Misplaced Pages

User talk:Kris, Victoria = 5: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:47, 1 May 2015 editKris, Victoria = 5 (talk | contribs)410 editsNo edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:45, 4 July 2015 edit undoKris, Victoria = 5 (talk | contribs)410 edits New talk section: SockpuppetingTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 
(8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Kazima ==

Hello, this is just a request to stop adding unsourced information to the page "]". You've repeatedly added information pertaining to future plots, notably the apparent departure of the character of Kazima, completely without any references or sources. You even left a message on my talk page to ask that I stop deleting 'good sourced information'. However, your edits about Kazima are unsourced - and as you are the only person saying that Kazima will leave, I have no option but to revert your edits. No plot information is known regarding future episodes of The Dumping Ground - the next episode is in September, there's no way we would know about it, or Kazima's fate, until nearer the time.

Unless you can provide a valid source to support your claim of Kazima leaving The Dumping Ground in episode 11 of the series, I will continue to revert your edits. ] (]) 16:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

== March 2015 (blocked) == == March 2015 (blocked) ==
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for disruptive editing, especially . If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''My brother was on my account for two weeks I did not do this, I understand if you want to block me because he was rude and it is my responsiblity but before I went to Japan for two weeks, I made some good edits''}}. However, you should read the ] first. &nbsp;] &#124; ] 09:50, 18 March 2015 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for disruptive editing, especially . If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''My brother was on my account for two weeks I did not do this, I understand if you want to block me because he was rude and it is my responsiblity but before I went to Japan for two weeks, I made some good edits''}}. However, you should read the ] first. &nbsp;] &#124; ] 09:50, 18 March 2015 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block -->
Line 16: Line 10:


*Hello, I understand if you want to block me, but I really want it to expire. ] (]) 05:41, 19 March 2015 (UTC) *Hello, I understand if you want to block me, but I really want it to expire. ] (]) 05:41, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

== Sockpuppeting ==

Who is accusing me of sockpupperting, I am not playing such childish games.





] (]) 01:45, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:45, 4 July 2015

March 2015 (blocked)

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, especially this edit. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=My brother was on my account for two weeks I did not do this, I understand if you want to block me because he was rude and it is my responsiblity but before I went to Japan for two weeks, I made some good edits}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Bishonen | talk 09:50, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kris, Victoria = 5 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My brother was on my account for two weeks I did not do this, I understand if you want to block me because he was rude and it is my responsiblity but before I went to Japan for two weeks, I made some good edits

Decline reason:

In that case, this account is compromised, and cannot be unblocked. Yunshui  15:00, 18 March 2015 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Comment: so is your brother the "Kris" part of the account name? Blaming your little brother isn't something that's taken very seriously on Misplaced Pages: click on the link to see why. Even apart from that, neither you nor your little brother has explained why your very account name itself sounds like it refers to at least two people. I've asked you, and merely had my question blanked. I'd like to hear a convincing explanation. Bishonen | talk 14:40, 18 March 2015 (UTC).
  • Hi Bioshen, I am Kris, I left to work in Japan for two weeks, I understand if 'blaming my little brother' isn't taken seriously, but its not my fault honestly, I made up that random name, it has my surname. My explanation is that, I know if you may not want to unblock me because it is parly my fault that he did it. Please have another think, when does this block expire? Kris, Victoria = 5 (talk) 21:21, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
  • It is an indefinite block meaning that it does not have a definite or fixed duration. It does not mean that the block is infinite, you may be unblocked in appropriate circumstances.--5 albert square (talk) 21:57, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Actually no, that's not an option anymore (and that's without even taking the sockpuppetry into account). Basically, if someone else has access to this account, we can no longer be certain whether the original account holder has control of the account - with no committed identity in place on this account, there is no way to verify whether we are communicating with the original account holder or the person who has hacked the account. There are therefore no circumstances under which this account will be unblocked. Note that creating a new account is also not an option, since it appears that you have already been abusing multiple accounts. At this point, your most likely route to editing Misplaced Pages again is to take the standard offer and appeal in six months from your original account. Note that "most likely" is a long way from "definite". 22:05, 18 March 2015 (UTC) (message from Yunshui)

Sockpuppeting

Who is accusing me of sockpupperting, I am not playing such childish games.



Kris, Victoria = 5 (talk) 01:45, 4 July 2015 (UTC)