Misplaced Pages

Talk:War Machine: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:40, 25 July 2006 editJustinpwilsonadvocate (talk | contribs)214 editsm Should this really be the destination page for []?: fix caps← Previous edit Revision as of 01:44, 25 July 2006 edit undoEVula (talk | contribs)39,066 edits Should this really be the destination page for []?: OpinionNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:


It strikes me that when most people think of "war machine" they think of ] or the ] or ] in general. At the same time, this is the only article with the specific title ], so I am not entirely comfortable changing this page's name to something like "War Machine (Comic Book)" and creating a redirect page for "War Machine" to collect the various uses. Does anyone here have any thoughts on what the correct solution to this problem might be? Thanks. ] 01:13, 25 July 2006 (UTC) It strikes me that when most people think of "war machine" they think of ] or the ] or ] in general. At the same time, this is the only article with the specific title ], so I am not entirely comfortable changing this page's name to something like "War Machine (Comic Book)" and creating a redirect page for "War Machine" to collect the various uses. Does anyone here have any thoughts on what the correct solution to this problem might be? Thanks. ] 01:13, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

:Until there are other articles that actually use the name "War Machine" (proper noun), there's no reason to move this article and create a disambig page. As it is, "War Machine" isn't mentioned a single time on ]. As such, the comic book character is the dominant usage of the phrase, meaning that it can stay in its place. Not a bad question, though, and it is one that I would expect (and hope) will get revisited in the future to ensure that the phrase hasn't become more common. ] 01:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:44, 25 July 2006

WikiProject iconComics Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Misplaced Pages. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

War Machine MAX

Could there be an addition of the War Machine MAX series?

Yes I think there should be (The Chuck Dixon one?) because it was controversial, being so right-wing.
Actually,I think it was Chuck Austen.

Second War Machine

Who exactly was the second War Machine, the one portrayed as a villain in Iron Man vol.3? I know that Rhodes recognized him as a former Stark employee. An update with more info on the villainous War Machine would be nice.

Should this really be the destination page for War Machine?

It strikes me that when most people think of "war machine" they think of militarism or the military industrial complex or military in general. At the same time, this is the only article with the specific title War Machine, so I am not entirely comfortable changing this page's name to something like "War Machine (Comic Book)" and creating a redirect page for "War Machine" to collect the various uses. Does anyone here have any thoughts on what the correct solution to this problem might be? Thanks. Justinpwilsonadvocate 01:13, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Until there are other articles that actually use the name "War Machine" (proper noun), there's no reason to move this article and create a disambig page. As it is, "War Machine" isn't mentioned a single time on Military-industrial complex. As such, the comic book character is the dominant usage of the phrase, meaning that it can stay in its place. Not a bad question, though, and it is one that I would expect (and hope) will get revisited in the future to ensure that the phrase hasn't become more common. EVula 01:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Categories: