Revision as of 18:37, 13 May 2015 editAtsme (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers42,804 editsm Reverted edits by Jytdog (talk) to last version by Atsme← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:37, 13 May 2015 edit undoJytdog (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers187,951 edits Undid revision 662188930 by Atsme (talk) DO NOT CHANGE MY COMMENTSNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
History of this essay is: | History of this essay is: | ||
* and its talk page | |||
* and its talk page | |||
* and its talk page | * and its talk page | ||
* and see ] for deletion discussion of first version. ] (]) 15:28, 13 May 2015 (UTC) | * and see ] for deletion discussion of first version. ] (]) 15:28, 13 May 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:37, 13 May 2015
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Advocacy ducks page. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3 |
Misplaced Pages essays Low‑impact | ||||||||||
|
History
History of this essay is:
- here and its talk page
- here and its talk page
- here and its talk page
- and see Misplaced Pages:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_Interest_ducks for deletion discussion of first version. Jytdog (talk) 15:28, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- as my colleague states thru the above links the history of these essays is quite clear and serve no purpose--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:45, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, but I wasn't quite finished getting this essay moved, so if you and your colleague will please be patient and let me complete my work, it would be much appreciated. Atsme 16:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- as my colleague states thru the above links the history of these essays is quite clear and serve no purpose--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:45, 13 May 2015 (UTC)