Revision as of 14:44, 3 May 2015 editAcroterion (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators232,436 edits →May 2015: topic ban notice← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:45, 3 May 2015 edit undoAcroterion (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators232,436 edits →Topic ban: change topic ban to indefNext edit → | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
==Topic ban== | ==Topic ban== | ||
Due to your disruptive behavior on ] I'm imposing upon you |
Due to your disruptive behavior on ] I'm imposing upon you an indefinite ban on all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed per ]. Additionally, you are blocked for one week for edit-warring to insert violations of the ]. '''<font face="Arial">] <small>]</small></font>''' 14:43, 3 May 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:45, 3 May 2015
Gamergate Edits
Please carefully read this information:The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.Amortias (T)(C) 01:06, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
May 2015
This is your only warning; if you violate Misplaced Pages's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Misplaced Pages page again, as you did at Arthur Chu, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dave Dial (talk) 13:24, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
I was just revealing a fact. Eqqy (talk) 14:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for contravening Misplaced Pages's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Acroterion (talk) 14:40, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Topic ban
Due to your disruptive behavior on Arthur Chu I'm imposing upon you an indefinite ban on all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed per Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate. Additionally, you are blocked for one week for edit-warring to insert violations of the biographies of living persons policy. Acroterion (talk) 14:43, 3 May 2015 (UTC)