| Revision as of 00:21, 26 September 2015 editReferenceBot (talk | contribs)48,157 edits Bot: Notice of potential reference breaking← Previous edit |
Revision as of 07:25, 4 October 2015 edit undoStrivingsoul (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users841 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → |
| Line 65: |
Line 65: |
|
|} |
|
|} |
|
|}<!--Template:WelcomeMenu--> |
|
|}<!--Template:WelcomeMenu--> |
|
|
|
|
== Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, Strivingsoul. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ].<!--Template:NPOVN-notice--> Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
|
== Houthis == |
|
|
|
|
|
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> --] (]) 17:48, 3 April 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
{{tb|Talk:Houthis#Iranian arms}} --] (]) 17:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Disambiguation link notification for April 17== |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:05, 17 April 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion== |
|
|
] |
|
|
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. -] (]) 03:25, 18 April 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. -] (]) 16:51, 22 April 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== April 2015 == |
|
|
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' for ] editing and personal attacks, such as . Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. ] | ] 19:49, 22 April 2015 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> |
|
|
|
|
|
] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ]. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 18:11, 25 April 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Notification: general sanctions for the ] and the ]== |
|
|
{{Ivmbox |
|
|
|'''Please read this notification carefully:'''<br>A ] has authorised the use of ] for pages related to the ] and the ]. The details of these sanctions are described ]. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a ''']''', as described ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
] is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged ]. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. |
|
|
|
|
|
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. |
|
|
| Commons-emblem-notice.svg |
|
|
| icon size = 50px}} - ] ] 19:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Edit Warring at Death to America == |
|
|
|
|
|
== Edit Warring == |
|
|
|
|
|
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> - ] <span style="font-size:85%">(])</span> 07:36, 6 September 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:There was no edit warring, {{ping|SantiLak}}! We were discussing along the reverts to reach consensus! ] (]) 07:42, 6 September 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
::You were edit warring at the time, I warned both of you so you would know that you were technically edit warring and so you don't continue to break 3RR, it's a friendly notice as much as the notice seems slightly aggressive. - ] <span style="font-size:85%">(])</span> 07:45, 6 September 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
::: Alright, but what's so bad when those good-faith reverts could help us reach a consensus? Anyway, I take note of that for future disputes. ] (]) 07:51, 6 September 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Discretionary sanctions notice - arab-israeli conflict, BLP == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' |
|
|
|
|
|
'''Please carefully read this information:''' |
|
|
|
|
|
The Arbitration Committee has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding the ], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. |
|
|
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> --]<small><sup>\ ] /</sup></small> 07:17, 7 September 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' |
|
|
|
|
|
'''Please carefully read this information:''' |
|
|
|
|
|
The Arbitration Committee has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. |
|
|
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> --]<small><sup>\ ] /</sup></small> 07:17, 7 September 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
== Reference errors on 25 September == |
|
|
|
|
|
] Hello, I'm ]. I have '''automatically detected''' that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. {{#ifeq:1|1|It is|They are}} as follows: |
|
|
*On the ] page, caused a ] <small>(])</small>. ( | ) |
|
|
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a ], you can . |
|
|
Thanks, <!-- User:ReferenceBot/inform -->] (]) 00:21, 26 September 2015 (UTC) |
|
