Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 04:24, 23 March 2015

• /Archive 1 Created May 1. 2006
• /Archive 2 Created August 24, 2006
• /Archive 3 Created September 30, 2006
• /Archive 4 Created November 19, 2006
• /Archive 5 Created 05:43, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
• /Archive 6 Created 15:22, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
• /Archive 7 Created 04:36, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
• /Archive 08 Created 01:32, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
• /Archive 09 Created 05:30, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
• /Archive 10 Created --DHeyward (talk) 08:03, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
• /Archive 11 created --DHeyward (talk) 03:43, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
• /Archive 12 created --DHeyward (talk) 09:09, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
• /Archive 13
• /Archive 14
• /Archive 15
• /Archive 16
• /Archive 17

Please add comments to the bottom

Belle Knox AFD #2

The second AFD for Belle Knox has been overturned and relisted. As you commented on the original AFD, you may wish to comment on this one as well. As there have been developments and sources created since the time of the original AFD, please review to see if your comments/!vote are the same or may have changed. Gaijin42 (talk)

OR noticeboard

UTRS Account Request

I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. DHeyward (talk)

Heads up

Just a reminder. I have edited your post because I had recently discovered that he got blocked. Thus it had to be 24. Thank you. Delibzr (talk) 12:37, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Moving posts

Please do not move my comments on another editor's talk page as you did here. Dreadstar ☥ 15:57, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

@Dreadstar: No, I didn't move your post. Here's your post.. MarkBernstein removed it.. I restored with a ping to the two admins that he had an agreement with not to do that sort of thing as he deleted it rather quickly. . --DHeyward (talk) 16:19, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Per Misplaced Pages:Talk page guidelines#User talk pages, "users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages. Users may also remove some content in archiving. The removal of a warning is taken as evidence that the warning has been read by the user. ". More detail is provided here. Where did he agree not to remove comments/warnings? Dreadstar ☥ 16:26, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

I've been here 10 years. I am aware he can remove them. My intent was only to notify the two admins, in context, the warning you gave. I didn't just restore the warning, it was also a comment. I didn't care that he removed the warning, only that he has made agreements for his conduct with those two admins. He is/was free to remove my comment as well. --DHeyward (talk) 16:49, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Elevated cannon rights!

Nobody listens and some that claim to be "first on the button" seem to have both fingers in their ears. Maybe a few rounds will wake them up. --DHeyward (talk) 05:00, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration Enforcement

There's a discussion about you at Arbitration Enforcement. Have a wonderful day. MarkBernstein (talk) 22:04, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Suggestion from down low

A strong suggestion from me, a defrocked admin emeritus, is to not only stay away from all topics and persons related to GamerGate, but to run away! It is a battle not worth fighting and will do nothing but bring misery to all!--MONGO 13:08, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

• sigh* I try. --DHeyward (talk) 01:41, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Even if they don't topic ban you I'd run away from that cesspool. There are other areas that are of greater significance by a mile. We have much work to do in other areas that really do matter.--MONGO 01:56, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, I know. I rarely edit there and when I do, it's usually talk page (as the latest foray was removing a blog reference from the talk page that was unsuitable for reference in the article - it's still removed even though my objection was answered). I think anything coming from AE starting from a TBanned editor is out of process and I'd like to see a case from scratch, not anger fomenting that MB was TBanned. There is literally zero diffs of disruption, edit warring, presonal attacks or anything. I'm not that into the topic that I get emotionally involved and I am bewildered by those that apparently are. There is anger at MarkBernsteins TBan by some but it's not from any disruption or incivility or anything else that would be sanctionable. I'm baffled. --DHeyward (talk) 02:17, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

I hold those AE admins in high regard but there is no justice in a topic ban for you IMHO. I think one and all are just tired of anything related to that topic so any issue, no matter how slight, seems to be triggering the ban hammer.--MONGO 02:35, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

If that were true, I wouldn't be up on the board. --DHeyward (talk) 03:17, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

• I was referring to WP:ARCA. See statements by Hipocrite, TenOfAllTrades and the replies from Arb Thryduulf starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 05:41, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

No ping

It's a bit late to be telling you this, but I only just realised: you didn't ping MastCell with this. Pinging only works if you link and sign all in one edit. See . (He knows about it now, though, so no need to re-alert.) Bishonen | talk 22:57, 22 March 2015 (UTC).

No worries. You answered quick enough. Sorry anout my stalkers following me. --DHeyward (talk) 23:01, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

You think they did? I actually think all the people who posted in the thread probably watch my page. I've met them before, and they're welcome there. Bishonen | talk 23:48, 22 March 2015 (UTC).

It seemed odd. My simple question about whether a particular editor should be commenting in WP space turned into a spiral into off topic stuff. I didn't comment on it so if it's not concerning to you, no worries. --DHeyward (talk) 23:55, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

....