| Revision as of 19:00, 26 July 2006 editRenamed user Sloane (talk | contribs)7,015 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:03, 26 July 2006 edit undoChuck0 (talk | contribs)995 edits →InfoshopNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| It's not a matter of what I think but what the source says. | It's not a matter of what I think but what the source says. | ||
| Alexa does not list Infoshop as the number one anarchist site, so the wiki should not claim it does. --] 19:00, 26 July 2006 (UTC) | Alexa does not list Infoshop as the number one anarchist site, so the wiki should not claim it does. --] 19:00, 26 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| : Do you run Infoshop? No. Are you a webmaster who understands anything about Alexa? It doesn't sound like it. You selected one way Alexa categorizes websites, which is one way of looking at popularity, but obviously a bad one because it erroneously lists UK Indymedia as the top anarchist website. UK Indymedia is not an anarchist website. The original statement is factual because when you look at '''actual''' anarchist websites that are listed on Alexa, Infoshop is the most popular. ] 19:03, 26 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:03, 26 July 2006
Content removed by subject.
Request
Chuck, could you start the article on Iain McKay? Or does he not wish it? -- infinity0 22:35, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia_talk:Censorship
A revised version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you kindly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much. Loom91 12:01, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
Bob Avakian
Hey Chuck, I'm having some trouble at the Bob Avakian page regarding the two sentences of criticism, which some anon supporter of the RCP wants deleted since they are merely "opinion" and not "fact". Of course this info is sourcable (and I sourced to your site in fact) and their reasons are fairly illogical. If you could provide some support, especially some more citations that would be great. The main discussion is here under "anti-RCP propaganda". Thanks in advance. The Ungovernable Force 23:00, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
C'mon
Hey, please chill out, ok. I'm not out to attack you or your project, I'm just think the criticism should be put it, but please don't turn a content dipute into a personal one. I hope you can see that this is merely a content dispute. I have nothing against you, and I hope you have nothing against me. See my talk page for a more detailed response. The Ungovernable Force 07:18, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Infoshop
It's not a matter of what I think but what the source says. Alexa does not list Infoshop as the number one anarchist site, so the wiki should not claim it does. --Peephole 19:00, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Do you run Infoshop? No. Are you a webmaster who understands anything about Alexa? It doesn't sound like it. You selected one way Alexa categorizes websites, which is one way of looking at popularity, but obviously a bad one because it erroneously lists UK Indymedia as the top anarchist website. UK Indymedia is not an anarchist website. The original statement is factual because when you look at actual anarchist websites that are listed on Alexa, Infoshop is the most popular. Chuck0 19:03, 26 July 2006 (UTC)