Misplaced Pages

User talk:Cassianto: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:12, 26 March 2015 view sourceDr. Blofeld (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors636,314 edits →Free for a PR?← Previous edit Revision as of 21:46, 26 March 2015 view source HJ Mitchell (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators121,948 edits →Arbitration request concerning you: new sectionNext edit →
Line 47: Line 47:


:::So Galadriel also blocked you Cass from editing your own page. Whatever happened to Freedom of Speech and NOT censored? The way some of them operate on here is as if they were trained in the Republic of Wadiya!♦ ] 11:11, 26 March 2015 (UTC) :::So Galadriel also blocked you Cass from editing your own page. Whatever happened to Freedom of Speech and NOT censored? The way some of them operate on here is as if they were trained in the Republic of Wadiya!♦ ] 11:11, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

== Arbitration request concerning you ==

Please see ]. Since you're blocked, you may wish to email any statement you wish to make to ArbCom. ] | ] 21:46, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:46, 26 March 2015

Please leave a message; I'll reply here.

    This is Cassianto's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.
    Shortcut
    Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12Auto-archiving period: 10 days 

    barnstar

    The Special Barnstar
    for suggesting that all should not respond to baiting, not just admins. But admins should since they have the blocking tool Wowee Zowee public (talk) 20:43, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
    • Thanks, but admins would not be allowed to use their tools if it were a personal thing. They would have to go elsewhere to ask someone else as otherwise it could be seen as a conflict of interests. If they did sort their problem out themselves, I would be asking questions. Cassianto 20:46, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

    The Tower House

    I've just lost all my bloody responses to you in an edit conflict! KJP1 (talk) 16:16, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

    Don't panic, go back one and copy and paste. Cassianto 16:17, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
    Think it worked. KJP1 (talk) 16:33, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

    Thankyou for your input into the peer review. The article is now at FAC. Cheers.♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:09, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

    Very much appreciate your input into the article and your Support. KJP1 (talk) 05:56, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

    Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Enthiran/archive2

    I have opened the 2nd PR as the article's first FAC is withdrawn due to MoS issues. Feel free to leave comments. — Ssven2 14:35, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

    Margaret Bondfield

    Last year you kindly contributed to the above article's peer review or or FAC or both. An issue has arisen from yesterday's TFA appearance, and is under discussion on the article's talk. Briefly: an editor added into the text the cited information that Bondfield's was privately known as "Maggie", and then incorporated this into the lead so the subject appeared as Margaret Grace ("Maggie") Bondfield. I have removed the nickname from the lead, and stated my position on the talkpage. I would be pleased if you could visit and briefly comment there. Brianboulton (talk) 16:39, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

    Free for a PR?

    Hi Cass, You were kind enough to comment at PR and FAC on Casino Royale; could I ask for a similar favour for the next instalment of the Bond series: Live and Let Die, which is now at PR? Any thoughts or comments would be greatly appreciated. Cheers – SchroCat (talk) 11:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

    File:GicondaSM.jpg
    Priceless!! Looks like he could be the love child of Prince Charles and Andy Carroll LOL. Hey Schro and Hafspajen, you're good with featured pictures, what do you reckon? Future Featured Picture candidate? Or future RFA candidate? That's no monkey minkey, it's Chimbo! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:12, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
    Whatever happened to "uninvolved" re: blocks? We hope (talk) 20:53, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
    Nowt surprises me round here any more! We've all seen much, much worse going on and no action taken, but if t's someone who has an opposing opinion to you, it's aneasy decision to take, - SchroCat (talk) 20:57, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

    So I'm being accused of being a racist now am I ? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:02, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

    And Cass was sent to solitary for saying he did not intend the comment to be racist. We hope (talk) 21:05, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

    Sledgehammer, nut, censorship, loss of perspective by an involved admin. Hands up who is surprised.... No? No takers? - SchroCat (talk) 21:18, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

    From the Ritz, Cass-the bread and water must be awful. We hope (talk) 21:27, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
    So Galadriel also blocked you Cass from editing your own page. Whatever happened to Freedom of Speech and NOT censored? The way some of them operate on here is as if they were trained in the Republic of Wadiya!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:11, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

    Arbitration request concerning you

    Please see WP:A/R/C. Since you're blocked, you may wish to email any statement you wish to make to ArbCom. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:46, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

    User talk:Cassianto: Difference between revisions Add topic