Misplaced Pages

:Administrators' noticeboard/Personal attacks: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:25, 9 August 2006 editNihonjoe (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Template editors124,533 edits →Attack article: seems fine to me← Previous edit Revision as of 20:40, 9 August 2006 edit undoWoohookitty (talk | contribs)Administrators611,225 edits →Attack article: not a personal attack. removedNext edit →
Line 34: Line 34:
Even after warning, etc., Taeguk Warrior continues to make personal attacks, the worst being the making a "list of stalkers" on his user page. A brief perusal of his comments shows him calling others "jap wannabes" ], etc. Even after warning, etc., Taeguk Warrior continues to make personal attacks, the worst being the making a "list of stalkers" on his user page. A brief perusal of his comments shows him calling others "jap wannabes" ], etc.
:I have warned the user, and asked him to remove the list of stalkers from his user page. ] <sup>]</sup> 17:26, 9 August 2006 (UTC) :I have warned the user, and asked him to remove the list of stalkers from his user page. ] <sup>]</sup> 17:26, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

===Attack article===

I'm not sure if this is the place to report it but this seems to be an attack article.

]

:'''Barbara Schwarz''', ''née'' '''Bretschneider''', is an ] <ref name="slctrib">{{cite news|last=Smith|first=Christopher|url=http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Secrets/barbara_schwarz.html|title=S.L. Woman's Quest Strains Public Records System|publisher=The Salt Lake Tribune|date=]}}</ref> from ] living in ], ]. She is known for filing a record number of requests under the ], for filing a large number of ]s, and for posting a large number of articles to ] newsgroups.

I have tried all that I could to try to correct the problem with the article and its discussion page.] 18:32, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

::Hmm...it doesn't seem to be an attack article, and it very thoroughly documents any claims made in the article. ···]<sup>] · <small>] <font color="darkblue">to</font> ]]o]</small></sup> 19:25, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:40, 9 August 2006

Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles and content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards


    Red crossThis is a failed proposal.
    Consensus for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use the talk page or initiate a thread at the village pump.
    This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference.
    Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump.
    ShortcutThis page is intended to get attention quickly when dealing with personal attacks. It is not intended to serve as a form of mediation or a type of RFC. Only Personal attacks are dealt with on this page, on their own merits in accordance with Misplaced Pages's No Personal Attacks policy

    For editors who want a personal attack situation reviewed:

    1. Consider that in most cases, ignoring the attack is better than requesting sanction against the attacker. Do not report people if you are likewise guilty of hostility towards them.
    2. Make sure the user has actually commited a personal attack. (Please note that "personal attacks" are defined only under the WP:NPA policy. If a statement is not considered a personal attack under the intended spirit of this policy, it does not belong here.)
    3. The editor must have been warned earlier. The {{npa2}}, and {{npa3}} templates may be appropriate for new users; for long-term editors, it's preferable to write something rather than using a standard template. Reports of unwarned editors may be removed.
    4. If the behavior hasn't stopped, add the following header to the New Reports section of this page in the following format:
      ==={{User|NAME OF USER}}=== replacing NAME OF USER with the user name or IP address concerned, with a brief reason for listing below. Be sure to include diffs.
    5. If an editor removes the IP or username and doesn't handle the matter to your satisfaction, take it to the editor's talk page or the administrators' noticeboard, but do not re-list the user here.
    6. NB - Due to misunderstanding of these instructions and/or mis-use of this process, comments not in strict adhereance to these instructions WILL be removed. This page deals only with personal attacks under the policy WP:NPA. Reports deemed to be inappropriate for this page are liable to be moved to an appropriate venue where one exists.


    For those reported on this page:

    1. A reviewer or an administrator will review each report on this page. In dealing with the report, the contribution history of the reported user shall be checked along with the diffs provided in the report. Where no personal attack is evident, then no action will be taken - however, should an administrator see that another seperate issue is evident, appropriate action or advice for that issue may be taken/given at his or her discretion and in line with wiki policy.
    2. Reports on this page stand on their own merits in accordance with Misplaced Pages's no personal attacks policy. As such, disputes and discussions over reports are not suitable for this page except for such comments left by admins or reviewers describing their actions and/or findings. If you notice your account reported at this page, please trust that the administrators and reviewers dealing with reports will deal with it in an even-handed and fair manner on the basis of policy alone. If you feel strongly that another "side to the story", issue, or another piece of information is missing from a report please refrain from posting here, and instead leave your comment on your talk page under the title NPA Report or another other clear and related title. The reviewing party will see this message and take it into account where applicable.

    For users handling assistance requests:

    1. For each of the users linked here, open their contributions and check for personal attacks. Also check if the users have been sufficiently warned for the current personal attack and whether they've continued to commit personal attacks after being warned.
    2. Note that there is an important difference between a user who makes many good contributions and a few personal attacks, and a user whose last edits are (nearly) all personal attacks or other conflict.
    3. Do nothing, warn them again, or, if you are an adminstrator, block the user in question as you think is required. Explain things carefully to the user who listed the attacker if you feel there's been a misunderstanding.
    4. Move the report to the Open Reports section and give an update to the status of the report.
    5. Delete old reports that have been dealt with.

    Please consider adding this page to your watchlist to make life easier for non-administrator RC-patrollers.

    New reports

    Demfourlife (talk · contribs)

    My perception is that this posting on the Fidel Castro talk page is personally threatening. Also, the post appears to have been made through an open proxy.

    RPJ (talk · contribs)

    Despite being warned, and blocked previously, RPJ has continued to make personal attacks against Gamaliel, , and as well as harass him on his user page.

    Bakasuprman (talk · contribs)

    This user is developing a history of personal attacks: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .

    He comments that he has no intention to tone down his rhetoric , although several people have suggested to him that he stop violating WP:NPA. , , , , , . BhaiSaab 18:58, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

    Open reports

    80.41.128.70 (talk · contribs)

    The IP accuses me of being a Fascist, an utter disgrace, willfully misinforming, character assasinating and pursuing deceptive ways. He uses my talk page as a attack page:

    "I don't have the time to deal with people so stubborn in their efforts to silence me from posting the truth. I hope openminded readers of wikipedia are drawn to reading his comments section so they become further aware of the depths this man will fall to."

    Both Muslim_Council_of_Britain and Inayat_Bunglawala have been object of blankening vandalism by "Tiscali UK Ltd" IPs, as is 80.41.128.70. Most of these have been warned for vandalism - I suspect them to be of the same source. --tickle me 09:24, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

    I warned him. --Woohookitty 10:21, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

    Attic Owl (talk · contribs)

    This individual referred to me with a term which implies that I am a sex worker. This is libel per se, and definitely a personal attack. See . The user should be, at least, sternly warned, if not actually blocked. I encourage a thorough examination of this user's contributions.

    The user has been blocked by freakofnurture. Tom Harrison 17:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

    Taeguk Warrior (talk · contribs)

    Even after warning, etc., Taeguk Warrior continues to make personal attacks, the worst being the making a "list of stalkers" on his user page. A brief perusal of his comments shows him calling others "jap wannabes" ], etc.

    I have warned the user, and asked him to remove the list of stalkers from his user page. Tom Harrison 17:26, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
    Categories: