User talk:Ivecos: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 19:09, 18 March 2015 editIvecos (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers6,239 edits →top: Well vacations over. Back to studies and being bored out of my mind. Fuck!← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:55, 25 May 2015 edit undoMywikieditbh (talk \| contribs)333 editsNo edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit →
Line 12:		Line 12:
	\|align="center" width="100%"\|<font face="Comic Sans MS" font color="red">. <big><big><big><big>শারদীয় শুভেচ্ছা<big></big></big></big></big> <span style="color:black">(Saradiya Greetings)</span>		\|align="center" width="100%"\|<font face="Comic Sans MS" font color="red">. <big><big><big><big>শারদীয় শুভেচ্ছা<big></big></big></big></big> <span style="color:black">(Saradiya Greetings)</span>



			WIKIPEDIA TERE BAAP KI NI HAI BHENCHOD. Jaa kar apni ammi chuda saale bengali. Bengal ki page edit kiya kar haraamkhor. Bihar ke page pe taang adaane ki zurrat na kariyo bhen ke lode.

	<big><big>ঢাকের তালে কোমর দোলে, খুশিতে নাচে মন <br/>		<big><big>ঢাকের তালে কোমর দোলে, খুশিতে নাচে মন <br/>
Line 29:		Line 32:


	<!-- <span style="color:indigo;">'''Please leave me new messages at ~~the bottom of the page.</span>'''~~		<!-- <span style="color:indigo;">'''Please leave me new messages at t
	{{bots\|deny=DPL bot}}
	{{busy\|'''<span style="color:indigo;">SHIVAM SETU</span>''' <small>''(]-]-]-])''</small>}}
	{{discouraged}}
	{{talkheader}}-->
	<span></small>
	<!-- {{User:Shivamsetu/template/Archives template}} {{User unavailable}} -->
	<sub>Subscript text</sub>

	==Orphaned non-free image File:NIFT Patna logo.jpg==		==Orphaned non-free image File:NIFT Patna logo.jpg==

Revision as of 06:55, 25 May 2015

It is 11:37 PM where this user lives in Patna, India .

Ivecos is busy and is going to be on Misplaced Pages in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Stefan2 (talk) 16:40, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bihar Police Logo.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Bihar Police Logo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Misplaced Pages (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Fallschirmjäger ✉ 17:19, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bihar Police Logo.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Bihar Police Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:36, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews

Hello Ivecos. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.

The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.

If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)

If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Misplaced Pages to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.

Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.

I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).

Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

With warm regards

Thank you for the concern for safeguard of Misplaced Pages principles which I too and do have.This concern must be transparent which is not in my case.Merely a person's face with any type of gesture is not at all unnecessary till the face and gesture is in the prime focus of a photo.In my case, adding to this, the faces of the crowd are out of focus, blurred and unidentifiable, with the prime focus rests on the absolute subject.This proves there is no self promotion at all but the promotion of folks only.Let me clarify the folks in the photo do not, again, do not relate to the photographer. Finally, no definite number of images of a subject or an object can be said to portray it completely.Either one or none! If you still possess any obligation regarding my contribution to the Misplaced Pages, I welcome it. Avanish Kumar (talk) 17:10, 20 February 2015 (UTC)Indiavanish

Thanks for support

Please be assured, there is nothing like discouragement.I feel supported by your clarifications,for which I'm thankful.There is a lot to learn for me.Again, thank you for your support.Avanish Kumar (talk) 18:09, 22 February 2015 (UTC)Indiavanish