| Revision as of 13:28, 26 August 2015 editBenMcLean (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users878 edits →Possibly← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:39, 19 September 2015 edit undoGamaliel (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators93,925 edits →Standard notification: new sectionTag: contentious topics alertNext edit → | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| Thanks. I actually think . They pretty much covered all of the main points of the ], or at least Misplaced Pages's perspective on it, without that annoying "neutral point of view" getting in the way, requiring them to actually quote some people who might know something about it at any point. --] (]) 13:28, 26 August 2015 (UTC) | Thanks. I actually think . They pretty much covered all of the main points of the ], or at least Misplaced Pages's perspective on it, without that annoying "neutral point of view" getting in the way, requiring them to actually quote some people who might know something about it at any point. --] (]) 13:28, 26 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == Standard notification == | |||
| {{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' | |||
| '''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ] <small>(])</small> 15:39, 19 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:39, 19 September 2015
RLDS article
I copied the following from the article Talk:Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints:
IvoShandor is correct. This article, as written currently, has nothing to do with the title. It should be merged into Community of Christ article or the Restoration Branches article. You guys take your pick. It is not significant enough to stand on it's own. Ben, what is your opinion about a merge; you pick the most appropriate article? --Storm Rider 16:23, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
What are your thoughts? --Storm Rider 16:23, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
I thought I already gave them. Haven't had much time for wikipedia in a long while. --BenMcLean (talk) 21:40, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Reformed Egyptian
Actually, Mormon 9:32 does use the phrase "reformed Egyptian". ...comments? ~BFizz 23:35, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- That's good to know. Thank you very much. For some reason I couldn't find where the phrase originated anywhere! The Book of Mormon article should cite where that is found when it first uses the term. --BenMcLean (talk) 19:43, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the info
...Here! Btw, Ben, do you have an Internet link to a document or publication (or I suppose such a document's or publication's publisher's name (if known), publication name, title (if any), author (if known), and date (if known) that does so) that can be used as a citation to verify this information you've helpfully provided?--Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden (talk) 21:36, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. When you recently edited Restoration Branches, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberal theology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:28, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dark Side of the Rainbow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mashup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Your comment...
You made a statement on the talk page of List of sports team names and mascots derived from indigenous peoples that the article is "one-sided". If you have WP:reliable sources to support this opinion, the remedy is to edit the article using those sources. Otherwise you are stating a personal opinion, which is of no use in the building of an encyclopedia.
(PS. New sections to a talk page are added to the bottom, not the top. This is automatically done when using the "New section" option at the top of every page.) FriendlyFred (talk) 06:10, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Possibly
|
The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
| ...the best thing I've ever read on wiki. Thank you and congratulations. 104.238.169.122 (talk) 13:22, 26 August 2015 (UTC) |
Thanks. I actually think Illogicopedia covered it better than Misplaced Pages. They pretty much covered all of the main points of the GamerGate controversy, or at least Misplaced Pages's perspective on it, without that annoying "neutral point of view" getting in the way, requiring them to actually quote some people who might know something about it at any point. --BenMcLean (talk) 13:28, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Standard notification
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.