, and poorly translated material. If any information in the title or on the page, including links, allows an editor, possibly with the aid of a web search, to find further information on the subject in an attempt to expand or edit it, A1 is not appropriate. Do not tag under this criterion in the first few minutes after a new article is created.

• {{Db-a1}}, {{Db-nocontext}}
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as lacking context (0)

A2. Foreign-language articles that exist on another Wikimedia project

• WP:A2

This applies to articles not written in English that have essentially the same content as an article on another Wikimedia project. If the article is not the same as an article on another project, use the template {{Not English}} instead, and list the page at Misplaced Pages:Pages needing translation into English for review and possible translation.

• {{Db-a2}}, {{Db-foreign}}
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as existing on foreign Wikimedia projects (0)

A3. No content

• WP:A3

This applies to articles consisting only of external links, category tags or "See also" sections, a rephrasing of the title, attempts to correspond with the person or group named by its title, questions that should have been asked at a noticeboard, chat-like comments, template tags, or images. This may also apply to articles consisting entirely of the framework of the Article wizard with no additional content, or no content at all. However, a very short article may be a valid stub if it has context, in which case it is not eligible for deletion under this criterion. Similarly, this criterion does not cover a page having only an infobox, unless its contents also meet another speedy deletion criterion. This criterion excludes poor writing, coherent non-English material, and poorly translated material. Do not tag under this criterion in the first few minutes after a new article is created.

• {{Db-a3}}, {{Db-nocontent}}, {{Db-contact}}
• {{Db-empty}} – context-specific version: calls {{Db-c1}} for categories, and {{Db-a3}} everywhere else.
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as empty articles (0)

A7. No indication of importance (people, animals, organizations, web content, events)

• WP:A7

This applies to any article about a real person, individual animal, commercial or non-commercial organization, web content, or organized event that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, with the exception of educational institutions. This is distinct from verifiability and reliability of sources, and is a lower standard than notability. This criterion applies only to articles about the listed subjects; in particular, it does not apply to articles about albums (these may be covered by CSD A9), products, books, films, TV programs, software, or other creative works, nor to entire species of animals. The criterion does apply if the claim of significance or importance given is not credible, and any article with a blatantly false claim may be submitted for speedy deletion as a hoax instead. If the claim's credibility is unclear, you can improve the article yourself, propose deletion, or list the article at articles for deletion.

The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Misplaced Pages's notability guidelines.

• {{Db-a7}}
• {{Db-person}} – for people
• {{Db-band}} – for bands
• {{Db-club}} – for clubs, societies and groups
• {{Db-inc}} – for commercial and non-commercial organizations
• {{Db-web}} – for web content
• {{Db-animal}} – for individual animals
• {{Db-event}} – for events
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as importance or significance not asserted (0) (same as A9)

A9. No indication of importance (musical recordings)

• WP:A9

This applies to any article about a musical recording or list of musical recordings where none of the contributing recording artists has an article and that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant (both conditions must be met). This is distinct from questions of verifiability and reliability of sources, and is a lower standard than notability. This criterion does not apply to other forms of creative media, products, or any other types of articles.

The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Misplaced Pages's notability guidelines.

• {{Db-a9}}, {{Db-album}}, {{Db-song}}, {{Db-discog}}
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as importance or significance not asserted (0) (same as A7)

A10. Recently created article that duplicates an existing topic

• WP:A10

This applies to any recently created article with no relevant page history that duplicates an existing English Misplaced Pages article, and that does not expand upon, detail or improve information within any existing article(s) on the subject, and where the title is not a plausible redirect. This does not include split pages or any article that expands or reorganizes an existing one or that contains referenced, mergeable material. It also does not include disambiguation pages.

• {{Db-a10|article=Existing article title}}, {{Db-same|article=Existing article title}}

The title chosen for the vast majority of duplicate articles will be a plausible misspelling of, or alternative name for, the existing article, and a redirect should be created instead of deletion. This criterion should, accordingly, only be used rarely, and only for pages whose titles are not plausible redirects.

• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as duplicate articles (0)

A11. Obviously invented

• WP:A11

This applies to any article that plainly indicates that the subject was invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone the creator personally knows, and does not credibly indicate why its subject is important or significant. The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify under Misplaced Pages's notability guidelines. Note: This is not intended for hoaxes (see CSD G3).

• {{Db-a11}}, {{Db-invented}}, {{Db-madeup}}
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as obviously invented (0)

Redirects

• WP:RCSD

These criteria apply to redirects, including soft redirects, in any namespace, with exclusions listed for specific criteria. For any redirects that are not speedy deletion candidates, use Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion.

R2. Cross-namespace redirects

• WP:R2

This applies to redirects (apart from shortcuts) from the main namespace to any other namespace except the Category:, Template:, Misplaced Pages:, Help: and Portal: namespaces.

See also Misplaced Pages:Cross-namespace redirects, Category:Cross-namespace redirects, and MOS:LINKSTYLE.

• {{Db-r2}}, {{Db-rediruser}}
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as inappropriate cross-namespace redirects (0)

R3. Recently created, implausible typos

• WP:R3

This applies to recently created redirects from implausible typos or misnomers. However, redirects from common misspellings or misnomers are generally useful, as are some redirects in other languages. This criterion does not apply to redirects created as a result of a page move, unless nothing was at the title until recently. It also does not apply to articles and stubs that have been converted into redirects, including redirects created by merges, or to redirects ending with "(disambiguation)" that point to a disambiguation page.

• {{Db-r3}}, {{Db-redirtypo}}
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as implausible redirects (0)

R4. File namespace redirects with names that match Wikimedia Commons pages

• WP:R4

This applies to redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons, provided the redirect on Misplaced Pages has no file links (unless the links are obviously intended for the file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons).

• {{Db-r4}}, {{Db-redircom}}
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as file redirects shadowing Wikimedia Commons files (0)

Other issues with redirects

• For redirects to deleted or non-existent pages, see G8.
• For redirects that end in "(disambiguation)", see G14.
• For redirects without a space before a parenthetical disambiguation, see X3.
• For redirects that are not speedy deletion candidates, use Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion.

Redirect pages that have useful page history should never be speedily deleted. In some cases it may be possible to make a useful redirect by changing the target instead of deleting it. Redirects that do not work because of software limitations, such as redirects to special pages or to pages on other wikis, may be converted to soft redirects if they have a non-trivial history or other valid uses.

For reversal of redirects, use {{Db-move}}, a special case of {{Db-g6}}.

Files

• WP:FCSD
• WP:DI

Note: These criteria formerly began with I (e.g. I1, I6, I9) but have since been replaced with F, without the actual criteria being changed. This was because the file namespace was formerly known as the image namespace.

For any images and other media that are not speedy deletion candidates, use Misplaced Pages:Proposed deletion or Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion.

F1. Redundant

• WP:CSD#F1

This applies to unused duplicates or lower-quality/resolution copies of another Misplaced Pages file having the same file format. This excludes images in the Wikimedia Commons; for these, see criterion F8.

• {{Db-f1|replacement file name.ext}}, {{Db-redundantfile|replacement file name.ext}}, {{Isd|replacement file name.ext}}
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as redundant files (0)

F2. Corrupt, missing, or empty file

• WP:F2

This applies to files that are corrupt, missing, empty, or that contain superfluous and blatant non-metadata information. This also applies to file description pages that lack a corresponding file or correspond to Commons files and do not include information that is specific to English Misplaced Pages (like {{FeaturedPicture}}).

• {{Db-f2}}, {{Db-nofile}}, {{Db-fpcfail}}
• {{Db-imagepage}} – for file description pages with no corresponding file
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as missing files (0)

F3. Improper license

• WP:F3

This criterion is used to flag media licensed as "for non-commercial use only" (including non-commercial Creative Commons licenses), "no derivative use", "for Misplaced Pages use only" or "used with permission". These may be deleted, unless they comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. Files uploaded after 1 August 2021 licensed under versions of the GFDL earlier than 1.3, without allowing for later versions or other licenses, may be deleted.

• {{Db-f3}}, {{Db-noncom}}
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as files with unacceptable licenses (0)

F4. Lack of licensing information

• WP:F4

This applies to media files lacking the necessary licensing information to verify copyright status after being identified as such for seven days. Administrators should check the upload summary, file information page, and the image itself for a source before deleting under this criterion.

• {{subst:Di-no source}}, {{subst:Nsd}} – no source
• {{subst:Di-no license}}, {{subst:Nld}} – no license
• {{subst:Di-no source no license}}, {{subst:Nsdnld}} – neither source nor license
• {{subst:Di-dw no source}}, {{subst:Dw-nsd}} – derivative work with no source for the incorporated work
• {{subst:Di-dw no license}}, {{subst:Dw-nld}} – derivative work with no license for the incorporated work
• {{subst:Di-dw no source no license}}, {{subst:Dw-nsdnld}} – derivative work with neither source nor license for the incorporated work
• Category:Misplaced Pages files with unknown source, Category:Misplaced Pages files with unknown copyright status

F5. Orphaned non-free use files

• WP:F5

This applies to images and other media that are not under a free license or in the public domain and that are not used in any article. These may be deleted after being identified as such for more than seven days or immediately if the image's only use was on a deleted article and it is very unlikely to have any use on any other valid article. This includes previous revisions of the image or files overwritten by copyright violations. Reasonable exceptions may be made for images uploaded for an upcoming article.

• {{Db-f5}} – for immediate F5 deletions
• {{subst:Di-orphaned non-free use}}, {{subst:Orfud}} – for files
• {{subst:Orphaned non-free revisions}}, {{subst:Orfurrev}} – for revisions only
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as orphaned non-free use files (0)

F6. Missing non-free use rationale

• WP:F6

This applies to non-free files claiming fair use but without a use rationale. These may be deleted after being identified as such for seven days. The boilerplate copyright tags setting out fair use criteria does not constitute a rationale. This criterion does not apply to situations where a use rationale is provided but is disputed.

• {{Di-no non-free use rationale}}, {{subst:Nrd}} – no non-free use rationale
• {{Di-missing article links}} – missing non-free use rationale for one or more articles
• Category:All Misplaced Pages files with no non-free use rationale (3)

F7. Invalid fair-use claim

• WP:F7

2. Non-free images or media from a press agency or photo agency (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary, are considered an invalid claim of fair use and fail the strict requirements of Misplaced Pages:Non-free content criteria, and may be deleted immediately.
3. Non-free images or media that have been identified as being replaceable by a free image and tagged with {{Rnfu}} may be deleted after Two days, if no justification is given for the claim of irreplaceability. If the replaceability is disputed, the nominator should not be the one deleting the image.
4. Invalid fair-use claims tagged with {{Dnfu}} may be deleted seven days after they are tagged, if a full and valid fair-use use rationale is not added.

• {{Db-f7}}, {{Db-badfairuse}} – for immediate F7 deletions
• {{subst:Di-replaceable non-free use}}, {{subst:Rnfu}} – replaceable with free images
• {{subst:Di-disputed non-free use rationale}}, {{subst:Dnfu}} – disputed non-free use rationales
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as files with clearly invalid fair-use claims (0)

F8. Files available as identical copies on Wikimedia Commons

• WP:F8

Provided the following conditions are met:

• The Commons version is in the same file format and is of the same or higher quality/resolution.
• The file's license and source status is beyond reasonable doubt, and the license is undoubtedly accepted at Commons. To avoid deletion at Commons, please ensure the Commons page description has all of the following:
  • Name and date of death of the creator of the artistic work represented by the file, or else clear evidence that a free license was given. If anonymous, ensure the page description provides evidence that establishes the anonymous status.
  • Country where the artistic work represented by the file was situated, or where it was first published.
  • Date when the artistic work represented by the file was created or first published, depending on the copyright law of the origin country.
  • All file revisions that meet the first condition have been transferred to Commons as revisions of the Commons copy and properly marked as such.
• The file is not marked as {{Do not move to Commons}} or as {{Keep local}}.
• All information on the image description page is present on the Commons image description page, including the complete upload history with links to the uploader's local user pages (the upload history is not necessary if the file's license does not require it, although it is still recommended).
  • If there is any information not relevant to any other project on the file description page (like {{FeaturedPicture}}), the image description page must be undeleted after the file deletion.
• If the file is available on Commons under a different name than locally, all local references to the image must be updated to point to the title used at Commons.
• The file is not protected. Do not delete protected images, even if there is an identical copy on Commons, unless the image is no longer in use (check what links here). They are usually locally uploaded and protected here since they are used in the interface or in some widely used high-risk templates. Deleting the local copy of an image used in the interface does break things. More about high-risk images.
• {{C-uploaded}} images and other files may be speedily deleted as soon as they are off the Main Page.
• {{Db-f8}}, {{Now Commons}}, {{Now Commons|File:name of file on Commons.ext}}
• Category:Misplaced Pages files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons, Category:Misplaced Pages files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons

F9. Unambiguous copyright infringement

• WP:F9

This applies to obviously non-free images (or other media files) that are not claimed by the uploader to be fair use. A URL or other indication of where the image originated should be mentioned. This does not include images with a credible claim that the owner has released them under a Misplaced Pages-compatible free license. Most images from stock photo libraries such as Getty Images will not be released under such a license. Blatant infringements should be tagged with the {{Db-filecopyvio}} template. Non-blatant copyright infringements should be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion.

• {{Db-f9|url=URL of source}}, {{Db-filecopyvio|url=URL of source}}
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations (0)

F11. No evidence of permission

• WP:F11

If an uploader has specified a license and has named a third party as the source/copyright holder without providing evidence that this third party has in fact agreed, the item may be deleted seven days after notification of the uploader. Acceptable evidence of licensing normally consists of either a link to the source website where the license is stated, or a statement by the copyright holder e-mailed or forwarded to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Such a confirmation is also required if the source is an organization that the uploader claims to represent, or a web publication that the uploader claims to be their own. Instances of obvious copyright violations where the uploader would have no reasonable expectation of obtaining permission (e.g. major studio movie posters, television images, album covers, logos that are not simple enough to be public domain, etc.) should be speedily deleted per reason F9 (unambiguous copyright infringement), unless fair-use can be claimed. Files tagged with {{Permission pending}} for more than 30 days may also be speedily deleted under this criterion. (Please note that the backlog for messages sent to the permissions-en queue is currently 0 days. You may wish to wait at least this amount of time before tagging VRT pending images for deletion.) Files tagged {{Permission received}} whose permissions have not been confirmed after 30 days may be deleted immediately under this criterion, without waiting an additional seven days, provided a check of the ticket is performed by a VRT agent to confirm that no further interaction is ongoing.

• {{subst:Di-no permission}}, {{subst:Npd}}
• {{subst:Db-no permission-VRT}}
• Category:Misplaced Pages files missing permission

Categories

• WP:CCSD

For any category pages that are not speedy deletion candidates, use Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion.

C1. Unpopulated categories

• WP:C1

This criterion applies to categories that have been unpopulated for at least seven days. This does not apply to disambiguation categories, category redirects, categories under discussion at Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion (or other such discussions), or project categories that by their nature may become empty on occasion (e.g. cleanup categories, or Category:Wikipedians looking for help). Place {{Possibly empty category}} (or, for administrative categories, {{Misplaced Pages category}}) at the top of the page to prevent such categories from being deleted.

• {{Db-c1}}, {{db-catempty}}.
• {{Db-empty}} – context-specific version: calls {{Db-c1}} for categories, and {{Db-a3}} everywhere else.
• Category:Empty categories awaiting deletion (101), and after seven days Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as empty categories (0)

C2. Speedy renaming and merging

Assorted sub-criteria that are used only at WP:CFDS; please see that page for details and instructions.

C4. Unused maintenance categories

• WP:C4

This criterion applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past (e.g. Category:Articles lacking sources from July 2004), tracking categories no longer used by a template after a rewrite, or empty subcategories of Category:Misplaced Pages sockpuppets or Category:Suspected Misplaced Pages sockpuppets. Note that empty maintenance categories are not necessarily unused—this criterion is for categories that will always be empty, not just currently empty. If you are unsure whether a category is still being used by a template, consider asking the creator of the category or at the template's talk page before tagging.

• {{db-c4}}, {{db-templatecat}}
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as unused maintenance categories (0)

Templates

• WP:TCSD

For any templates and Lua modules that are not speedy deletion candidates, use Misplaced Pages:Templates for discussion.

T5. Unused template subpages

• WP:T5

This applies to unused subpages of templates, such as:

• Template documentation subpages unused by the template itself
• /core subpages which are not called by the template itself
• Old subpages of {{POTD protected}}
• Unnecessary subpages of {{Taxonomy}}, e.g. because it is incorrectly set up, or relates to a taxon no longer used

It excludes /testcases and /sandbox subpages, subpages of Module:Sandbox, as well as anything tagged with {{T5-exempt}}. Reasonable exceptions apply for subpages which will be used soon, and editors are free to request undeletion.

• {{Db-t5}}
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as unused template subpages (0)

User pages

• WP:UCSD

These criteria apply only to pages in the User: and User talk: namespaces. For any user pages that are not speedy deletion candidates, use Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion.

U1. User request

• WP:U1

Personal user pages and subpages (but not user talk pages) upon request by their user. This also includes editnotices for user pages. In some rare cases, there may be administrative need to retain the page. User talk pages are not eligible for speedy deletion under this criterion. Pages that have previously been moved are only eligible if all previous titles were in the user's userspace. Note: The template does not display on certain pages (such as .css and .js pages), but its categorization will work.

• {{Db-u1}}, {{Db-userreq}}
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion by user (1)

U2. Nonexistent user

• WP:U2

This applies to user pages, user subpages, and user talk pages of users that do not exist on the English Misplaced Pages (check Special:ListUsers), except user pages for IP users who have edited, redirects from misspellings of an established user's user page, and redirects created due to a user being renamed. Pages of users who exist on other WMF wikis but do not have local accounts are eligible for deletion.

Before placing one of the following templates or deleting a page under this criterion, consider whether moving the page to another location, such as a sub-page of the user page of the primary contributor, is preferable to deletion.

• {{Db-u2}}, {{Db-nouser}}
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as userpage or subpage of a nonexistent user (0)

U5. A non-contributor's misuse of Misplaced Pages as a web host

• WP:U5

Pages in userspace consisting of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Misplaced Pages's goals, where the owner has made few or no edits outside of user pages, except for plausible drafts and pages adhering to Misplaced Pages:User pages § What may I have in my user pages? It applies regardless of the age of the page in question.

Before placing this template or deleting a page under this criterion:

• Read Misplaced Pages:User pages § Handling inappropriate content and Misplaced Pages:User pages § Deletion of user pages.
• Consider blanking pages with a significant history unrelated to the content that is being deleted.
• For draft articles that are on a user's main page and which do not otherwise qualify for speedy deletion, consider moving it to a sub-page.
• {{Db-u5}}, {{Db-notwebhost}}
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as blatant NOTWEBHOST violations (6)

Exceptional circumstances

• WP:XCSD

These temporary criteria apply to large-scale cleanups of problematic pages that would overwhelm the normal deletion processes. Criteria should be deprecated when no longer needed.

X3. Redirects with no space before a parenthetical disambiguation

• WP:X3

Examples: "Foo(bar)", "Joe Smith(disambiguation)". This does not apply to terms that will correctly or plausibly be searched for without spaces, nor does it apply if the redirect contains substantive page history (e.g. from a merge). Before nominating a redirect under this criterion:

• Create the correctly spaced version as a redirect to the same target if it would make a good redirect but does not exist
• Adjust any incoming internal links to point to the correctly spaced version
• {{db-x3}}
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as redirects with no space before a parenthetical disambiguation (0)

Non-criteria

• WP:NOTCSD

Commonly denied CSD reasons

The following proposals for new speedy deletion criteria are frequently raised, but have repeatedly failed to gain consensus:

• How-to articles
• Essay articles
• Expansion of A7, A9 and A11 to include books, software, schools and/or other subjects
• Neologisms
• Unsourced articles

A7, A9 and A11 scope

A7, A9 and A11 do not apply to any other subject that does not indicate importance. Expanding the scope of A7, A9 and A11 to different subjects (such as products, software, books, schools, etc.) have been proposed several times in the past and failed to gain consensus. Amongst the reasons for those rejections were that such subjects are not created often enough to require speedy deletion (such articles can be handled by proposed deletion or by listing the article at articles for deletion), that such subjects cannot be objectively covered in A7, A9 and A11's wording and that admins are not able to assess claims of importance for certain subjects. Before proposing a change to A7, A9 and A11 to expand their scope, please check whether your proposal has not already been discussed on the talk page (archives).

The following are not by themselves sufficient to justify speedy deletion:

1. Reasons based on Misplaced Pages:What Misplaced Pages is not or essays. Misplaced Pages is not: "a dictionary", "an indiscriminate collection of information", "a crystal ball", "a how-to list"; or essays like Misplaced Pages:Listcruft, Misplaced Pages:Obscure topics, Misplaced Pages:Deny recognition,...; are not valid reasons for speedy deletion.
2. Less-obvious hoaxes. If even remotely plausible, a suspected hoax article should be subjected to further scrutiny in a wider forum. Truth is often stranger than fiction. Note that "blatant and obvious hoaxes and misinformation" are subject to speedy deletion as vandalism.
3. Original research. It is not always easy to tell whether an article consists of material that violates the policy against novel theories or interpretations or is simply unsourced.
4. Notability. Articles that seem to have obviously non-notable subjects are eligible for speedy deletion only if the article does not give a credible indication of why the subject might be important or significant.
5. Failure to assert importance but not an A7, A9 or A11 category. There is no consensus to speedily delete articles of types not specifically listed in A7, A9 or A11 under those criteria. Nor does it apply for neologisms that do not meet A11 because new specialized terms should have a wider hearing.
6. Author deletion requests made in bad faith. Author deletion requests made in bad faith, out of frustration, after others have contributed substantially (because the work of others is involved) or in an attempt to revoke their freely-licensed contributions are not granted. However, anyone may request deletion of pages in their userspace.
7. Very short articles. Short articles with sufficient content and context to qualify as stubs may not be speedily deleted under criteria A1 and A3; other criteria may still apply.
8. Copies that are not copyright violations. If content appears both here and somewhere else (possibly in modified form), consider the possibility that Misplaced Pages's is the original version and the other site copied from Misplaced Pages's version. Alternatively, the same author may have written both versions, or the original may be free content.
9. PNG / GIF files replaced by JPEG images. JPEG encoding discards information that may be important later. Do not delete the original PNG / GIF files.
10. Questionable material that is not vandalism. Earnest efforts are never vandalism, so to assume good faith, do not delete as vandalism unless reasonably certain.
11. User and user talk pages of IP addresses. Although users are encouraged to create Misplaced Pages accounts, unregistered users are still allowed to edit Misplaced Pages, and are identified by their IP addresses. If an unregistered user has a static IP address, it may have a user page and/or user talk page associated with it, and even for non-static IP addresses, the history can contain important discussions or information that may be of interest.
12. An article written in a foreign language or script. An article should not be speedily deleted just because it is not written in English. Instead it should be tagged with {{Not English}} and listed at Misplaced Pages:Pages needing translation into English. It may be reconsidered after translation whether the article merits deletion, retention or improvement by means of a suitable tag. However, if it already exists on another Wikimedia project, it might be speedily deletable under criterion A2.
13. Subject request. Sometimes somebody claiming to be the subject of a biographical article requests deletion of the article, or even blanks the article. Article subjects do not have an automatic right to have their articles deleted. Nor does such a criterion apply to namespaces other than article space: for example, pages in the Misplaced Pages namespace devoted to a discussion about a particular editor. See also: Misplaced Pages:Deletion policy § Deletion of biographies and BLPs
14. Orphaned pages or redirects. A page cannot be deleted just because no other pages link to it. This includes redirects – even if 'What links here' returns nothing, a redirect may be a likely search phrase, or have links to it from outside Misplaced Pages.
15. Redirects that are poorly targeted. A redirect should not be deleted just because its target is incorrect or confusing. Instead, change the redirect to a better target. If you're not sure where it should be targeted, open a discussion at Redirects for discussion.
16. Drafts covering the same topic as an existing mainspace article. These are not valid deletions under A10 (due to not being articles) nor G6. They can be replaced with a redirect to the mainspace article if necessary.
17. Conflict of interest. Merely having an author connected to its subject, or even one paid to write about it, is not by itself sufficient to speedy delete a page. While users with promotional usernames are frequently blocked, G5 does not apply unless they were already evading a block or ban when they wrote it. G11 can be used to delete exclusively-promotional writing, but doesn't apply to neutrally-written material even if the intent is obviously promotional. U5 can also be used in some cases, but excludes anything plausibly intended as a draft article.

Procedure for administrators

Make sure to specify the reason for deletion in the deletion summary. Also, in general, the article's creator and major contributors should have been notified.

Before deleting a page, check the page history to assess whether it would instead be possible to revert and salvage a previous version, or there was actually a cut-and-paste move involved. Also:

• The initial edit summary may have information about the source of or reason for the page.
• The talk page may refer to previous deletion discussions or have ongoing discussion relevant to including the page.
• The page log may have information about previous deletions that could warrant SALTing the page or keeping it on good reason.
• What links here may show that the page is an oft-referred part of the encyclopedia, or may show other similar pages that warrant deletion. For pages that should not be re-created, incoming links in other pages (except in discussions, archives and tracking pages) should be removed.

If speedy deletion is inappropriate for a page:

1. Please remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. Doing so will automatically remove the page from Category:Candidates for speedy deletion.
2. Consider notifying the nominator, using {{speedy-decline}} or {{uw-csd}}. (If you're using CSD Helper, it will usually notify the nominator for you; it will normally use its own notification template.)

When deleting a page through the speedy deletion process, please specify the reason for deletion in the deletion summary, so that it will be recorded into the deletion log. Quoting page content in the deletion summary may be helpful, but must not be done for attack content or copyrighted text. In some cases, it would be appropriate to notify the page's creator of the deletion.

Twinkle or CSDHelper can be used to process nominations more quickly and smoothly. When processing a nomination:

• Twinkle can delete the page.
  • Twinkle can notify the page creator if the page is deleted.
• CSDH can delete the page, convert the nomination into a PROD nomination, or decline the nomination.
  • CSDH can notify the nominator if the nomination is converted or declined.

Obsolete

• WP:OCSD
• WP:PCSD

In the past, criteria beginning with the following letter were used:

• "P" for portals

All criteria in this group have been obsoleted; as such, this group is not currently in use. Some criteria in the active groups were also used in the past but are no longer valid. They are kept here for historical reference and to preserve numbering. Two of the repealed criteria did not have consensus before being enacted, and two were meant to be temporary. The remainder were merged into broader criteria or deprecated entirely.

A4. Attempts to correspond with the person or group named by its title

Merged with and later superseded by "No content" (A3) in November 2005 as part of a bold rewrite that was made to simplify the CSD criterion (archived discussion 1, discussion 2, discussion 3).

A5. Transwikied articles

Was repealed in December 2022 due to lack of use (unopposed proposal). Instead, use Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion. Deleted articles that are temporarily restored to allow for a transwiki may be re-deleted under "technical deletion" (G6).

A6. Attack articles

Superseded by "Attack pages" (G10) in March 2006 (discussion).

A8. Blatant copyright infringement articles

Superseded by "Unambiguous copyright infringement" (G12) in October 2006 (unopposed proposal).

R1. Redirects to non-existent pages

Merged into "Pages dependent on a non-existent or deleted page" (G8) in September 2008 (discussion).

F7a. Non-free images or media with a clearly invalid fair-use tag

Repealed in March 2021 due to the problem being easily surmountable (discussion). Instead, the invalid tag should be corrected. Once the tag is corrected, other speedy deletion criteria may apply.

F10. Useless non-media files

Deprecated in favor of proposed deletion in February 2023 following rare usage and added technical restrictions on what file types can be uploaded (discussion).

C3. Categories solely populated from a template

Merged into "Pages dependent on a non-existent or deleted page" (G8) in October 2008 (discussion), and then later split out to C4. Unused maintenance categories in 2024.

T1. Divisive and inflammatory templates

Enacted by Jimbo Wales without formally assessing consensus during the userbox wars. Was repealed in February 2009 (discussion). Instead, "attack pages" (G10) may be applicable in some cases; otherwise, use Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion for userboxes and Misplaced Pages:Templates for discussion for all other templates.

T2. Misrepresentation of policy

Was repealed in July 2020 following rare, often incorrect, use (discussion). Instead, "pure vandalism" (G3) may be applicable in some cases; otherwise, use Misplaced Pages:Templates for discussion.

T3. Duplication and hardcoded instances

Was repealed in December 2020 due to misuse and the seven day hold (discussion). Instead, use an existing applicable criterion or submit the template to Misplaced Pages:Templates for discussion.

T4. Subpages of non-existent pages

Merged into "Pages dependent on a non-existent or deleted page" (G8) in September 2008 (discussion).

U3. Non-free galleries

Was repealed in July 2021 since a bot automatically removes non-free images from user pages (discussion).

U4. Old IP address talk pages that meet specific criteria

Never enacted as policy anywhere, but deletions occurred nonetheless. Was repealed in March 2009 (discussion).

P1. Any portal that would be subject to speedy deletion as an article

Repealed in February 2023 following rare usage (discussion).

P2. Underpopulated portal

Repealed in February 2023 following rare usage (discussion).

X1. Redirects created by Neelix

Created as a G6 extension in December 2015 shortly after the discovery and arbitration case regarding 50,000+ questionable redirects created by the user Neelix, and later split into its own criterion. Was repealed in April 2018 after cleanup was completed (discussion). Instead, use Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion.

X2. Pages created by the content translation tool

Created to delete pages created by the content translation tool prior to 27 July 2016. Was deprecated in July 2017 when consensus agreed to move most of the remaining pages to the draft namespace (discussion).

See also

• Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes
• Misplaced Pages:Alternative outlets
• Category:Candidates for speedy deletion
• Category:Speedy deletion warning templates
• Misplaced Pages:Criteria for speedy deletion/Deletion templates
• Misplaced Pages:Deletion guidelines for administrators
• Misplaced Pages:Deletion review
• Misplaced Pages:No blank pages
• Misplaced Pages:Proposed deletion
• Misplaced Pages:Undeletion policy
• Misplaced Pages:What to do if your article gets CSD tagged
• Misplaced Pages:Over-hasty Speedy Deleters
• Misplaced Pages:Field guide to proper speedy deletion

Footnotes

1. In this context, speedy refers to the simple decision-making process, not the length of time since the article was created.
2. The current wording of this paragraph dates to an April 2020 discussion. G14 was added in October 2020. C1 was added in August 2022. C4 was added in September 2024.
3. The result of the most recent deletion discussion controls. This means that if the most recent discussion was "keep" or a default to keep through no consensus, G4 does not apply. Likewise, an article that was deleted through its most recent discussion, but was kept in earlier discussions, is subject to the criterion and may be deleted (discussion).
4. For the avoidance of doubt, if a page is deleted at AfD and subsequently recreated as a redirect, G4 does not apply, even if that option was discussed and rejected in the AfD (discussion).
5. A conversion to draft is when a page from a different namespace is moved, or its content copied, as a draft.
6. The arbitration committee and the community have included the following when deciding a topic area should be covered by the extended confirmed restriction: "Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required."
7. ^ Page moves are excluded because of a history of improper deletions of these redirects. A move creates a redirect to ensure that any external links that point to Misplaced Pages remain valid; should such links exist, deleting these redirects will break them. Such redirects must be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion before deletion. However, redirects that were obviously made in error can be deleted as G6, technical deletions.
8. Note that new editors sometimes mistakenly start article drafts on talk pages that have no article. If you see this, move the draft to the draft space or to the user's userspace, making sure the new user is listed as author and not you.
9. It was determined that the community consensus in this RfC regarding draft namespace redirects amounted to "there is a clear consensus against deletion of draft namespace redirects. There is a rough consensus against the alternative proposal to delete draft namespace redirects after six months."
10. Per this RFC.
11. An Rfc containing relevant discussions on the A1 criterion
12. ^ Consensus has developed that in most cases articles should not be tagged for deletion under this criterion moments after creation as the creator may be actively working on the content; though there is no set time requirement, a ten-minute delay before tagging under this criterion is suggested as good practice. Please do not mark the page as patrolled before that delay passes, to ensure the article is reviewed at a later time.
13. Routine coverage of unorganised events – for example, shooting incidents – may not necessarily qualify under A7; deletion discussions should be preferred in such cases.
14. Past discussions leading to schools being exempt from A7.
15. ^ The definition of recent is intentionally flexible since some pages may receive more notice than others. Pages older than about 3–6 weeks are unlikely to be considered recently created; pages older than about 3–4 months almost never are. Higher-profile pages are considered recently created for shorter periods than those with a lower profile.
16. Unlike a hoax, subject to deletion as vandalism under CSD G3 as a bad faith attempt to deceive, CSD A11 is for topics that were or may have been actually created and are real, but have no notice or significance except among a small group of people, e.g. a newly invented drinking game or new word.
17. See Misplaced Pages:Merge and delete for an explanation as to why redirects created by merges cannot be deleted in most cases.
18. This does not apply to images duplicated on Wikimedia Commons, because of license issues; instead see "Images available as identical copies on the Wikimedia Commons".
19. Before deleting this latter type of file/page, check whether the MediaWiki engine can read it by previewing a resized thumbnail of it. Even if it renders, if it contains significant superfluous information that cannot be accounted for as metadata directly relating to the media data, it may be deleted. It is always preferred to correct the problem by uploading a file that contains only good data plus acceptable metadata.
20. Content from file description pages that is relevant to the Commons should be copied over before deleting the local page. If necessary, copy the attribution history as well.
21. See also: Category:All Misplaced Pages files with unknown source (57) and Category:All Misplaced Pages files with unknown copyright status (69)
22. See also: Category:All Misplaced Pages files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons (0) and Category:All Misplaced Pages files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons (2)
23. See also: Category:All Misplaced Pages files missing evidence of permission (51)
24. Misplaced Pages talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 85 § U2 and global accounts
25. Diff of change

• A nomination to merge or rename, brought forward as a full CfD, may be speedily closed if the closing administrator is satisfied that:
  • The nomination clearly falls within the scope of one of the criteria listed here,
  • And no objections have been made within 48 hours of the initial nomination.

• If both these conditions are satisfied, the closure will be regarded as having been as a result of a speedy nomination. If any objections have been raised then the CfD nomination will remain in place for the usual 7-day discussion period, to be decided in accordance with expressed consensus.

Add requests for speedy renaming here

If the category and desired change do not match one of the criteria mentioned in C2, do not list it here. Instead, list it in the main CFD section.

If you are in any doubt as to whether it qualifies, do not list it here.

Use the following format on a new line at the beginning of the list:

* ] to ] – {reason for rename here} ~~~~

This will sign and datestamp an entry automatically.

Remember to tag the category with: {{subst:Cfr-speedy|New name}}

A request may be completed if it is more than 48 hours old; that is, if the time stamp shown is earlier than 06:10, 23 December 2024 (UTC). Currently, there are 775 open requests (refresh).

Do not use the "Move" tab to move categories listed here! Categories are processed following the 48-hour discussion period and are moved by a bot.

Current nominations

• Category:International soccer competitions hosted by the United States to Category:International association football competitions hosted by the United States – C2.C: per CFD 2014-11-23, where it was decided the international element trumps the national one for subcategories of Category:International association football competitions by host. -- Black Falcon 16:01, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Category:International women's soccer competitions hosted by the United States to Category:International women's association football competitions hosted by the United States
• Category:Austrian Hairdressers to Category:Austrian hairdressers – C2A: caps Tim! (talk) 09:44, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
• Category:Skåne to Category:Scania – C2D Smartskaft (talk) 20:43, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

  Category was tagged as of 03:23, 22 March 2015 (UTC). The target is a category redirect. -- Black Falcon 03:23, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

• Category:Shipyard Associates of The Wire to Category:Shipyard associates of The Wire – C2B: I'm skeptical of breaking up the characters categories into shipyard associates in the first place but we should at least have proper caps per WP:CAPS. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:05, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
• Category:Municipal District of Big Lakes to Category:Big Lakes County – C2D to reflect parent article Big Lakes County, which was renamed from Municipal District of Big Lakes due to this official name change that occurred a couple of weeks ago Hwy43 (talk) 23:31, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
• Category:Religious leaders in the United States to Category:American religious leaders – Merge and redirect, C2C as part of Category:Religious leaders by nationality. Note that (a) Category:Religious leaders does not have a sub-cat by country, only by nationality; and (b) the contents of Category:Religious leaders in the United States are mostly by nationality ("leaders from") rather than country ("leaders in"). Only Category:Bishops has sub-cats by country as well as by nationality, and that does not justify creating a parent at this level. – Fayenatic London 22:50, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
• Category:Scientology and the legal system to Category:Scientology and law - C2C to parent Category:Religion and law. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:58, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

  @Marcocapelle: The main article is titled Scientology and the legal system, and so C2D would suggest retaining the current title; should the article be renamed as well? -- Black Falcon 15:23, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

• Makes perfect sense. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:41, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Opposed nominations

• Category:2013–15 Ukrainian crisis to Category:Ukrainian crisis – C2D: Main article was moved to Ukrainian crisis. RGloucester — ☎ 05:09, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

  Comment didn't we discuss just this category name last month? -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 05:29, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

  It was nominated previously and opposed. This needs a full CfD. -- Black Falcon 15:58, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

It was not "opposed". Only one person of questionable intelligence voiced some "concerns" about it. The move must be speedied immediately, per C2D. Please stop disrupting what is necessary for the continuance of the encylopaedia. Carry out the move at once, or action will need to be taken. RGloucester — ☎ 16:01, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

• Why the hurry? If you just nominate this on CfD it'll be okay in a couple of weeks. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:39, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

• Oppose speedy process, as C2D says "If the page names are controversial… in any way, then this criterion does not apply." – Fayenatic London 17:10, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

I absolutely refuse to open CfD. This must go through as a speedy. We cannot allow people of disruptive characters to rule this encylopaedia. The page name is not controversial. It was decided through an RM, recently. Hence, that does not apply. I absolutely refuse to wait any longer. This must go through at once, or I will be forced to request administrative action against any who obfuscate it. C2D. Move the page, now. RGloucester — ☎ 18:18, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

• Category:Sharjah (emirate) to Category:Emirate of Sharjah – see main article. Gryffindor (talk) 13:09, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

  @Gryffindor: The category is not tagged, but my main question is what should happen to the subcategories. Do they pertain to Sharjah, the emirate, or to the city? -- Black Falcon 15:43, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Procedural rejection as the category page has not been tagged. – Fayenatic London 17:19, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

• Category:German Jews who immigrated to the United States to escape Nazism to Category:German Jews who emmigrated to the United States to escape Nazism Grammar. You emigrate to, immigrate from. Hawkeye7 (talk) 07:17, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

  I believe it's the other way around, which is why these categories were renamed. You immigrate to somewhere, emigrate from. You are an emigrant from the place you leave, but an immigrant to the place you arrive in. (This is a different format than all of the "FOOian emigrants to BAR" categories on Misplaced Pages because the noun here is "Jews", not "emigrants". The "immigrated" part here is a verb, with the object of "to the United States ...") Good Ol’factory 09:27, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

  No, you immigrate from, emigrate to. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:47, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

  I'm not following you at all, since the links you included say the opposite of what you are saying:

  First link: "The prefix e- (or ex-) usually means 'out of' or 'from.' The prefix im- (or in-) often means 'in' or 'into.' Therefore, emigrate means 'to move out of' and immigrate means 'to move into.'

  Second link: "To emigrate is to leave your country to reside elsewhere. To immigrate is to enter and reside in a new country." Good Ol’factory 21:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

  Can it be a difference between English variants? Off-topic, in my native language it is similar as to what Hawkeye suggests: 'to move out to' and 'to move in from'. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:54, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

  I don't think that the definition of the words vary by form of English. I think Hawkeye7 is just plain wrong when he states that you "immigrate from" but "emigrate to", since that's not how the words are strictly defined. But I think the comment by Place Clichy below is true as well—which one is chosen to be used in a particular sentence context can vary depending on where the emphasis or focus lies. Good Ol’factory 21:03, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

  I would tend to go for emigrate to the United States (one m). Both are grammatically correct (see for emigrate to Australia, cites "He emigrated to Belgium" in the Collins Thesaurus of the English Language). It seems to be a matter of emphasis on the selected point of view (see ) and the emphasis here is on the pressure to leave the original country (words German, Jews and Nazism) rather than the US as a choice of country. See also this usage note in the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language: "After the Nazis came to power in Germany, many scientists emigrated" but "The promise of prosperity here in the United States encouraged many people to immigrate". Clearly we're in the first case here. Place Clichy (talk) 08:58, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

  I'm open to renaming based on the rationale of the above comment (not based on the original rationale). I suppose it might be a good idea to have a full discussion about this, since in context there is no "correct" way. Good Ol’factory 21:10, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

  Per Clichy, you always say emigrate to and immigrate from. "Emigrate" is to leave; "immigrate" is to arrive. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:15, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

  I don't think that's true at all that one (ie, sources) always use it in the way you suggest in your first sentence. Your second sentence is correct, though, but can be read as contradicting your first sentence in the following ways. It is perfectly acceptable and common to state that "He immigrated to the United States", meaning he moved to the United States. It would be equally acceptable to say, "He emigrated from France", meaning he left France. Good Ol’factory 07:32, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

• Category:Woodstock Festival to Category:Woodstock – C2D: Woodstock (Note: also creator of cat.) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:11, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

  Subsequent to this nomination, I nominated the category for deletion. I have no opposition to the proposed speedy. --Richhoncho (talk) 22:16, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

  Oppose. Woodstock is ambiguous (see Woodstock (disambiguation)); OK for an article but not for a category. 92.24.144.10 (talk) 00:15, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

  Question Is the eventual intent to merge this with Category:Woodstock, New York? RevelationDirect (talk) 12:38, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

  Oppose as ambiguous. DexDor (talk) 17:45, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

  Strong Oppose -- The article should be renamed to match this: The origoinal Woodstock is a town in Oxfordshire, England. For further comments see main CFD page. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:31, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

• Category:Soul-jazz drummers to Category:Soul jazz drummers – C2D: Soul jazz, not soul-jazz —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:32, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Category:Soul-jazz flautists to Category:Soul jazz flautists
  • Category:Soul-jazz guitarists to Category:Soul jazz guitarists
  • Category:Soul-jazz keyboardists to Category:Soul jazz keyboardists
  • Category:Soul-jazz musicians to Category:Soul jazz musicians
  • Category:Soul-jazz organists to Category:Soul jazz organists
  • Category:Soul-jazz musicians by instrument to Category:Soul jazz musicians by instrument
  • Category:Soul-jazz pianists to Category:Soul jazz pianists
  • Category:Soul-jazz saxophonists to Category:Soul jazz saxophonists
  • Category:Soul-jazz trombonists to Category:soul jazz trombonists
  • Category:Soul-jazz trumpeters to Category:Soul jazz trumpeters
  • Category:Soul-jazz vocalists to Category:Soul jazz vocalists

    Oppose these soul-jazz ones. Things that are not hyphenated as nouns often are hyphenated when the two-word noun is used as a compound adjective. "Soul jazz" is a genre of music, thus a noun. But in "Soul-jazz musicians", "soul-jazz" is a compound adjective. It's the same reason that the noun is "African American" but the adjectival usage is "African-American people". Good Ol’factory 07:51, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

    Support to match main article, and for the same reason we don't use "punk-rock vocalists", "progressive-rock organists" etc. I'm not convinced that "soul" is used as a noun in this context; I figured it was an adjective. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 14:36, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

    "Soul jazz" would be the noun in Soul jazz, not "soul" alone. If it's a legitimate genre, the entire phrase is a unified noun. If it's just a phrase someone concocted and not a genre, then "soul" would just be an adjective. But in all of these examples of the nominated categories, "soul-jazz" is not a noun at all, but a compound adjective. You make a good point about other usages, though—punk rock and progressive rock, etc.—for that reason, in a full discussion I would not oppose if there was evidence that the term in usually used as an adjective unhyphenated. Ultimately, it's safe to follow common usage rather than technical "rules" of grammar. Good Ol’factory 00:51, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

    Oppose per GO. Grutness...wha? 03:33, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

On hold pending other discussion

• Polytechnic University of Timișoara
  • Category:Polytechnic University of Timișoara alumni to Category: Politehnica University of Timișoara alumni – per Politehnica University of Timișoara 2601:6:8400:478:4157:9CB9:CB79:EC76 (talk) 22:23, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Category:Polytechnic University of Timișoara faculty to Category: Politehnica University of Timișoara faculty – per Politehnica University of Timișoara 2601:6:8400:478:4157:9CB9:CB79:EC76 (talk) 22:23, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

    Object to speedy the article move seems technically deficient, there is an old requested move that failed for renaming the article, but it was renamed anyways. The article should have its name determined properly. -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 02:02, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

    Move request opened to address the procedural deficiency. See Talk:Polytechnic University of Timișoara -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 04:02, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

• On hold pending Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_March_8#Category:Greek_Orthodox_churches. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:40, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Category:Greek Orthodox churches in the United States to Category:Greek Orthodox church buildings in the United States - C2C to grandparent Category:Church buildings by denomination. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:58, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Category:Greek Orthodox churches in Lebanon to Category:Greek Orthodox church buildings in Lebanon - C2C to grandparent Category:Church buildings by denomination. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:58, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Category:Greek Orthodox churches in Turkey to Category:Greek Orthodox church buildings in Turkey - C2C to grandparent Category:Church buildings by denomination. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:58, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Category:Greek Orthodox churches in the United Kingdom to Category:Greek Orthodox church buildings in the United Kingdom - C2C to grandparent Category:Church buildings by denomination. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:58, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Category:Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Canada churches‎ to Category:Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Canada church buildings‎ - C2C to grandparent Category:Church buildings by denomination. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:58, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Category:Serbian Orthodox churches to Category:Serbian Orthodox church buildings - C2C to grandparent Category:Church buildings by denomination. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:41, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Category:Churches in Moldova to Category:Church buildings in Moldova - C2C to parent Category:Church buildings by country. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:16, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Category:Orthodox churches to Category:Orthodox church buildings - C2C to parent Category:Church buildings by denomination. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:39, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Category:Armenian Apostolic churches to Category:Armenian Apostolic church buildings - C2C to grandparent Category:Church buildings by denomination. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:39, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Category:Coptic Orthodox churches to Category:Coptic Orthodox church buildings - C2C to grandparent Category:Church buildings by denomination. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:39, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Category:Orthodox churches in Egypt to Category:Orthodox church buildings in Egypt - C2C to grandparent Category:Church buildings by country. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:39, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Category:Orthodox churches in Poland to Category:Orthodox church buildings in Poland - C2C to grandparent Category:Church buildings by country. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:39, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Merge Category:Russian Orthodox churches to Category:Russian Orthodox church buildings - C2C to grandparent Category:Church buildings by country. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:39, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

    Oppose — this page isn't for merging; you should request a CFD for the merger. Nyttend (talk) 20:34, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

    @Nyttend: C2 has always been headed "Renaming and merging". Last year I clarified somewhat the criteria stated above, see archived discussion here. However, I see you have stated another objection to these renames/mergers below. – Fayenatic London 21:51, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Category:Syriac Orthodox churches to Category:Syriac Orthodox church buildings - C2C to grandparent Category:Church buildings by denomination. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:39, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

    Opposing a bunch of these. They're mixed in among others, and my reason for opposing is identical, so I'm just indenting the ones that I've opposed. "FAITH churches" is common for all flavors of Christianity. Special:Allpages shows that we have exactly forty categories beginning with "Church buildings"; that number's surpassed by Category:Roman Catholic churches in the United States by state and its fifty subcategories, completely ignoring other countries, other faiths, etc. Speedy renaming is for when one or a few categories are out of line with normal naming: in this case, the "Church buildings" categories are very much out of line with normal naming, and they need to be renamed to "Churches" except when an individual situation needs to be made different. Nyttend (talk) 20:34, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

    For the record, the Allpages link is . That only shows categories beginning with "Church buildings"; there may be more where those words are in the middle or end of the category name. Since "search:intitle" was broken for categories, I do not know how to search for or count them. – Fayenatic London 22:00, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Moved to full discussion

• Category:History of Serbia during Habsburg administration to Category:Habsburg period in the history of Serbia – C2C Zoupan 02:55, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

• Oppose I would suggest to reverse the merge, which would be C2C to Category:History of modern Serbia and just generally a more usual form of a category name. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:45, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

• @Zoupan: Moved to full discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:59, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

• Category:Greek Orthodox churches to Category:Greek Orthodox church buildings - C2C to grandparent Category:Church buildings by denomination. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:58, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

  "FAITH churches" is common for all flavors of Christianity. Special:Allpages shows that we have exactly forty categories beginning with "Church buildings"; that number's surpassed by Category:Roman Catholic churches in the United States by state and its fifty subcategories, completely ignoring other countries, other faiths, etc. Speedy renaming is for when one or a few categories are out of line with normal naming: in this case, the "Church buildings" categories are very much out of line with normal naming, and they need to be renamed to "Churches" except when an individual situation needs to be made different. Nyttend (talk) 20:34, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

  For the record, the Allpages link is . That only shows categories beginning with "Church buildings"; there may be more where those words are in the middle or end of the category name. Since "search:intitle" was broken for categories, I do not know how to search for or count them. – Fayenatic London 22:00, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

  @Nyttend: Full discussion at: Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_March_8#Category:Greek_Orthodox_churches.E2.80.8E. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:38, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

• Category:470 Sailing‎ to Category:470 sailing – No title case Smartskaft (talk) 13:05, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Category:49er Sailing‎‎ to Category:49er sailing
  • Category:Dragon Sailing‎‎ to Category:Dragon sailing
  • Category:Elliott 6m Sailing‎‎ to Category:Elliott 6m sailing
  • Category:Finn Sailing‎‎ to Category:Finn sailing
  • Category:Flying Dutchman Sailing‎‎ to Category:Flying Dutchman sailing
  • Category:Laser Radial Sailing‎ to Category:Laser Radial sailing
  • Category:Laser Sailing‎‎ to Category:Laser sailing
  • Category:RS:X Sailing‎‎ to Category:RS:X sailing
  • Category:Soling Sailing‎ to Category:Soling sailing
  • Category:Star Sailing‎ to Category:Star sailing
  • Category:Tempest Sailing‎ to Category:Tempest sailing
  • Category:Tornado Sailing‎‎ to Category:Tornado sailing
  • Category:Yngling Sailing‎ to Category:Yngling sailing

    Comment this title case change will make many things ambiguous. They are already ambiguous. They all need "-class" added to the classification name. For instance "tempest" is a storm, and you can sail in storms, given certain sailing techniques, but the category is not about storm sailing techniques, it is about a class of sailboat sailing. And "Laser Sailing" is NOT about laser sailing. There is nothing in that category that covers sailing using laser sails or star sailing on starlight. Nor is tornado sailing about sailing on tornado updrafts. And the Flying Dutchman sailing is not about the Flying Ducthman's legendary/mythical journeys on the sea. -- 65.94.40.137 (talk) 03:52, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

    We should merge to existing categories where they exist, such as Category:470 (dinghy) and Category:Finn (dinghy), and the highly ambiguous Category:Star which needs renaming. 49er (dinghy) did not have a category before, but I suggest that using "(dinghy)" is the best pattern to merge/rename, and would be eligible for C2C C2D. If we use "class", the sub-cats for sailors do not hyphenate it. – Fayenatic London 15:24, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

    Category:470 class, Category:470 class sailing, Category:470 sailing don't matter. Merging is probably the best, didn't think about that. // Smartskaft (talk) 20:27, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

    I see they are not all dinghies. Let's follow the names of the main articles. I think these articles can all be seen in Category:Olympic sailboat classes. – Fayenatic London 12:23, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

    That works for me ( "Category: XYZ sailing" where "XYZ" is the name of the root article, including disambiguatory terms... so "Category:470 (dinghy) sailing" etc ; the ambiguous Star, Laser, Flying Dutchman, Tempest, Tornado, etc would all add disambiguatory terms) -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 06:29, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

    Why would Category:470 (dinghy) need a sub-category called Category:470 (dinghy) sailing ? Let's just merge/rename to Category:470 (dinghy) etc. – Fayenatic London 20:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

    That seemed to be your suggestion ; merger is also possible. -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 05:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

    Now at full discussion including merger of parent. – Fayenatic London 08:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Ready for deletion

Check Category:Empty categories awaiting deletion for out of process deletions. In some cases, these will need to be nominated for discussion and the editor who emptied the category informed that they should follow the WP:CFD process.

Once the renaming has been completed, copy and paste the listing to the Ready for deletion section of Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Working/Manual.

• Misplaced Pages policies
• Misplaced Pages deletion policies
• Speedy deletion
• Misplaced Pages deletion
• Misplaced Pages categorization
• Pages automatically checked for accidental language links