Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 17:31, 28 June 2015

ES:DONTS

Your editsummary contains strong language. 'your threats' is a grave accusation. Per WP:ESDONTS, this is unacceptable. OTOH, I'm glad to see that within two months of editing you already have profound knowledge about good behaviour, as the second part of the your es shows. You may apply that to CAMERA too, instead of starting an editwar. -DePiep (talk) 09:20, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015

Your recent editing history at Meretz shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 09:32, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the warning. I guess you left the same message to Archwayh, who also keeps adding unsourced content against consensus.--Averysoda (talk) 09:54, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

No -- because that editor has only reverted twice. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 10:53, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

• Actually, come to think of it, you will want to be familiar with WP:ARBPIA, in particular the WP:1RR rule. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 10:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

IRR infraction. Please revert, and address your concerns to the talk page

• 02:21, 14 June 2015‎ Ist revert
• 08:39, 14 June 2015‎ 2nd revert

Your second revert also has an illogical edit summary. in that case, this picture must be removed also per NPOV and balance.

The posed photo (admitted by the woman who took it) was discussed at length, with no agreement on its inclusion. The other photo was never questioned, and NPOV doesn’t count since the Palestinian photo is balanced by a photo of an Israeli children’s school. If anything, earlier, the Palestinian photo was sandwiched between two Israeli photos, and on those grounds alone the version prior to my edit violated Npov.

Revert and address the talk page.Nishidani (talk) 09:49, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 14 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Har Homa page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Israel Pritzker

Why do you revert wikifying of Israel Pritzker? Gui le Roi (talk) 09:00, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

First you should create the article, then add internal links. That's how it works. Are you planning to create an article about Israel Pritzker?--Averysoda (talk) 09:01, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Crossing the Red Sea

That was just another hoax. See the disclaimer at and this Snopes article. as well as its current front page (if you wait, you'll see a story about Saturn perhaps being downgraded from its planet status).. Doug Weller (talk) 10:40, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

FYI

Hello Averysoda. I saw your edit summary here. Since it was a rotating set of IPs making the same edit reporting them probably would not have stopped things so I went ahead and filed and WP:RFPP. Based on that the article was protected for four days. It is possible (likely?) that this person will return after the protection expires so please feel free to report them again if that happens. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 00:18, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

DS

I believe you are probably already aware of these, but as you have not recieved a formal notice, here you go. {{Ivm|2=This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Pluto2012 (talk) 06:19, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

lol! The pot calling the kettle black.--Averysoda (talk) 10:50, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Pretty funny stuff considering not 10 minutes later he said this kind of thing is childish and that you should let the other editor know what specifically prompted you to give the warning. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 21:00, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Leaving warnings related to unsourced material

Hi! You recently reverted an unsourced edit on Quds Day. In the future, I strongly encourage you to place an appropriate template on the user's talk page when you do this. One such template for unsourced information is {{uw-unsourced#}} where the # should be substituted for a numeral from 1 to 4 depending on severity and number of past warnings. By warning the user of their behavior and making them aware of policies, you can often help turn them into a productive contributor to the project, which is in everyone's interests. Thanks for your contributions! ~ Rob 09:48, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Ok. I'll do that. Thanks.--Averysoda (talk) 10:50, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

1RR violation

You broke 1RR at Semiramis Hotel bombing. I suggest you revert yourself before someone reports you. Zero 11:24, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

I thought reverting anonymous IP didn't count within 1RR, but I reverted myself anyway.--Averysoda (talk) 21:20, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Reverting IPs doesn't count towards 1RR. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 04:38, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Discussion about Christian Persecution Category

Hi! You were recently involved in some disagreement at the article on the Semiramis Hotel bombing over whether ] should be added to it. This is currently being discussed on the article's talk page. Please head over there to discuss your thoughts about this and reach a consensus. In the meantime, please keep the page as it is and do not edit war. ~ Rob 11:43, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Stalking and automatic reverts.

I am listing every revert you make on pages you haven't edited but which I do. That is stalking, and you are almost absent on talk pages. This will be sanctioned if you persist.Nishidani (talk) 20:52, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Don't be so paranoid. I have a long watchlist of Arab-Israel conflict-related articles. I'm not scared by your threats, I'm not violating any rule.--Averysoda (talk) 21:04, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

you are. It's a pattern, a conduct issue, as I will show if this persists.Nishidani (talk) 21:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

I would appreciate if you stop addressing my talk page for this nonsense. Your aggressive editing in Misplaced Pages, which includes citing irrelevant POV-pushing opinions by anti-Israel sites, won't succeed. Unlike your last edits here, this is not a personal attack or threat, I have nothing against you, but I won't let you ruin this encyclopedia because you have certain political agenda.--Averysoda (talk) 21:19, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Recep Tayyip Erdogan

Go and read about him if you manage his Misplaced Pages page. Without knowing Turkish, you really behave like an ignorant idiot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.54.222.28 (talk) 03:49, 26 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.111.110.109 (talk)

A kitten for you!

Thank you for the kind acknowldgements, it helps!

Miraclexix (talk) 13:33, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Battle of Shuja'iyya

Please read WP:Biographies of living persons, especially WP:BLPTALK. If you can't discuss Max Blumenthal without letting your personal feelings get the better of you, perhaps you shouldn't be discussing him. — Malik Shabazz /_Stalk 15:48, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

I was answering to Nishidani with arguments, not "personal feelings". I'm not a hippie.--Averysoda (talk) 15:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Smearing a living author is not acceptable. Please take my advice and strike the offensive opinions out. Thank you.Nishidani (talk) 17:12, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Why don't you answer my point with arguments instead of threats and meaningless adjectives like "offensive"?--Averysoda (talk) 17:22, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Well, I've been patient. I've reported this incident here.Nishidani (talk) 17:31, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

History of Israel

Thanks. I added sources.