| Revision as of 00:03, 16 August 2010 view sourceMinor4th (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,501 editsm →4 reverts on Michael Mann← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:55, 30 April 2015 view source Maintenance script (talk | contribs)Bots398 editsm Maintenance script moved page User talk:ChrisO to User talk:ChrisO~enwiki without leaving a redirect: Automatically moved page while renaming the user "ChrisO" to "ChrisO~enwiki" | ||
| (82 intermediate revisions by 27 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| ''Old discussions now at ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ]'' | |||
| '''Please add new comments below.''' | |||
| == Have a barnstar! == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | {{#if: {{ifequal|{{{2}}}|alt}}|]|]}} | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Barnstar of Good Humor''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Your ] was rather funny. Thanks for a good laugh! <small>--]: ]</small> 22:27, 3 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == Note == | |||
| - The version you presented as my proposed text was '''''not''''' what I proposed. I've edited your comment to reflect what I actually proposed. Normally I would not edit a comment, but this was clearly a mistake on your part and one other editor had already commented that my version was too long, so I felt it needed to be corrected before others saw it. ] (]) 01:48, 4 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == DYK == | |||
| It's verified and ready to go. The infobox needs to be filled out a bit though. I'm sure 1935 is the correct date even though it's been changed since then. | |||
| Anyway this was in ]: | |||
| {{fmbox | |||
| | image = ] | |||
| | text = <div style="font-size:1.4em; font-weight:bold;">Attention</div> | |||
| Your IP address ] will be logged by the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc and disseminated publicly. Violators of our ] can and will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law by the <big>''']'''</big>, which takes such offenses very seriously. Criminal violations include but are not limited to defacement, knowingly providing false information, and/or uploading copyrighted material without permission from rights holders, any of which can be punished by fines, imprisonment, and a term of ] during which you may be restricted by the court from accessing a computer or the Internet. You may also be subject to civil suit by the Wikimedia Foundation, resulting in disgorging of your assets and/or ] of wages to satisfy the judgment. You irrevocably agree to release your contributions under the ] License and the ]. | |||
| }} | |||
| ] ] 20:54, 4 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :LOL! | |||
| :Actually 1941 ''is'' the correct date - the seal was created in 1940 and first used in January 1941. -- ] (]) 21:01, 4 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| I'm afraid the character count is still not okay, can you add some more to make it ready for DYK? --] (]) 07:06, 5 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::*] ] ] 16:03, 6 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| *While I'm not sure that this adds much, this piece of at least indicates the spread of sealgate. Perhaps not worth adding, good luck with the more academic and historical research. . . ], ] 18:13, 8 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Voluntary CC article restriction== | |||
| Please consider signing the CC restriction, as explained . ] (]) 01:37, 6 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Andrew Montford == | |||
| Chris, could you respond ], please, whether you've read Montford's book? You've made some strong claims about it, claims that I don't think would be made by someone who'd read it, and it's directly relevant to the issue of how we judge expertise. <font color="blue">]</font> <small><sup><font color="red">]</font><font color="green">]</font></sup></small> 02:11, 10 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :No thank you, I already told you that I'm not interested in rehashing the RSN discussion. -- ] (]) 07:08, 10 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::If you really haven't read it, I suggest you do, because your description of it isn't accurate. <font color="blue">]</font> <small><sup><font color="red">]</font><font color="green">]</font></sup></small> 07:11, 10 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::But did you read it? A simple yes/no will do. ] (]) 12:14, 10 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==DYK nomination of Milan Paumer== | |||
| ] Hello! Your submission of ] at the ] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Milan Paumer|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> ] (]) 00:04, 11 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :nice work, but it's missing in line refs ] (]) 00:05, 11 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::ready for DYK . ] (]) 00:40, 11 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Heidi Klum's husband == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | {{#if: {{ifequal|{{{2}}}|alt}}|]|]}} | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I know we've argued sometimes in the past, but I have to congratulate you on your integrity. Jimbo's comments on T:TDYK, I feel, were anathema to the entire point of this wiki, and are, to me, tantamount to allowing the government to needlessly interfere with the running of the encyclopedia. We need more editors to not bow to such pressures. ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 02:38, 11 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :Chris, I'm afraid I have to take an opposite position. I've probably agreed with you more than not on most other issues. I agree that the FBI's position was asinine. But a DYK on this article smacks of retaliation for the FBI complaint. I just think it's a bad move and I really hope that you'll reconsider and withdraw the DYK nomination. ] (]) 13:45, 12 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::As I said on Jimbo's page, I think your compromise proposal is a very good one. Thanks for your flexibility on this. ] (]) 17:40, 12 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==DYK for Attorney General of Virginia's climate science investigation== | |||
| {{tmbox | |||
| |tyle = notice | |||
| |small = | |||
| |image = ] | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and add it to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }} -- ''']''' (]) 06:02, 11 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Nice article. Well done. ] ] 15:22, 11 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Your comment at JW's talk page == | |||
| Concerning at Jimbo Wales' talk page, I refer you to ]. -- ] (]) 17:31, 12 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I have no idea what you are no about, I am a neutral and care less apart from the wikipedia. ] (]) 17:34, 12 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Come off it, you've been following me around for some time. -- ] (]) 17:37, 12 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::I have not, I do my thing to protect living people and to support the wikipedia foundation as I see fit and am able, if you bounce off me because of that then lets try to contribute something together. ] (]) 17:41, 12 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Global Warning skepticism == | |||
| You put the deletion discussion on the wrong place. It's supposed to go on the ], not inside another discussion. <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, his otters and a clue-bat • <sup>(] • ] • ])</sup> 17:07, 13 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Sorry, my bad. Thanks for fixing it! -- ] (]) 17:09, 13 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Please refactor == | |||
| "anti-science bloviations" and "crank" are not BLP-permissible labels, even on talk pages. Please refactor immediately. ] (]) 15:18, 15 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Don't be silly. -- ] (]) 15:19, 15 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Then I will. ] (]) 15:26, 15 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::Are you actively trying to get yourself topic-banned, or do you just not care any more? -- ] (]) 15:26, 15 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Scottish Review of Books== | |||
| I'm afraid your recent edit to the ] concerning the ''Scottish Review of Books'' deleted a number of posts, which I've restored. I've also answered your question about which Alastair McIntosh wrote that review. -- ] (]) 16:20, 15 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Sorry about that - and thanks for fixing it. Must have been a copy-and-paste error after the edit conflict, though I can't quite see how I managed to do it. ] (]) 16:26, 15 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == 4 reverts on Michael Mann == | |||
| Please self revert your latest, you are in violation of 3RR. ] (]) 23:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Don't be silly (again). Reverts of banned users are not counted. -- ] (]) 23:43, 15 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::You are not reverting banned users. You are removing sourced information and including quotes that are non-existent in the cited refs. You revereted Mark nutley and me and another non-sock, non-banned editor. Knock it off. <b class="nounderlines" style="border:1px solid #999;background:#fff"><span style="font-family:papyrus,serif">]]</span></b> 00:03, 16 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:55, 30 April 2015
Redirect to: