| Revision as of 18:31, 27 August 2015 editZzuuzz (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators136,853 edits →Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments: cmt← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:58, 1 September 2015 edit undoVanjagenije (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators130,561 edits Declining checkuserNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| ===15 August 2015=== | ===15 August 2015=== | ||
| {{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|decline}} | ||
| ;Suspected sockpuppets | ;Suspected sockpuppets | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
| ====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== | ====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== | ||
| *Not entirely sure what's going on here, but it is worth noting that the reporter is using open proxies. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 18:30, 27 August 2015 (UTC) | *Not entirely sure what's going on here, but it is worth noting that the reporter is using open proxies. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 18:30, 27 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
| *{{Decline}} - Evidence is mostly circumstantial, not convincing at all. We need a much, much stronger evidence to run a CheckUser check. '''] ]''' 18:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | ||
Revision as of 18:58, 1 September 2015
Biruitorul
Biruitorul (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Biruitorul/Archive.
15 August 2015
– An SPI clerk has declined a request for CheckUser, and the case is now awaiting a behavioural investigation.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Biruitorul (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Dahn (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- 98.217.224.217 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
furthermore i suspect there should be at least one more sock, also good editor with decent number of edits across wikipedias. please see Editor Interaction Analysers for users Biruitorul and Dahn
Biruitorul and Dahn, they have a lot of intersected edits, including a lot of AFDs and DYK nominations like Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Ghenadie_Petrescu. Very interesting behavior is noticeable here here. See this , Biruitorul was reported, and from nowhere appeared Dahn to defend him.
Dahn writes on his userpages: "Please note: the only three accounts I own are on the English and Romanian wikipedias (for the Romanian one, see ro:Utilizator:Dahn), and on commons. I do not own any other accounts under any other name, and the accounts with the name "Dahn" on any wikipedias other than the aforementioned are not mine—in fact, I'm willing to bet they were created by banned users solely for the purpose of disruption."
"Thief shouting thief"
see also Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Biruitorul/Archive and Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive874#AfD_spilling_over_into_SPI
IP address 98.217.224.217 is 100% Biruitorul see we just need CU confirmation. i can't find the logic. He starts AFDs as Biruitorul and adds them to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Log as anonimous... Genious!
See Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ellie White: Biruitorul started AFD and Dahn defended idea of deletion more aggressive than Biruitorul.
See on Dahn's userpage an award from Biruitorul: "As a fellow Stalinist...." Really?! "Fellow Stalinist"? In WWII Stalin annexed a big part of Romania, so Romanian Stalinists should be something there strange and very rare. As they are both Romanians Wikipedians, there can be a connection between the two.
- Something fresh, see here https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Alexandre_Gurita&action=history --123.150.107.24 (talk) 16:05, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Not entirely sure what's going on here, but it is worth noting that the reporter is using open proxies. -- zzuuzz 18:30, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Clerk declined - Evidence is mostly circumstantial, not convincing at all. We need a much, much stronger evidence to run a CheckUser check. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Categories: