| Revision as of 18:23, 31 July 2006 editSamsara (talk | contribs)27,603 edits I see no reason for complaint - all the dictionary definitions are met← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:53, 31 July 2006 edit undoKarlV (talk | contribs)190 edits →Internment CampNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| :As for the content of your edit, I can only emphasise once again that the prison at Bad Nenndorf meets all the formal criteria of a concentration camp, even if the sources do not use that particular word: http://en.wiktionary.org/Concentration_camp | :As for the content of your edit, I can only emphasise once again that the prison at Bad Nenndorf meets all the formal criteria of a concentration camp, even if the sources do not use that particular word: http://en.wiktionary.org/Concentration_camp | ||
| :Kind regards, ] (] • ]) 18:23, 31 July 2006 (UTC) | :Kind regards, ] (] • ]) 18:23, 31 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :*First of all I think that I am complying with the formal criteria of the article ]. And your mentioned article is, instead of that I have mentioned without good sources (see e.g. definition). Secondly, what is that, there are good sources, no one of them is talking about ''concentration camps'' but because of a definition, which IMHO seems to be POV, you want to tell me, that, even the sources do not use that particular word, it meets formal criterias? Criterias which are not proved? So, you want to tell me, that we do not need sources? Third - no, I do not want to bring in an error in this article, but, there was a German User (who was now suspended because of vandalism, plese be so kind an inform yourself), who wants that the British Internment camp is called concentration camp, which is simply wrong (see the sources and the formal criteria of the article internment camp). See what happened with the German article and the User. So I want to bring an error out of this artcle and nothing else. And you?--] 19:53, 31 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:53, 31 July 2006
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. | Upload |
Internment Camp
Some contributors of the German and English page do not read the sources adequately. In no one of the sources (Guardien nor Die Zeit) the internment camp of Bad Nenndorf was named concentration camp. This is absolutely wrong and POV. --KarlV 14:33, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- We would like you to discuss first. Violating the 3rr-rule is an abslolutly no-go here. I like Burke's Peerage 15:10, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- KarlV, I am not sure what your particular concerns are. You have claimed inaccuracy and POV, and have chosen to frame your concern in terms that could be interpreted as a personal attack on fellow editors, but you have given no justification for your claims. This and your 3RR violation make you less likely to be taken seriously.
- As for the content of your edit, I can only emphasise once again that the prison at Bad Nenndorf meets all the formal criteria of a concentration camp, even if the sources do not use that particular word: http://en.wiktionary.org/Concentration_camp
- Kind regards, Samsara (talk • contribs) 18:23, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- First of all I think that I am complying with the formal criteria of the article Internment camp. And your mentioned article is, instead of that I have mentioned without good sources (see e.g. definition). Secondly, what is that, there are good sources, no one of them is talking about concentration camps but because of a definition, which IMHO seems to be POV, you want to tell me, that, even the sources do not use that particular word, it meets formal criterias? Criterias which are not proved? So, you want to tell me, that we do not need sources? Third - no, I do not want to bring in an error in this article, but, there was a German User (who was now suspended because of vandalism, plese be so kind an inform yourself), who wants that the British Internment camp is called concentration camp, which is simply wrong (see the sources and the formal criteria of the article internment camp). See what happened with the German article and the User. So I want to bring an error out of this artcle and nothing else. And you?--KarlV 19:53, 31 July 2006 (UTC)