| Revision as of 19:09, 11 June 2015 editSchaengel (talk | contribs)195 edits →Page ownership← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:22, 11 June 2015 edit undoTaxiarchos228 (talk | contribs)388 edits →Page ownershipNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| In addition to the warning about edit-warring, given just above, let me address ''what'' you're warring about. It seems to me that you're edit-warring to prevent others from removing your own picture, and it looks like you're acting as if you personally get to control what images are used on these pages. Please read the ] policy (it's similar to the ] policy), which prohibits what I think you're doing. And please don't again revert when someone removes your picture from one or more articles: if you keep going, you will be blocked without further warning. ] (]) 18:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC) | In addition to the warning about edit-warring, given just above, let me address ''what'' you're warring about. It seems to me that you're edit-warring to prevent others from removing your own picture, and it looks like you're acting as if you personally get to control what images are used on these pages. Please read the ] policy (it's similar to the ] policy), which prohibits what I think you're doing. And please don't again revert when someone removes your picture from one or more articles: if you keep going, you will be blocked without further warning. ] (]) 18:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :OK I will remove me vom Misplaced Pages. The german wikipedia doesn´t need any authors anymore. --] (]) 19:09, 11 June 2015 (UTC) | :OK I will remove me vom Misplaced Pages. The german wikipedia doesn´t need any authors anymore. --] (]) 19:09, 11 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ::If this is your opinion it's sad but unavoidable. I estimated your work but this is not a complimentary ticket for all activities. As I already mentioned many times to you this evening: Misplaced Pages grow up like this because it's a collaborative project. Non of us could manage this huge collection of knowledge, non of us is perfect. Not you, not I, simply nobody. So it's is important to talk to each other and try to understand the arguments of the counterpart. I tried to understand you, but as you're not willing for conversation this venture will fail. If your attitude is that you're work at wikipedia is sacrosanct and you aren't open for new ideas and inputs maybe this project is not the right think to you. I have written in more than ten years over 1000 new articles (many with architectural topic, also many churches) and it is not a fault to discuss controversial. But it's a fault NOT to talk together. Although you are a bit opinionated I am willing to discuss and therefore I opened this topics in the contested articles. It's your decision. If you revert me again and prefer to turn your's back on wikipedia good luck and all the best. --] (]) 19:22, 11 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:22, 11 June 2015
Welcome!
Welcome to Misplaced Pages, Schaengel! I am Marek69 and have been editing Misplaced Pages for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Misplaced Pages! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
Marek.69 23:57, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
June 2015
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Koblenz. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Weegeerunner 17:17, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Notice
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Disturbing edits by user:Schaengel. Thank you. Weegeerunner 17:20, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Page ownership
In addition to the warning about edit-warring, given just above, let me address what you're warring about. It seems to me that you're edit-warring to prevent others from removing your own picture, and it looks like you're acting as if you personally get to control what images are used on these pages. Please read the WP:OWN policy (it's similar to the de:WP:EAA policy), which prohibits what I think you're doing. And please don't again revert when someone removes your picture from one or more articles: if you keep going, you will be blocked without further warning. Nyttend (talk) 18:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- OK I will remove me vom Misplaced Pages. The german wikipedia doesn´t need any authors anymore. --Schaengel (talk) 19:09, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- If this is your opinion it's sad but unavoidable. I estimated your work but this is not a complimentary ticket for all activities. As I already mentioned many times to you this evening: Misplaced Pages grow up like this because it's a collaborative project. Non of us could manage this huge collection of knowledge, non of us is perfect. Not you, not I, simply nobody. So it's is important to talk to each other and try to understand the arguments of the counterpart. I tried to understand you, but as you're not willing for conversation this venture will fail. If your attitude is that you're work at wikipedia is sacrosanct and you aren't open for new ideas and inputs maybe this project is not the right think to you. I have written in more than ten years over 1000 new articles (many with architectural topic, also many churches) and it is not a fault to discuss controversial. But it's a fault NOT to talk together. Although you are a bit opinionated I am willing to discuss and therefore I opened this topics in the contested articles. It's your decision. If you revert me again and prefer to turn your's back on wikipedia good luck and all the best. --– Wladyslaw (talk) 19:22, 11 June 2015 (UTC)