| Revision as of 20:42, 29 September 2015 editAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,562,596 editsm Substing templates: {{uw-3rr}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:21, 29 September 2015 edit undoHawljo (talk | contribs)26 editsm →Talk page: Abortion is intentional, miscarriage is not.Next edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| ==Talk page== | ==Talk page== | ||
| Please join the discussion. ] (] · ] · ]) 17:53, 28 September 2015 (UTC) | Please join the discussion. ] (] · ] · ]) 17:53, 28 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :: DOC James, this is Hawljo. Why do you keep reverting my edit, four times now with no explanations or justifications? The following quote is from the referenced medical dictionary: Abortion- termination of pregnancy before the fetus is viable. In the medical sense, this term and the term miscarriage both refer to the termination of pregnancy before the fetus is capable of survival outside the uterus. The term abortion is more commonly used as a synonym for induced abortion, the deliberate interruption of pregnancy, as opposed to miscarriage, which connotes a spontaneous or natural loss of the fetus. Because of this distinction made by the average layperson, care should be exercised in the use of the word abortion when speaking of a spontaneous loss of the fetus. Spontaneous abortion- termination of pregnancy before the fetus is sufficiently developed to survive; called miscarriage by laypersons. ] (]) 22:17, 29 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == September 2015 == | == September 2015 == | ||
Revision as of 22:21, 29 September 2015
March 2013
Hello, I'm Dawn Bard. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Sexual orientation without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dawn Bard (talk) 15:10, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Talk page
Please join the discussion. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:53, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- DOC James, this is Hawljo. Why do you keep reverting my edit, four times now with no explanations or justifications? The following quote is from the referenced medical dictionary: Abortion- termination of pregnancy before the fetus is viable. In the medical sense, this term and the term miscarriage both refer to the termination of pregnancy before the fetus is capable of survival outside the uterus. The term abortion is more commonly used as a synonym for induced abortion, the deliberate interruption of pregnancy, as opposed to miscarriage, which connotes a spontaneous or natural loss of the fetus. Because of this distinction made by the average layperson, care should be exercised in the use of the word abortion when speaking of a spontaneous loss of the fetus. Spontaneous abortion- termination of pregnancy before the fetus is sufficiently developed to survive; called miscarriage by laypersons. Hawljo (talk) 22:17, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
September 2015
Your recent editing history at Miscarriage shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:39, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Septmber 2015
Your recent editing history at The Naked Communist shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JohnInDC (talk) 19:51, 29 September 2015 (UTC)