Revision as of 19:18, 1 April 2015 editLevelledout (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,042 edits →Electronic Cigarette: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:41, 1 April 2015 edit undoSPACKlick (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,193 edits →Electronic CigaretteNext edit → | ||
Line 933: | Line 933: | ||
Hi SPACKlick, further to our quick discussion on the article talk page I am now going to start going through the article, correcting the grammatical mistakes and re-wording sentences where the text either does not flow well or read easily. I'm fairly sure that there is quite a lot of this material in there so this should keep me occupied for a while! But I see that you have started making lists that are obviously intended for reordering things so I will try and leave the sentencing structure as untouched as possible and maybe we can combine our efforts at some point? I will also post a section on the article talk page soon linking to my sandbox so the issues can be discussed with other editors. In the meantime feel free to comment on any edits that I am making.] (]) 19:18, 1 April 2015 (UTC) | Hi SPACKlick, further to our quick discussion on the article talk page I am now going to start going through the article, correcting the grammatical mistakes and re-wording sentences where the text either does not flow well or read easily. I'm fairly sure that there is quite a lot of this material in there so this should keep me occupied for a while! But I see that you have started making lists that are obviously intended for reordering things so I will try and leave the sentencing structure as untouched as possible and maybe we can combine our efforts at some point? I will also post a section on the article talk page soon linking to my sandbox so the issues can be discussed with other editors. In the meantime feel free to comment on any edits that I am making.] (]) 19:18, 1 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
: Sounds cool, my overall listing is for topic structure rathern than grammar and wording within topics, if yu can neaten som eof the language and writing up then I can patch it into the revised structure at a later date, if I can ever finish the structure. It's soul destroying reading Quack's gibberish. ] (]) 19:41, 1 April 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:41, 1 April 2015
This page was last edited or modified by SPACKlick (talk).
Older Discussions
2012 x2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
2014 x25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2015 x 2 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Current Discussions
Proverbs of Hendyng
Hello SPACKlick! I just wanted to check why you undid my edit on cunt: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Cunt&oldid=649817267&diff=prev. I made an entry for the text, the Proverbs of Hendyng, which contains an early attestation of cunt and which is mentioned in that entry. Cunt previously linked to a similar but different text, the Proverbs of Alfred. I'm not sure why you reverted my edit so if you could let me know, that would be helpful! Alarichall (talk) 10:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Alarichall: short version is because I'm an idiot. Long version I misread who'd added what. I thought, for some reason, the new edit had added the Alfred easter egg link. I've undone it now. SPACKlick (talk) 10:56, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks! Alarichall (talk) 10:28, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Notification
I have asked for some clarification at WP:NPOVN#Gospel of Matthew: 50 CE. - Ret.Prof (talk) 02:25, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Re: Top Gear 2002
Hello, it's back at the right place, for now. Sorry about that ... I didn't intend the page to be gone for that long! I will do another move on it soon to complete the history merge. Graham87 12:50, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Formal mediation has been requested
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Lift (force)". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 31 March 2015.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 03:15, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Request for mediation accepted
The request for formal mediation of the dispute concerning Lift (force), in which you were listed as a party, has been accepted by the Mediation Committee. The case will be assigned to an active mediator within two weeks, and mediation proceedings should begin shortly thereafter. Proceedings will begin at the case information page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Lift (force), so please add this to your watchlist. Formal mediation is governed by the Mediation Committee and its Policy. The Policy, and especially the first two sections of the "Mediation" section, should be read if you have never participated in formal mediation. For a short guide to accepted cases, see the "Accepted requests" section of the Guide to formal mediation. You may also want to familiarise yourself with the internal Procedures of the Committee.
As mediation proceedings begin, be aware that formal mediation can only be successful if every participant approaches discussion in a professional and civil way, and is completely prepared to compromise. Please contact the Committee if anything is unclear.
For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 14:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
March 2015
Just a friendly reminder to sign your posts on talk pages. You didn't sign the last two on the Top Gear (2002) talk page, which makes it difficult for other editors to follow the flow of discussion, and who says what. --Drmargi (talk) 21:18, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
RFC's
2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
February 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Talk:2015 University of Oklahoma Sigma Alpha Epsilon racism incident |
---|
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2015 University of Oklahoma Sigma Alpha Epsilon racism incident. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 1 April 2015 (UTC) |
Electronic Cigarette
Hi SPACKlick, further to our quick discussion on the article talk page I am now going to start going through the article, correcting the grammatical mistakes and re-wording sentences where the text either does not flow well or read easily. I'm fairly sure that there is quite a lot of this material in there so this should keep me occupied for a while! But I see that you have started making lists that are obviously intended for reordering things so I will try and leave the sentencing structure as untouched as possible and maybe we can combine our efforts at some point? I will also post a section on the article talk page soon linking to my sandbox so the issues can be discussed with other editors. In the meantime feel free to comment on any edits that I am making.Levelledout (talk) 19:18, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- Sounds cool, my overall listing is for topic structure rathern than grammar and wording within topics, if yu can neaten som eof the language and writing up then I can patch it into the revised structure at a later date, if I can ever finish the structure. It's soul destroying reading Quack's gibberish. SPACKlick (talk) 19:41, 1 April 2015 (UTC)