Misplaced Pages

:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:18, 31 July 2015 editFinngall (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Rollbackers34,275 edits →East wind condos: four speedies, thrice per A11← Previous edit Revision as of 13:36, 31 July 2015 edit undoGeo Swan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers112,843 edits →Daphne Lee MartinNext edit →
Line 459: Line 459:


::You are free to try again, preferably going through ] because it is clear you have a conflict of interest on this topic. ~] <small>(])</small> 20:37, 30 July 2015 (UTC) ::You are free to try again, preferably going through ] because it is clear you have a conflict of interest on this topic. ~] <small>(])</small> 20:37, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

::* I was quite surprised by what struck me as a tone of non-cooperation here. I went to refresh my memory as to the wording of ], and ]. I don't see either wikidocument saying ''"As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else"''. <p>I then used our internal search engine, to search the entire wikipedia for this specific phrase {{ping|Jéské Couriano}} used. It turned up 21 instances. The first was ]. The other 20 instances are all places where ] ''used'' this template: ], ], ],], ], ], ], ],], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ]. <p>Do either ] or ] require a complete rewrite from scratch? G11 says it should be applied to articles that require a ''"fundamental rewrite"''. <p>Who says ''"fundamental rewrite"'' is synonymous with a ''"complete rewrite from scratch"''? <p>My understanding of the administrator's mandate is that administrator's actions are not, generally, supposed to be punitive, rather, they are supposed to be educational. Aren't even blocks supposed to be educational, a way of getting the attention of contributors who have ignored warnings that they have been making serious lapses from policy? <p>It seems to me that forcing someone to rewrite an article, from scratch, is punitive. They have to go and find references, all over again. {{ping|DameCalico}} seems to be a newbie, and I think the responses here are lapses from ]. A newbie has to figure out, all over again,the templates we use for references, and how we format lists and tables. Unnecessarily making them learn all that, a second time, is deeply punitive. <p>In my opinion, there is no notable topic that can't be written from a neutral point of view. <p>I don't know ], ] or ], and I had never heard of ]. But I just googled her, and, if DameCalico is correct, and the deleted article did contain sufficient valid reference, I'll bet that the neutralizing bias-ectomy that a successful G11 requires is actually trivial. <p>I request userification, so I can test to see whether the neutralizing bias-ectomy is as trivial as I suspect. ] (]) 13:34, 31 July 2015 (UTC)


==User:Animall/Cardio First Angel== ==User:Animall/Cardio First Angel==

Revision as of 13:36, 31 July 2015

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Misplaced Pages:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases


float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

To contest deletions that have have already been discussed (in particular, at Articles for deletion), or that are likely to be controversial, please make a request at Misplaced Pages:Deletion review instead.
Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Federico Valverde

He played for Peñarol and Uruguay Under 15,Uruguay Under 17 (see here) and Uruguay Under 18 -Abiii13wp (talk) 15:36, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

  • Tokyogirl79 Thanks!
WP:NFOOTY: Players who have played in, and managers who have managed in any Tier 1 International Match, as defined by FIFA, (including the Olympics) are notable. The notability of these is accepted as they would have received significant coverage as outlined above in the general notability criteria.

And he played in 2015 South American Under-17 Football Championship. He has 55 International Match. --Abiii13wp (talk) 10:59, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

I'm Coming Out vinyl singles

These images were used in I'm Coming Out article. I removed them intentionally to use the image of the US single for the American song. Somehow, someone else tried to replace it with another image. I reinserted the US single without removing the other. Now I am requesting undeletion of these above images. Soon, I'm setting up the RFC to invite people to pick which image we must keep. I decide to temporarily keep all four images until there is a consensus to keep either one. -George Ho (talk) 03:08, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Mercator Medical S.A.

Article was deleted because I missed the time to defend it. I have contacted with Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus (he initiated the PROD procedure) to prove notability of the deleted article. Piotrus told that with my arguments article should be doable, he recommended to ask for recreation of the article in my sandbox for expanding. That's why I kindly ask to revive "my precious" :-) -Wubes123 (talk) 08:26, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Mashar T Hamsa

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Manu.phoenixoperands (talk) 09:28, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

The all things which described are true...This article will be for some producers in the malayalam movie to contact a costume designer

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. We are not a substitute for an advert or normal industry channels, and in any case A7 speedy deletions aren't overturned here. —Jeremy v^_^v 10:18, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Recreation of Mashar Hamsa, deleted per Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Mashar Hamsa, since recreated twice and salted under that title. Current version is up for speedy deletion per G4 as well as A7. --Finngall 13:22, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
@Tokyogirl79: Reddogsix beat you to it. --Finngall

Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Chris Gorell Barnes

I, Aliceshawbeckett, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Aliceshawbeckett (talk) 16:33, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:26, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Westminster Presbyterian Church, Buffalo, New York

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Lenore Neiler (talk) 18:12, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Lenore Neiler (talk) 18:12, 24 July 2015 (UTC) I am the Communications Coordinator at Westminster Presbyterian Church Buffalo New York. I have access and permission to draw content from our website

@Lenore Neiler: Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else; try contacting the deleting administrator (Neutrality (talk · contribs)) in order to be emailed a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion. Misplaced Pages is the one hosting the the content, so it is the one that needs the permission. Please see WP:Donating copyrighted materials for more information. Do note that in the vast majority of cases, donated text is still unable to be used verbatim due to its tone (see WP:Neutral point of view, which is not negotiable). —Jeremy v^_^v 19:43, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Oleg Yefimov

I, O7oleg, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. O7oleg (talk) 18:32, 24 July 2015 (UTC) ,

@O7oleg: Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. A G13 can be neutralised merely by editing the page. I suggest reading WP:Conflict of interest, though. —Jeremy v^_^v 19:44, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/John-Paul Kalire

I, Jaypworks, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jaypworks (talk) 20:01, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. At the moment this person seems to have no claim of importance, and no evidence of notability either. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:05, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

John-Paul Kalire

No feedback and un-answered or unedited fields -Jaypworks (talk) 20:05, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Not done Article not created, therefore nothing to restore.Blethering Scot 21:23, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Probably referring to Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/John-Paul Kalire. --Finngall 21:35, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Achraf Baznani

Hello, I think the artist is famous in the arab world, he exhibited in Louvre Musuem in Paris: Les œuvres photographiques du Marocain Achraf Baznani au Louvre -41.140.32.211 (talk) 20:39, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Previously deleted several times and salted under the above title, also created as Achraf Baznani (photographer) and deleted per an extensive discussion at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Achraf Baznani (photographer). --Finngall 20:57, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Mureşul Târgu Mureş

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Alexiulian25 (talk) 22:04, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Copa del Rey Topscorers by Season

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Alexiulian25 (talk) 22:05, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Copa del Rey Topscorers

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Alexiulian25 (talk) 22:06, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

CSM Suceava

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Alexiulian25 (talk) 22:07, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/Functional_Objects

Influential company, donated a significant body of free software, cited by other Wiki articles . One member went on to work on the Clozure project. (palter) I was researching the history of the Dylan programming language, and found this important link missing. Please restore it and guard it from deletion. Thank you. -68.102.155.24 (talk) 22:15, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Done I have restored this based on a claim of significance in the article. But there is no guard against deletion. Consensus can determine if this is kept. Find more references to ensure that notability is proven. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:22, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
(e/c) Not done Hello. That page was a blatant copyright violation, infringing on the content here. As such, it cannot be undeleted. The fact that a page was deleted in the past under a speedy deletion criterion does not set a precedent, and is very often no reflection on the subject's merit to have an article. Rather it's all about what was written. So, the fact that an article failed to set forth the importance of the topic, or was almost empty, or was written like a commercial and so was considered blatant advertising or was a copyright violation, as appears to be case here, just means if an article is warranted for the topic and could be written in a proper manner, the one that was deleted wasn't it. In short, this write-up won't be undeleted, but a new article can be started, without prejudice. I will note that I would not have deleted it under the speedy deletion criterion used, but the fact it was a copyright violation was a valid basis, even if not discovered when originally deleted.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:28, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Graeme. I have to delete based on the copyvio.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:28, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Tha Aristocrats (musical group)

I, Sn7mgmt, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sn7mgmt (talk) 23:20, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

@Sn7mgmt: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 06:14, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:1996 end-of-year rugby union internationals

I, Shiresman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Shiresman (talk) 23:33, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!"--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 06:17, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Dhombaragampatti

This is an article about a village and the Temples available in it. Also the article needs to be updated. Adding content to this article may hep someone to get knowledge about this village and its culture heritage -Dprabhakar4190 (talk) 09:16, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" You really ahve to update this with some references and content! see Draft:Dhombaragampatti. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:13, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

CSUCCESS Technologies

CSUCCESS Technologies is an information technology service provider with headquarters in Surat, India. also provide Information Technology services and Web Application Services -EntrepreneurOfIndia (talk) 11:09, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Love Your Liver Foundation

Love Your Liver Foundation is a NGO working for bringing awareness regarding organ donation in india.. I appeal the community to understand the need of organ donation in india as more than two lakh people are suffering due to liver failure and this organization aware people regarding the same.. an earnest request to publish the same in the interest of public awareness -Atozweb (talk) 14:07, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Artcle was deleted per WP:CSD#G11 as blatant advertising. Requesting account is presumably a sock article creator User:Atozwebconsultancy, now indef-blocked. --Finngall 16:56, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/Karel_Martens

I submitted this request to the author: Spellcast who deleted the page, but perhaps I need to submit here instead since I didn't hear back. Sorry for the confusion.

I believe the page on Karel Martens should not have been deleted: The reason given was "not a notable graphic designer" which is not true.

Here are a few references that show how notable he is. He teaches for Yale: He founded the Werkplaats school: He won the prestigous Noordzij Prize: His books are highly revered and collectable: He is included in a list of “one hundred of history's leading practitioners” in book “The Designer Says”: along with other notable graphic designers like Ellen Lupton, Erik Spiekermann, and Jan Tschichold who are listed on the Misplaced Pages page for Graphic Design:

Also, here is his page on French wikipedia:

which has these references:

These are just a few of the many references showing how Karel Martens is an extremely notable graphic designer. Perhaps the article needs to be improved upon, but it most certainly shouldn't be deleted. Please let me know if you need any other information.

Thanks, Cdunn1981 (talk) 00:49, 26 July 2015 (UTC) -Cdunn1981 (talk) 00:49, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

  1. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/User:Spellcast
  2. https://en.wikipedia.org/Karel_Martens
  3. http://art.yale.edu/KarelMartens
  4. https://www.typotheque.com/articles/karel_martens_graphic_designer
  5. http://www.kabk.nl/newsitemEN.php?newsid=0961&cat=04
  6. http://www.ebay.com/itm/KAREL-MARTENS-Printed-Matter-Drukwerk-DUTCH-GRAPHIC-DESIGN-RARE-Shrinkwrap-/351293795022
  7. http://www.ebay.com/itm/KAREL-MARTENS-Printed-Matter-1st-edition-WHITE-cover-1996-/221687445294
  8. http://www.amazon.com/Karel-Martens-Counterprint-Karl/dp/0907259251
  9. https://www.papress.com/html/book.details.page.tpl?isbn=9781616891343
  10. https://en.wikipedia.org/Graphic_design
  11. https://fr.wikipedia.org/Karel_Martens
  12. https://hyphenpress.co.uk/authors/karel_martens
  13. http://www.werkplaatstypografie.org/

Suvrat Raj(student)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -SUVRAT RAJ (talk) 15:50, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Northamerica1000 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:53, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

suvrat raj(student)

please don't delete this document. It is not my own autobiography. It is the famous student of siwan district -SUVRAT RAJ (talk) 15:55, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Northamerica1000 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Please do not post multiple requests to restore the same article.  Philg88  15:59, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

jobedu

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Sarakhalaf (talk) 18:34, 26 July 2015 (UTC) i am in need of this page for the purpose of improving and editing it for future needs to be share . this page has been made with a lot of effort so i kindly request it to be recovered to be improved .

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else; try contacting the deleting administrator (Jimfbleak (talk · contribs)) in order to be emailed a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion. —Jeremy v^_^v 19:07, 26 July 2015 (UTC)


i would kindly ask for the recover of this page for further reasons . as previously noticed, the page has been deleted due its performance of advertisement for a certain company . i apologize for that , it was indeed a mistake that should be corrected . i would like to either edit the page here on wiki page or either receive it from you on my email . as you can see this was a page intended to serve a huge purpose in delivering messages and information on the bedwans and how people support them and belong to them through their creations , whether it was in a business or through creativity. i would kindly politely ask for the recovery of the page or for it to be send to me on my email for future editing and revising . thank you very much

You can contact any admin to send the contents of the final revision to you via Misplaced Pages's email system, but you need to have email enabled for your account. I suggest reading WP:What Misplaced Pages is not. —Jeremy v^_^v 21:15, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 Done copy sent. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:16, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Producer James Worthy

Page was deleted due to "copyright infringement" from reverbnation. I would like to have an opportunity to change the biography although it was written by a source of James Worthy for his continued use and was written specifically for a purpose such as Misplaced Pages. At this time, I have no problem re-writing the biography for use for Misplaced Pages and would love to get the opportunity to do so! I am new at Misplaced Pages, so I have been trying to find out how to contact the administrator that deleted the page also. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by CValrie (talk • contribs)

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G12, which indicates a page copied and pasted wholesale from another source, or otherwise closely paraphrased from same. G12 deletions will not be overturned here or anywhere else. You must re-write it from scratch, as admins will not restore obvious copyright violations or send yu a copy of the deleted article (on the grounds that you still have access to the source the article was copied from). Note that "a purpose such as Misplaced Pages" is, if I assume correctly, actually disallowed as Misplaced Pages's license requires the ability to re-use the content in any context provided all requirements are met (see our content licence for more details). —Jeremy v^_^v 21:19, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • CValrie, I'd also recommend that you read over Misplaced Pages's WP:NPOV policy, as well as the conflict of interest guidelines (since it looks like you're likely someone working for him). The other issue with the article other than copyright is that the article was also fairly promotional in tone, a common issue with articles that were taken from somewhere else. It's also fairly common for people with a conflict of interest to miss promotional tones because they're closely affiliated with the subject or they're part of a marketing crew that frequently uses promotional WP:BUZZWORDS in their daily work. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:42, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

William Lawton

William Lawton is an important activist and funder for a community development program with over 150,000 families currently being helped. The page is factual, and is not advertising and should be restored -Berkeley222 (talk) 21:01, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

The page was PRODded, not speedied. PRODs are restored on request here (it's considered challenging the PROD). —Jeremy v^_^v 21:22, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Bill You (powerlifter)

I, 64.180.36.203, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 64.180.36.203 (talk) 03:54, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Ray Carr

I, 2602:306:3130:9520:6572:63F0:774F:8EE7, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2602:306:3130:9520:6572:63F0:774F:8EE7 (talk) 08:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

  • I need to note that this was previously requested for restoration here. This still has some of the same issues with tone and sourcing that I brought up last time. Can you show some sort of in-depth coverage to prove that this person is notable? If not, then I'm not really sure what restoring this would really accomplish since it's been declined so many times already. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:49, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Also, if this is restored it'd likely need to be edited to remove the puffery. There were several WP:PEACOCK phrases in there, not to mention several things that had no bearing on Carr as far as Misplaced Pages is concerned. For example, why is it important to note that one of his children is single and a rapper? That's fairly WP:INDISCRIMINATE information that makes the article seem more promotional and in so doing, makes Carr seem less likely to be notable. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:51, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

I wrote a draft for an article on Ray Carr - a local disc jockey, which was deleted in May WITHOUT NOTIFYING me in my e-mail. I have tried repeatedly to get advice on chat, and some help with rewrites, but, apparently, I never seem to get it good enough for Misplaced Pages to accept it. I'm told the man is "not notable", and I don't agree, and could add a lot more than is there now, if the page would be undeleted. I tried following the instructions on how to do this, and I don't know if it went through. Can someone PLEASE help me with this? I just want to get it DONE and PUBLISHED ALREADY. THANK YOU. Here is the code I used for my request: -CVActor1 (talk) 08:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

  • CVActor1, I'm merging this since it's the same request. My basic request here is that you show some sort of proof that things might turn out differently if we restored this again. This was declined several times by different editors and it contained a lot of promotional language. (Plus the amount of links on the article constitute WP:ELSPAM.) All I'm asking for is some sort of proof that there might be more coverage that would potentially change the outcome this time. I'm not saying no, I just want something to show that this time might be different. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:01, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • It also looks like you were notified about the page's deletion on your talk page. Normally this does send an alert to your mail, but sometimes e-mail accounts will put messages from Misplaced Pages in the junk folder and occasionally people will have outdated e-mail addresses linked to Misplaced Pages or may disable the "send e-mail alerts" function. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:07, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Basically the concern about the article's sources was that they were all local ones, which are greatly depreciated on Misplaced Pages by many members. Several of the sources were also WP:PRIMARY, meaning that they were released by Carr or someone/something affiliated with him, and some like this one aren't even about Carr himself but are about one of his sons. These will not be able to show notability since it is within the best interests of Carr and places associated with him (like the YMCA) to write about him and notability cannot be inherited (WP:NOTINHERITED) by his children gaining coverage. Being a radio DJ does not automatically give him notability either and I'll note that this is actually very difficult for most DJs to accomplish in general since there are so many out there. It's also generally accepted that local radio personalities will host local events, so just being a host for something does not guarantee notability either. The only source that looked like it could be usable to help show notability was The Sun Newspapers article, which I'm going to assume is a local paper. There is the possibility that the article from the Plains Dealer could show notability, but just the title gives off the impression that the article was about an event and that if Carr is mentioned, it's only in passing. This would make it a WP:TRIVIAL source, which cannot show notability either. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Drug2Gene

I, 46.10.208.211, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 46.10.208.211 (talk) 13:07, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:03, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Wibu-Systems AG

I, Thomricci, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Thomricci (talk) 13:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

I would like to address comments by the reviewers and resubmit the article. I didn't realize you could leave the page for more than 6 months without editing. Thomricci (talk) 13:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:02, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Amica International

Amica is an European brand of home appliances. All I added is a small piece of their history. That's nothing to do with promotion because I've seen many other companies like Beko, Electrolux, Bosch. I would like to know what was the reason to delete it?! Thank you! -JustWorking (talk) 21:12, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Not done. @JustWorking: It read as promotional content in a number of ways. It spoke to the reader in the first person "we", "our", "us" and editorialized about the product in a glowing light ("...started to be trusted..." – says who just the facts, no gloss. More importantly, it was a copyright violation of Amica's website, copying and pasting its non-free copyrighted expression. We do not undelete copyright violations. For a proper article to be attempted, it would need to cite to reliable, secondary sources that are entirely unconnected with Amica, writing about it in detail. That article should be written by someone without a conflict of interest.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Undefined/Wikipedia:Co-op/JBFan4

I made a request for undeletion and my responsible to restore the page, then I can have a page test and been good forever -JBFan4 (talk) 21:48, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Potters_house_chennai_church

The People Here in this locality have greater difficulty in finding and locating Churches, as it is newly developed area. This page will definetly serve lots of purpose in talking the information to the locals

That isn't Misplaced Pages's purpose. I have accordingly tagged The Potters House Chennai Church for speedy deletion (Criterion G11). —Jeremy v^_^v 13:16, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
This page needs to be rewritten to be an encyclopedia entry rather than an advert. You will need independent references to show notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:19, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/Feefo

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Johndesmond (talk) 07:55, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? —Jeremy v^_^v 13:13, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • I assume that the OP was asking for the AfC draft specifically, since they used the AfC preloaded form, and it's not the first time someone asking for undeletion of a draft omitted the prefixes. —Jeremy v^_^v 13:35, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

User:Gunnex

By unknown reason my user page User:Gunnex was deleted. I did NOT requested the deletion but it might be that I accidentally played with some deletion templates (and stored it unintentionally) as I am involved in deletion of copyrighted files which were originally uploaded here, later transferred to Commons and deleted there. So, please restore my user page. Thx. -Gunnex (talk) 09:08, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Done You placed a speedy delete tag yourself suggesting it was a copyright violation! Use <nowiki>{{db-F7}}</nowiki> or whatever if you want the wikitext without the action. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:11, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/GeoPackage

I, Fish154, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Fish154 (talk) 14:44, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Check my User:Fish154/sandbox for the new version.

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Are you going to paste your sandbox into the AFC page? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:32, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Jaryn Satterfield

I, Jpfthebest, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jpfthebest (talk) 16:20, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Pro Motion, Inc.

I, Zenironman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. More articles to show notability are available -Zenironman (talk) 16:33, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:35, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Public Law Outline

Please un-delete Draft:Public Law Outline S.tollyfield (talk) 18:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:37, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Vivienne Harvey

I, Jamesjefferies, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jamesjefferies (talk) 10:17, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:43, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Drug2Gene

The article was deleted under the G13 (Abandoned Articles for creation submissions) general criterion for speedy deletion. The submission was previously declined on 20 March 2014 because of lack of independent reliable sources verifying the provided information and fail in proving notability. Circumstances have changed, four independent citations have become available since then. I would like to retrieve the draft in order to edit the page content with respect to the commented issues, and re-submit it -Latimeria bg (talk) 12:52, 29 July 2015 (UTC)}}

Proposed article has already been restored as per request above. --Finngall 14:05, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

World Cheerleading Championships

It's very important for young cheerleaders to explore the history of our World Championships. The USASF does not have a page dedicated to world champions past the year 2009, and this page had every single top 3 team from the beginning (2004), to the most recent (2015). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.78.126.240 (talk • contribs)

Article by this name was speedily deleted per author's request last week. No old AfC candidates found under this title--closest I could find is Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Cheerleading World Championship, which is decidedly not ready for mainspace. --Finngall 21:07, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
See also Talk:U.S. All Star Federation#World Cheerleading Championships. In short, the history still contains all of the content. It was forked to the above-linked, G7'ed page, and the content was thereupon removed from U.S. All Star Federation. However, the person who forked it apparently found that much of it was unverifiable and chock full of errors where verification was even possible, so the forked content article was deleted, and it was also not revived in the original article. Please note the requirements of WP:BURDEN. If this is to be returned to the article, having been challenged, it will require citations to reliable sources through inline citations that verify the information.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:46, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Probably a good idea to ping the forker.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:50, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Fuhghettaboutit is pretty much dead-on; with almost no reliable verification of the information found on the page (even the information from 2015) I figured it would be best to nuke it and start from scratch. I didn't realise there was a draft page already started (even though it's rather nonexistent), so it would be a good idea to work on that page and do it properly. Primefac (talk) 07:16, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Disc Makers

I, Ender9, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ender9 (talk) 20:45, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Recently G13 deleted as Draft:Disc Makers. --Finngall 20:55, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Misplaced Pages are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v 21:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:08, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Zeeshan haider

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Shani302 (talk) 20:51, 29 July 2015 (UTC) Zeeshan haider

Article had been speedily deleted per WP:CSD#A7. --Finngall 20:57, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Please restore my wikipedia page i really need that i'm a singer thanks "Save page" button below -Shani302 (talk) 21:11, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

 Not done. @Shani302: No. Misplaced Pages is not here for your publicity purposes. You don't "need" a page here. We have a strict policy on this, see WP:NOTPROMOTION. Also see Misplaced Pages:Autobiographies -- you should not be writing articles about yourself. If you're a singer, you need to meet one of the criteria in WP:MUSICBIO before an article about you will be accepted. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:28, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Sunshine Coast Football

Was the process for removing articles that the subject of the article wishes Misplaced Pages to remove followed in this case? -Ottawahitech (talk) 09:04, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

On a related note, is "I don't want this here" a valid PROD reason? Primefac (talk) 09:19, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Any PROD reason is valid if the PROD remains for 7+ days. —Jeremy v^_^v 16:48, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
That's correct. And any request to restore an article deleted by PROD is also valid, under most circumstances. @Primefac: or @Ottawahitech: are you requesting restoration, or just asking a question? ~Amatulić (talk) 20:12, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Amatulic, if the answer to my question had been "no" then I would be requesting a refund. However, if it's valid then I'm not particularly bothered. Primefac (talk) 20:14, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
@Primefac: To clarify, WP:IDONTLIKEIT (which is basically what this was), isn't a valid reason to delete any article, prod or otherwise. Bear in mind that an administrator isn't obligated to delete an article that's had a prod on it for 7 days. If this article had been well-sourced with evidence of notability, I would decline to delete it if the only reason given was "the subject doesn't want this article here".
However, in this case, the article had no references to coverage in independent reliable sources. It also didn't have any claim of significance, which might have qualified it for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#A7. Even if it had a claim of significance, I doubt it would have survived AFD. Therefore, I would have deleted this article if I had found it prodded for 7+ days, even if the reason given in this case was bogus. There would be more valid reasons to put in the prod tag. Likely, the deleting administrator reached the same conclusion.
Because it was deleted by PROD, I am happy to restore it, or move it to your user space for you to examine and improve, if you want. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:52, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Ah, so it was a bit more of an WP:IAR than a proper PROD. Keeping it deleted is fine, I have too many not-notable articles to fix already. Thanks for the offer, though. Primefac (talk) 20:53, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Please restore, and let someone take it to wp:AFD if they are so inclined. I do not do any work in anything sports related, but I happened to notice this wp:PROD and did not get a chance to save it before was deleted. It was contributed to by several (many?) editors over some years, and IIRC belonged to a couple of WikiProjects. The nominator did not notify the article creator of the nomination. There seem to be a very large number of other articles which linked to it:https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:WhatLinksHere/Sunshine_Coast_Football. Ottawahitech (talk) 12:57, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

User:Kimlou813/Frugal Fashionista Clothing Swap™

I, Kimlou813, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kimlou813 (talk) 13:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

The information that was deleted is 100% true. I didn't even know it was deleted until I came back this morning to make some additions. My info can be verified here:

  • www.frugalfashionistaclothingswap.org
  • and a news cast from Voice of America here: www.voanews.com/media/video/1652262.html
  • www.washingtonpost.com/local/clothing-swaps-the-new-antidote-to-a-down-e...
  • www.washingtonian.com/blogs/shoparound/shopping/fashion-agenda-book-hill...
  • www.washingtonian.com/events/2013/04/08/frugal-fashionista-plus-size-clo...
  • www.washingtonian.com/articles/best-of-washington/best-of-washington-201...
  • a magisto movie I made this afternoon: www.magisto.com/video/MVEGIVUGHDI2ThZiCzE
@Kimlou813: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
I'll add the the article appears now to exist for publicity purposes, and as such it would not be acceptable. Good luck in bringing it up to acceptable standards. Please see Misplaced Pages:Golden rule for brief guidance on what we expect. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:16, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

ines Temple

I would like to edit the page with citing references to see if I can re-submit and get it accepted -Swissmit (talk) 16:12, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

@Swissmit:  Done. No article by that title has ever existed on Misplaced Pages. However, restored User:Swissmit/sandbox, which you had asked to be deleted previously. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:34, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Daphne Lee Martin

I added a notable musician page, with a biographical history, including awards and reviews and no advertising at all, along with many references. Why is this being considered advertising? Many many bands have similar pages. Is there something I can do to make it better? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DameCalico (talk • contribs) 18:48, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else; try contacting the deleting administrator (NawlinWiki (talk · contribs)) in order to be emailed a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion. It got deleted because the article itself reads like an advert and would need to be completely rewritten to remove the promotional tone. Sources have no bearing on a G11; tone is everything. —Jeremy v^_^v 20:30, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Not done and will not be done. The article was written in a tone so promotional that it would need to be rewritten from scratch. From the lead paragraph that goes "Forever blending genres in the legacy of the great Tin Pan Alley songwriters, Daphne takes beloved traditional southern roots sounds and.... As always, the lyrics are fermented and distilled in a bathtub full of misfit Interbellum prose" — and it doesn't get any better. No way will promotional text like that be restored. Misplaced Pages is not a publicity platform.
You are free to try again, preferably going through Misplaced Pages:Articles for creation because it is clear you have a conflict of interest on this topic. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:37, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
  • I was quite surprised by what struck me as a tone of non-cooperation here. I went to refresh my memory as to the wording of WP:CSD#G11, and Misplaced Pages:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox_or_means_of_promotion. I don't see either wikidocument saying "As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else".

    I then used our internal search engine, to search the entire wikipedia for this specific phrase @Jéské Couriano: used. It turned up 21 instances. The first was a template under Jéské Couriano's main user page. The other 20 instances are all places where User:Jéské Couriano used this template: 173, 174, 175,176, 178, 180, 181, 183,184, 185, 186, 187, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 197.

    Do either WP:CSD#G11 or Misplaced Pages:NOTFORPROMOTION require a complete rewrite from scratch? G11 says it should be applied to articles that require a "fundamental rewrite".

    Who says "fundamental rewrite" is synonymous with a "complete rewrite from scratch"?

    My understanding of the administrator's mandate is that administrator's actions are not, generally, supposed to be punitive, rather, they are supposed to be educational. Aren't even blocks supposed to be educational, a way of getting the attention of contributors who have ignored warnings that they have been making serious lapses from policy?

    It seems to me that forcing someone to rewrite an article, from scratch, is punitive. They have to go and find references, all over again. @DameCalico: seems to be a newbie, and I think the responses here are lapses from WP:BITE. A newbie has to figure out, all over again,the templates we use for references, and how we format lists and tables. Unnecessarily making them learn all that, a second time, is deeply punitive.

    In my opinion, there is no notable topic that can't be written from a neutral point of view.

    I don't know User:DameCalico, User:Jéské Couriano or User:Amatulic, and I had never heard of Daphne Lee Martin. But I just googled her, and, if DameCalico is correct, and the deleted article did contain sufficient valid reference, I'll bet that the neutralizing bias-ectomy that a successful G11 requires is actually trivial.

    I request userification, so I can test to see whether the neutralizing bias-ectomy is as trivial as I suspect. Geo Swan (talk) 13:34, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

User:Animall/Cardio First Angel

I, Bluerasberry, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Blue Rasberry (talk) 00:29, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:15, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Kate Petley

Not finished editing page. Idiot comments to prior edits. -Mnelsonp (talk) 01:52, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Insulting other users doesn't help your case at all. —Jeremy v^_^v 02:16, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:14, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/Genealogy_for_women

This page is about a gender equality project started from the way certain services are provided and involving the industry. It is not advertising. No link to companies, products or services is provided. The article does not use commercial language. There is no reason for deletion -- unless the administrador did not understood the issue or does not like the theme. -Jacintobettencourt (talk) 07:32, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Panther Games

I, Volrath2002, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Volrath2002 (talk) 09:53, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:28, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Muktar Yahya Najee al-Warafi

Muktar Yahya Najee al-Warafi is in the news again. I am requesting userification. Al Warafi's lawyers have submitted multiple habeas petitions, that have triggered extensive third party commentary. In 2011 his lawyers pointed out that he had been serving the Taliban as a medic, and, as such, he should have never been classified as an "enemy combatant", since, as a noncombatant medic, he was not a combatant, by definition. (This claim was ultimately rejected because he couldn't prove he had been a fulltime medic.) In 2015, after a January 2015 announcement by President Obama that the USA's combat operations in Afghanistan were overed, his lawyers argued that the Geneva Conventions only authorized captor nations to detain individuals for the duration of hostilities. Geo Swan (talk) 10:53, 31 July 2015 (UTC) -Geo Swan (talk) 10:53, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Hrvoje Spajić

I, Champollion, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Champollion (talk) 11:04, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

East wind condos

real building in ponce inlet, Florida. -TristanAlessi612 (talk) 11:30, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Speedily deleted four times thus far, most notably per WP:CSD#A11 (obviously invented). --Finngall 13:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Categories: