| Revision as of 08:48, 10 January 2004 view sourceNikola Smolenski (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users13,046 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:55, 30 April 2015 view source Maintenance script (talk | contribs)Bots398 editsm Maintenance script moved page User talk:ChrisO to User talk:ChrisO~enwiki without leaving a redirect: Automatically moved page while renaming the user "ChrisO" to "ChrisO~enwiki" | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| I don't know if you realize that your edits are not showing up as by you. | |||
| You've got to be logged in for them to show up under your user name not | |||
| the IP address you're using. Since you seem to be working from a lot of | |||
| different IPs, this is important. | |||
| You also get access to useful features like section editing, the "this is a minor change" checkbox, and watch lists if you make sure to log in first. | |||
| -- ] 22:19, 18 Oct 2003 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | |||
| Hi ChrisO :) I hope you like the place and choose to ]. | |||
| Some links that may be of use: | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] - ask questions you may have here, or leave a message on my ] | |||
| By the way, your last change to ] removed valid content and was biased to one point of view - which is against ] policy. We have to represent all points of view here :) | |||
| Thanks, and keep contributing! ] 01:20, 9 Nov 2003 (UTC) | |||
| I've moved the comment to my talk page, and replied to your concerns at ]. ] 01:43, 9 Nov 2003 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | |||
| Thanks for your contributions to the Scientology articles. In general, the editing here on Misplaced Pages is pretty much free-for-all, except for when edit wars break out. There are a number of folks keeping an eye on the Scientology articles, and I guess you've seen by now that this particular subject is ''very'' sensitive to some. (No, really?!?) | |||
| When I'm tired of looking at flames and serious stuff about anti-Semitism and the like, I find it relaxing to go and edit fun subjects for a change of pace. --] 00:04, 19 Nov 2003 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for getting involved in ]. ] 15:07, Dec 13, 2003 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | |||
| I left a note on ]. I hope you will contribute to more mideast articles as your knowledge of it appears uncommonly deep. --] 12:49, 21 Dec 2003 (UTC) | |||
| ------------ | |||
| ] is not ] ---] 09:38, 1 Jan 2004 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | |||
| Hi I'd just like to say youre re-write of the Kosovo War article is impressive. I've been saying it should be re-written for a long time ] 00:46, 3 Jan 2004 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | |||
| You've removed Albanian placenames from ], ] and ]. Please don't delete the alternative Albanian names for Kosovo and its communities - the names are internationally recognised as valid and (obviously) are used in Kosovo itself. We have a similar issue in the UK and Ireland, which is resolved in Misplaced Pages articles by giving both the anglicised and the Gaelic or Welsh version of placenames (see for instance ] (''Baile Átha Cliath'') or ] (''Caerdydd'')). In the same way, both Serbian and Albanian versions of placenames should be given in articles about Kosovo localities. -- ] 11:14, 9 Jan 2004 (UTC) | |||
| : Yes, I've removed them and will remove them again. Alternative names are where they should be - at the top of respective articles, from where I will never remove them. Alternative Albanian name for Kosovo is at the top of ] article, alternative name for Pristina is at the top of ] article, and alternative name for Racak should be at the top of ] article when it is created. But there is no need to put alternative names whenever they are mentioned, or parhaps you think that I should put ] (Beograd in ]) wherever Belgrade is mentione, ] (Jugoslavija in ]) wherever Yugoslavia is mentioned, ] (Srbija in ]) wherever Serbia is mentioned, ] (中國 in ], 中国 in ]) wherever China is mentioned... By the way, these are not Albanian names, but Serbian names in Albanian language. I don't see enough paralells between Kosovo and Wales, and think that this decision was also wrong (but won't remove them as I don't care that much). I also don't see that names are "internationally" (regardless of what it means) recognised as valid. ] 08:48, 10 Jan 2004 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:55, 30 April 2015
Redirect to: