Misplaced Pages

User talk:119.235.2.125: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:21, 6 June 2015 editGlane23 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers69,284 edits Level 2 warning re. Chitral Somapala (HG)← Previous edit Revision as of 17:31, 6 June 2015 edit undoRoadWarrior445 (talk | contribs)989 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:


<div style=clear: both></div>] Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at ] with <span class="plainlinks"></span>. Your edits appear to constitute ] and have been ] or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. ] have the ability to ] users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-2 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --><font face="Bauhaus 93" color="blue" size="2">Geoff</font> <sup><font color="blue">''Who, me?'' </font></sup> 15:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC) <div style=clear: both></div>] Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at ] with <span class="plainlinks"></span>. Your edits appear to constitute ] and have been ] or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. ] have the ability to ] users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-2 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --><font face="Bauhaus 93" color="blue" size="2">Geoff</font> <sup><font color="blue">''Who, me?'' </font></sup> 15:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br>
Please be particularly aware that ] states:
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''.
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''{{Break}}''Actually, you've already broken 3RR and I'm currently writing a report on this.''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] (]) 17:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:31, 6 June 2015

June 2015

Information icon Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Chitral Somapala— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:14, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Chitral Somapala with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Geoff 15:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chitral Somapala. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Actually, you've already broken 3RR and I'm currently writing a report on this. RoadWarrior445 (talk) 17:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC)