Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 15:28, 8 August 2015

Koala15, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Koala15! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Please join other people who edit Misplaced Pages at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Misplaced Pages where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:05, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Misplaced Pages, Koala15. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Misplaced Pages:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Misplaced Pages:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 15:00, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Koala15, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dan56 (talk) 23:45, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Hey Koala15! I'm awarding you this Barnstar for your works in articles mostly related to animation and others. Thank you and have a nice day! :) Mediran (t • c) 09:32, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Czarface, Koala15!

Misplaced Pages editor Pjposullivan just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Terrific article, a pleasure to read. Many thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Pjposullivan's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Some baklava for you!

Thanks for your contributions to bring Monsters, Inc. up to GA status! -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:55, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Incredibles

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article The Incredibles you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- TonyTheTiger (talk) 11:56, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Incredibles

The article The Incredibles you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Incredibles for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- TonyTheTiger (talk) 00:07, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Congrats! One of my favorites. -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:17, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Jackass Presents: Bad Grandpa

On 4 September 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jackass Presents: Bad Grandpa, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the makeup for Johnny Knoxville's character in Jackass Presents: Bad Grandpa took three hours to apply? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jackass Presents: Bad Grandpa. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ratatouille (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ratatouille (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanimum -- Zanimum (talk) 00:50, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ratatouille (film)

The article Ratatouille (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ratatouille (film) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanimum -- Zanimum (talk) 00:32, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Half Million Award

		The Half Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Ratatouille (film) (estimated annual readership: 632,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Half Million Award. Congratulations, and thanks for all you do for Misplaced Pages's readers! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:37, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

You're also welcome to display this userbox:

This editor won the Half Million Award for bringing Ratatouille to Good Article status.

Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:37, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A Bug's Life

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A Bug's Life you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jionpedia -- Jionpedia (talk) 12:30, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A Bug's Life

The article A Bug's Life you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:A Bug's Life for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jionpedia -- Jionpedia (talk) 12:42, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Toy Story 2

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Toy Story 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mediran -- Mediran (talk) 11:31, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for The Marshall Mathers LP 2

On 10 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Marshall Mathers LP 2, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that "Berzerk", produced by Rick Rubin, and "Survival", which appears in Call of Duty: Ghosts, are both songs from Eminem's eighth studio album, The Marshall Mathers LP 2? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Marshall Mathers LP 2. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady (talk) 01:03, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Berzerk (song)

On 10 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Berzerk (song), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that "Berzerk", produced by Rick Rubin, and "Survival", which appears in Call of Duty: Ghosts, are both songs from Eminem's eighth studio album, The Marshall Mathers LP 2? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady (talk) 01:07, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	For making Toy Story 2 a GA. Keep it up! ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 11:53, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Finding Nemo

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Finding Nemo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jionpedia -- Jionpedia (talk) 19:00, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Finding Nemo

The article Finding Nemo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Finding Nemo for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jionpedia -- Jionpedia (talk) 14:22, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shrek

The article Shrek you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Shrek for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 18:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cars (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cars (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 3 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Rcsprinter (Gimme a message) @ 18:02, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

It has now passed. Rcsprinter (indicate) @ 23:20, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Half Million Award

		The Half Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Cars (film) (estimated annual readership: 964,012) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Half Million Award. Congratulations, and thanks for all you do for Misplaced Pages's readers! -- Bobnorwal (talk) 15:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Go get 'em, tiger! :D Bobnorwal (talk) 15:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pinocchio (1940 film)

The article Pinocchio (1940 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pinocchio (1940 film) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Loeba -- Loeba (talk) 20:02, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi Koala - I was happy to do this GAN but wanted to mention that it's a wee bit disheartening not to get a word of thanks (reviewing does take time and effort). I'm sure you didn't mean to be rude but I wanted to give you a head's up for the future - it's always good to thank your reviewer. That's all, no hard feelings. Keep up the good editing --Loeba (talk) 08:04, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Good Article Barnstar
	For making Disney's Pinocchio a GA! Kailash29792 (talk) 04:11, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Fantasia

Well done for the quick work on another film GA. You will be happy to know that this article swiftly passed the review. I knew from the start this one would easily pass! ☠ Jaguar ☠ 19:17, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for all the help. Koala15 (talk) 20:57, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fantasia (film)

The article Fantasia (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fantasia (film) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 21:31, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Disney Barnstar
	This is for making Fantasia (1940) a GA! And also because you made a GA out of three consecutive Disney articles (Cars, Pinocchio and this). I wish you all the best for making more GA's out of Disney articles. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:45, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! Koala15 (talk) 05:37, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Jungle Book (1967 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Jungle Book (1967 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:40, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

I have finished the review and put it on hold for seven days. It's a good article - only a few minor points need to addressing. Let me know when you're done with them. ☠ Jaguar ☠ 18:52, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For making Disney's Jungle Book a GA! Kailash29792 (talk) 15:26, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Corpse Bride

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Corpse Bride you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:30, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Corpse Bride

The article Corpse Bride you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Corpse Bride for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:01, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Quarter Million Award

		The Quarter Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Corpse Bride (estimated annual readership: 276,997) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Quarter Million Award. Congratulations, and thanks for all you do for Misplaced Pages's readers. –Prototime (talk · contribs) 03:23, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Misplaced Pages's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Misplaced Pages:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

This editor won the Million Award for bringing Corpse Bride to Good Article status.

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! And again, congratulations! –Prototime (talk · contribs) 03:23, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for The Jungle Book (1967 film)

On 17 March 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Jungle Book (1967 film), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Walt Disney died during the production of his last film, The Jungle Book? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Jungle Book (1967 film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Disney and Pixar articles

Your work in this area is unparalleled, and as a lover of these grand animated films, I can't thank you enough for your tireless efforts to bring them up to scratch. Just thought I'd let you feast your eyes on some stats I've put together on the article quality of some of the categories. Its fascinating to see how low many of the articles are (or at least were, when I first created these stat articles in 2012 - before your improvements). Nevertheless there is much work to be done.

• Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Disney/to do/Disney films
• Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Disney/to do/Disneytoon films
• Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Disney/to do/Pixar films
• Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Disney/to do/Pixar short films

I was also wondering if, due to your expertise, you could look over some of the work I've been doing in the realm of animated films and perhaps build upon them through copyediting, research, or other helpful advice to make the articles even better?--Coin945 (talk) 05:51, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks ill check them out. Koala15 (talk) 14:16, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Cheers. Though I'm the first to admit that I'm not the greatest Misplaced Pages editor, I have a massive passion for this topic so have tried to improve the articles with great effort. I sincerely hope you and I can make some of these articles really good. :)--Coin945 (talk) 16:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Beauty and the Beast (1991 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Beauty and the Beast (1991 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Prashant! -- Prashant! (talk) 01:40, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Peanuts (film)

On 31 March 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Peanuts (film), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the scheduled release of the Peanuts movie in 2015 would "commemorate the 65th anniversary of the comic strip and the 50th anniversary of the TV special A Charlie Brown Christmas"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Peanuts (film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For making Disney's Beauty and the Beast a GA! Kailash29792 (talk) 04:32, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Good Article Barnstar

	Good Article Barnstar
	For Disney's The Little Mermaid. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	North Korean Fashion Watch Barnstar
	Gerald Shields, founder of the North Korean Fashion Watch, awards you the North Korean Fashion Watch Barnstar for your continuing efforts to add reliable and poignant discussions about North Korean topics, such as the 2014 comedy movie The Interview. Geraldshields11 (talk) 14:10, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

A pie for you!

Thanks for your contribution on VII – Teyana Taylor album. Karlhard (talk) 15:10, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Hey, thanks for going through all the Children's BAFTA additions I made and fixing the citations! Luthien22 (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

IPadPerson (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Happy New Year Koala15!

Koala15,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:04, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Hey! I know I'm a year late, but I just wanted to say nice job @ Finding Nemo! Bananasoldier (talk) 06:09, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Dark Horse

Hey Koala15, Shallowharold here. I accidentally removed Berner's name from the featured artists section of Twista's album Dark Horse. The reason for the accident was due to me patrolling Twista's album pages and trying to ward off a vandal who thought it would be funny to put Shia Labeouf's name in the credits of each and every Twista album. While I succeeded in removing Labeouf's name, I accidentally removed Berner's name in the process. My sincerest apologies- I had no intention on doing that. Shallowharold (talk) 11:01, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Gentle Giant (film)

Hi Koala15, I wanted to let you know that I undid your edit to Gentle Giant (film) because it appeared you deleted a large amount of text for being unsourced. I understand this, however I did have sources for that material bookmarked or saved and just had not yet added them to the article. I have just added about 15 new inline sources to the article supporting all the text that I replaced, so I trust that resolves the issue. Feel free to contact me if you have any other questions. Thanks, TheBlinkster (talk) 03:54, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

The article looks great. Very nice! Koala15 (talk) 04:30, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. Your motivation was clearly what was needed to get that finished up finally. TheBlinkster (talk) 04:33, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Template:Infobox television

I'm not sure whether you're unaware of the |last_aired= instructions at Template:Infobox television, that would surprise me considering how much you contribute, but both of your edits here and here are inconsistent with the instructions. Saying, "The rest of the episodes will most likely air at some point." is the epitome of speculation and contravenes WP:CRYSTAL. For all you know, those eps will go straight to DVD or Netflix or some other streaming medium, or may not air at all. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:10, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Well the last new episode aired last June right? I don't think enough time has passed to say the series has ended without a source that says so. Their are about 9 episodes or more in post-production. Who knows maybe they are waiting to premiere them around the time when Kung Fu Panda 3 comes out. Koala15 (talk) 19:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

I can tell you haven't read the parameter instructions because you keep bringing up "ended", when nobody has said the series has "ended". The instructions say: "In some cases the fate of a program might be uncertain, for example if there are no announcements that a show has been renewed. If such a program has not aired a new episode in 12 months, "present" can be changed to the date the last episode aired, using {{end date}}. This does not imply the series has been cancelled, rather that the program "last aired" on that date. This is to prevent programs from being listed as "present" in perpetuity." If you intend to have a productive interaction with other editors, you may need to do some reading. Nobody has said that the series has ended, only that it literallly "last aired" June 22, 2014, which is over 12 months ago. Also, was this edit performed by you or someone you know? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:02, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

No i hadn't read infobox television until today. Is it new? From my time on here i don't remember the "last aired" parameter being interpreted this way. Its usually strictly used when the series has ended. And no i don't know who made that edit. Koala15 (talk) 02:29, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

There was a discussion in July 2014, and the change was made in August 2014 after a sufficient waiting period that yielded no objections. Since you probably won't read the discussion to get the background, the summary is that it became ridiculous to indicate a series as "present" if it hadn't aired a new episode in 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, and so on. This was mostly problematic for children's television articles, since Nick and Disney and CN rarely say "we've dumped this show". In network television the trades say straight-up "this show is cancelled". In Kids' TV the best you typically get is the absence of the show in the next season's pickup, which leaves a perpetual mystery: Was the series dropped? Did they make a mistake? Maybe it'll come back? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:02, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Oh ok, i get it. Koala15 (talk) 15:05, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Masterminds (2015 film) poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Masterminds (2015 film) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:19, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Ratchet & Clank

As I said, see WP:FILMYEAR:

"Always go by the films' earliest release date, whether it be at a film festival, a world premiere, a public release, or the release in the country or countries that produced the film, excluding sneak previews or screenings."

The source, however, states the following about the film:

"The feature, which has already been sold in more than 25 territories by Cinema Management Group (CMG), will be screening for international distributors in Cannes."

The version screened at Cannes was a still-in-progress version screened for the distributors, not its official premiere. Unless something changes and it has a proper premiere before the year ends, it's a 2016 release and should be denoted as such.

Also, please stop removing Gramercy Pictures from the page; they are distributing Ratchet & Clank under the Gramercy label. -- 136.181.195.25 (talk) 15:48, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Awards yep

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Template:Experienced_Editor Iamiyouareyou (talk) 14:01, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

No

Ok, I'm getting really bored of this whole "you're a newcomer" "you don't know what these guidelines mean!!!" shit, it's really not the case. The article had absolutely no sources, and failed two fundamental notability guidelines, one specific to content, the other to music related content, so it was perfectly fine to redirect. If you want to add all the sources so it passes, be my guest, but please enlighten me on how I don't understand these guidelines o-wiki-god? Azealia911 _talk 17:46, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Well if you did fully understand the guidelines, you would know that you shouldn't revert an article just because its unsourced. Unless its blatantly fake. Koala15 (talk) 18:16, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Where does it say that in either guideline? Azealia911 _talk 18:18, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Also, are you actually going to work on the album article any more? Because at this point, it still fails WP:NALBUMS. Azealia911 _talk 19:58, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Once again you show that you don't understand the guidelines. The album has already received enough coverage to pass WP:NALBUMS and it only came out last night. Koala15 (talk) 20:01, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Please enlighten me to which point of NALBUMS it passes. Azealia911 _talk 20:03, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

"Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble who created it." But WP:NALBUMS isn't the end all be all for everything anyway. Koala15 (talk) 21:09, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 4 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the List of Family Guy episodes page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 01:06, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

Your addition to Nellyville (TV series) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Misplaced Pages without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Misplaced Pages. For legal reasons, Misplaced Pages cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Episode summaries copied word-for-word from elsewhere, such as DirecTV listings or similar site. These must be in your own words. Logical Fuzz (talk) 21:13, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

My apologies, i meant to put them in quotations. Koala15 (talk) 21:15, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Civility

This edit summary was unnecessary and you know better. The other editor has been templated for edit warring, but your summary was needlessly provocative. General Ization 00:06, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Just a joke, and a tame one at that. Have a sense of humor. Koala15 (talk) 00:26, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

The other editor was obviously not amused, nor would I have expected them to be. You may want to think about the lack of cues to indicate humor in the edit summary field, and that humor is often unappreciated when you are simultaneously and persistently reverting another editor, whether or not it was warranted (I think it was too trivial an edit for either of you to EW over). General Ization 00:34, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

The edit was completely ridiculous, i was just referencing that. I have had much worse said to me on here. It was hardly an edit war either way. Koala15 (talk) 00:38, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Three reverts in less than twenty-four hours, over a trivial edit that would never be considered vandalism, plus a summary that was uncivil in effect if not intent; I think it would be seen differently at WP:ANEW. Let's not find out, shall we? General Ization 00:43, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

There is really no need for you to get so worked up over this. I think the matter has been resolved. I explained to the other editor what was wrong with his edit. Koala15 (talk) 00:48, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited $1,000 a Touchdown, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chandler House and Charles Bradshaw (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Reversions...

Koala15, you removed a tag by reversion with a derisory editsummary "umm yeah, no". Please, do not remove tags while the corresponding issue is unresolved.

If you don't understand why having 20 quotes in a row--all presented in the same way--is a problem, say so. I'll be happy to explain.

When another editor goes to the trouble of explaining on the Talk page why they applied a tag, it's inconsiderate to remove it through blanket reverts without explanation. I'll go replace it now. 146.198.28.207 (talk) 23:33, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

I actually wrote that section, and i don't see a problem with it. Definitely not worth a tag. Koala15 (talk) 23:37, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Koala15, if you wrote the section, all the more reason why you should not revert a tag concerning a criticism of it, since you are apparently less than impartial about your contributions to the article, and possibly less able to "see a problem with it". Whether you agree with the tag or not, please leave it in place long enough to give other editors time to consider the suggestion and potentially improve the article. If there are none to be made in a reasonable time, the tag will be removed. General Ization 01:27, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Do you see anything wrong with the section? It looks fine to me, its pretty much how reception sections are written on thousands of film pages. This IP just thinks the prose is repetitive for some reason. Any suggestions on what you would change? Koala15 (talk) 01:53, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I agree with the IP's assessment, and even if I didn't, neither you nor I are the sole judge of whether or not the section and/or other parts of the article could use improvement as suggested. And note: An editor reverts a change simply because the editor finds it "unnecessary" without claiming that the change is detrimental. This has the effect of assigning priority, between two equivalent versions, to an owner's version. Feel free to engage the IP in the discussion on the Talk page, but stop edit warring over the template. General Ization 02:03, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

So you are so quick to defend a random IP, but yet you have no ideas on whats wrong with the section and how you would improve it? This tag could stay on the article for five years and no one would do anything. And by no means am i acting like i own the article, its just a simple disagreement. And i've also had enough of you threatening to report me. Koala15 (talk) 02:10, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

I didn't say I had no ideas, I said I agreed with the criticism. I'm not taking that article on as a project, nor should I need to in order to ask you to stop edit warring over it. And there is a difference between warning and threatening, though the difference could become moot very soon. General Ization 02:14, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

By the way, what exactly is a "random IP", and why exactly do you think an IP's suggestion is by definition any less valid than one from a registered user? General Ization 02:17, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

I'm don't get why people people like you always have to constantly threaten to report editors. I get it you listen to the rules, but no one ever said the rules were the end all be all for everything. I guess it makes you feel special that you follow the rules so closely or something. And i do think an IP's suggestion is less valid, cause the majority of them are vandals. Koala15 (talk) 02:24, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Visit (2015 film) poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The Visit (2015 film) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Terminator Genisys soundtrack

Okay, but I added some little details which I hope is okay to you, and if possible, if you can copy edit it.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 17:50, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

Hello, I'm Callmemirela. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Road Chip without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 05:03, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Penguins of Madagascar. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
ANOTHER user added the template. It is NOT your call to determine if it has been resolved. Let the users who agree with the template determine if it looks better. Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 21:40, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. EauZenCashHaveIt (I'm All Ears) 20:40, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 12 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the List of Bob's Burgers episodes page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

BIG Krit

Hi! May I ask why the see also section was removed? He is an African-American person from Mississippi and I think the ethnicity article should be linked to WhisperToMe (talk) 07:56, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

To me it just seemed odd to put that in a "see also" section. Koala15 (talk) 14:57, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

I see, I sometimes find it difficult to integrate such things into the article text, since the name of the hometown also has to be mentioned, and it sometimes feels forced. WhisperToMe (talk) 00:27, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Two-Fisted (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Francis Martin

You Can't Ration Love (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Johnny Johnston

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at 2015 in hip hop music. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. -AsceticRosé 16:14, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lil Wayne The Carter V.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lil Wayne The Carter V.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Why did you change my edit on "Jack and Triumph"? Adult Swim confirmed it and it IS NOT VANDALISM! Please don't do it again. --Roverzero1983 (talk) 23:42, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Here's your proof that What i said about Jack and Triumph is true. https://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_programs_broadcast_by_Adult_Swim#Current — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roverzero1983 (talk • contribs) 00:00, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

You can't use Misplaced Pages as a source. The first season ended and the second season is next. So your statement inaccurate. Koala15 (talk) 00:05, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Too Much Too Soon (album)

Hi Koala15 ! Would you be interested in reviewing or commenting on my newly opened FAC for the article Too Much Too Soon (album)? If not, please feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 03:53, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Changing a page

WHY DID YOU KEEP CHANGING THE PAGE!!!!!😣 listen to me and STOP CHANGING IT 😡

1.Jerry Weintraub passed away at July 9th 2015

2. Warner Bros. Pictures do not expect to Village Roadshow Pictures to return to work with them for The Lego Movie 2

3. Legendary Pictures is now owned by Universal Pictures after 2014

4. They're gonna make a Adventure Time movie, a Five Nights at Freddy's movie and a Ready Player One movie so PLZ Stop changing it 😮 Quintonshark8713 (talk) 20:23, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Can you stop adding movies without release dates? Legendary is still producing Godzilla 2 regardless of the Universal deal. And Tarzan was shot last year so Weintraub already did his job before he died. Koala15 (talk) 21:19, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Impastor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christopher Vane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

¡Mayday! discography

Please do not remove the split tag from ¡Mayday! discography until discussion is complete. If you would like to comment, please do so on the talk page. Thanks! --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:55, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

If it was really long enough for its own page you would have already moved it. No need for a discussion. Koala15 (talk) 18:13, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Reply - I like to leave split discussions up for at least one month before splitting the article. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:24, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Fair enough. Koala15 (talk) 18:36, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spy Ship (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Dyer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Removal of template

Koala15, please explain what your rationale was for removing this maintenance template. As I see it, the IP posted the template with good reason, since a movie announced in January 2014 and slated for a January 2016 release would be in or have completed production by now, so more information should be available. You do not appear to have made any effort to find and add it, nor to have contacted the IP; you simply removed the template. Is this the same behavior we have been discussing here? General Ization 03:26, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Oh yeah, i should have left a edit summary. But the source that's in the sequel section is the only thing that has been announced about the film. You can look it up for yourself. Koala15 (talk) 04:44, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

That isn't what I asked. I asked why you removed the template. General Ization 04:50, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Because nothing has been announced beyond what is in the article, so an update template isn't needed. You can add it back if you feel its necessary. Koala15 (talk) 04:54, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Once again, it is not exclusively up to you what is and is not needed. If you can address a concern expressed by another editor in the form of maintenance template, please do. If you can't, I suggest you leave the template alone. In this case, the template serves the useful purpose of encouraging other editors to be on the lookout for updated information, and to add it promptly to the article when it becomes available. Also, it's just possible that another editor will know of or be able to find content on the Web that you have missed. You should not assume that because you haven't found it, it doesn't exist. General Ization 05:00, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Oh OK, i get what you're saying. Koala15 (talk) 05:19, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Warner Bros.

Hello. You need to prove your statement that Regency owns the distribution rights to what seems like select films from their WB co-productions. Your statements are unproven, and just because a film doesn't have a release date doesn't mean it should be removed from the page. If you would've had a CITATION, then content would NOT be removed. Read the rules. Thank you. StephenCezar15 (talk) 14:44, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Film's that don't have release date's shouldn't be added, cause we have no idea if they'll ever materialize beyond that. Koala15 (talk) 15:07, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Does it say that in the rules? No. I'll say this once again. Read it. StephenCezar15 (talk) 18:29, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @StephenCezar15: Since I'm not a party to the dispute, this may or may not be helpful. But see WP:NFF, WP:FFILM (essay) and WP:CRYSTAL. The former states: "films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines." (Notability, of course, includes the requirement that extensive coverage in reliable sources exists.) By implication, if they should not have their own articles, they should not be included in lists. I believe these are the policies that Koala15 is referring to, and it is up to you to explain how or why they may not apply to the current situation. General Ization 18:40, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello. Five Nights at Freddy's has already found a director. So has Ready Player One. If that information doesn't help, then that's fine. StephenCezar15 (talk) 18:43, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ambush (1939 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Robert Ray

Persons in Hiding (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Hartley

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

CCI Notice

Hello, Koala15. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Misplaced Pages in relation to Misplaced Pages's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. 146.200.32.196 (talk) 14:25, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Those are old edits that I was already called out on. I don't think its fair to report me for that. Even though I know the new trend is to try and get me blocked. Koala15 (talk) 15:28, 8 August 2015 (UTC)