Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 11:36, 10 August 2006

Title

This may not be the best name - please feel free to rename it as you see fit! Tell me to get back to work! 06:47, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Why not rename it "2006 transatlantic plane terror plot"? — Rickyrab | Talk 08:47, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm not happy with "plane" to be honest... do we have any precedents we could use? Budgiekiller 08:48, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

This has Al Qaeda written all over it. Need I mention the bombs/simultanious mid-air detonations in the Bojinka plot? If this comes out, how's about "2006 Al Qaeda Transatlantic Terror Plot"?--DasGooch 08:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

The name of the group is almost never used in article titles. --Golbez 09:05, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

"2006 Transatlantic terror plot"? Budgiekiller 09:08, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm a newb. Pardon. Though, I am liking "2006 Transatlantic terror plot." --DasGooch 09:10, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Or should I say "2006 transatlantic terror plot"? Budgiekiller 09:24, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

But the word "terror" used in this way is so nasty! What ever happened to terrorism or terrorist plots? MyNameIsClare talk 09:25, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

True enough. "2006 transatlantic terrorist plot"? Budgiekiller 09:26, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

That sounds good for me. Tell me to get back to work! 09:32, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps we should wait until there is more information, like confirmation of the outbound and destination airports, or airlines, or groups involved. Anything we do now will just have to be changed later, and I'm not sure that this suggestion is any more descriptive or correct. |→ Spaully°τ 09:36, 10 August 2006 (GMT)

Sure. I'm not going to lose any sleep over it. Budgiekiller 09:38, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

I say "2006 transatlantic flight explosion plot". Will 10:25, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Wow, seems like someone doesn't like to discuss changes. Page has now been renamed, and badly in my opinion. Budgiekiller 10:37, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Can we please reach some sort of consensus before changing the title again? --Zimbabweed 10:40, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

And when we do, can we spell it properly please?! Budgiekiller 10:40, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Terror level?

It said the level was raised from "'severe' to 'critical'", but there are two severes on Joint Terrorist Analysis Centre. So which one is it? WP 09:20, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

The Home Office site only has one "severe" MyNameIsClare talk 09:26, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

From what I gather, UK went to the highest. In the US, specific flights are now bumped up to their own "Red" level. --DasGooch 09:46, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

The U.S. is at orange for domestic flights and red for U.K. flights.--66.188.202.116 09:48, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Links

I notice that we are putting all sorts of links to actual terrorists incidents - at the moment all we have is a CLAIM of a incident. This could be just another forrest gate or ricin plot type case, however by putting in the links aren't we engaged in a form of crystal-balling ?

--Charlesknight 09:31, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Agreed. We should probably (at the most) link to foiled plots (e.g. shoe bomber), but as you say, eve that is, perhaps, ball-gazing. Budgiekiller 09:32, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

The rationale behind the Flight 182 link was that it was a transatlantic bombing. I do agree that we need to maintain a healthy skepticism here though. Tell me to get back to work! 09:37, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Removed the lists... Tell me to get back to work! 09:40, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

The ricin plot was real, several people were convicted of conspiracy to cause a public nuisance, which is a serious offence, carrying a maximun sentnece of life in prison.Dolive21 10:57, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Several people? Then the BBC and wikipedia are wrong. According to Wood Green no-ricin plot & only 1 person (who was not convicted of conspiracy to commit murder because of a hang jury). Everyone else charged was acquited and several other people charged had their cases dropped. Also, from what I can tell no evidence of ricin was found Bourgass may not have been a very nice person, he was convicted of murder previously and a plot may even have been considered but there is no real clear evidence it got very far. Nil Einne 11:13, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Number of Planes

Does anyone know the number of planes that were planning to be blown up. All news stations giving different numbers Sky News: 6 CNN: 20 BBC: 5

sam

The BBC and police have both said "up to 10". CNN would inflate things... Budgiekiller 10:33, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

I guess they have a dilemma nowdays. If they say 10, then everyone will think it's 5. So what should they do? Nil Einne 11:14, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Name

not "airplane" please. Rich Farmbrough 10:40 10 August 2006 (GMT).

• Budgiekiller changed it. plane is more sepcific than craft though.. no helicopters involved. --Irishpunktom\ 10:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

just wanted to ask if tansatlantic, without R in it is good, when it was moved to it :) --195.56.248.2 10:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

• That was my fault! --Irishpunktom\ 10:44, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

• • Folks, this is an allegation. The title should reflect as much. --Irishpunktom\ 10:44, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

No, the title should reflect the common perception. The article can challenge that.

Rich Farmbrough 10:48 10 August 2006 (GMT).

no, the name should be as neutral as the article! --Irishpunktom\ 10:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

People, please stop renaming this article continously. We'll figure out the best name later. You are creating a vast amount of double redirects here. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 10:48, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Please please stop changing the title every two minutes, I can hardly follow which redirect is redirecting me to the redirect... Budgiekiller 10:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

"plane" is fine with or without the apostrophe... Rich Farmbrough 10:51 10 August 2006 (GMT).

The POV title tag is fine for now, at least give it some rest for the coming hours. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 10:53, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

The POV-title tag is horrible considering that this is on the Main Page. It's not a POV title, just one that is not consensually agreed yet. violet/riga (t) 10:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC))

POV tag removed is also fine with me, as long as people stop moving the article around. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 10:55, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

The title has a pov, as such, the {{POV-title}} is fine. --Irishpunktom\ 11:31, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Time

"It was confirmed by a Metropolitan Police Service deputy commissioner that 21 people were in custody as of 9:49 GMT after arrests in both London and the West Midlands." Are we surte this isn't "BST" ? Rich Farmbrough 10:50 10 August 2006 (GMT).

I just added a CNN ref for that. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 10:59, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks.

It's become "this morning" by now, no need for excess precision. Shimgray | talk | 11:13, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

High Wycombe

I've been told that a house was raided in High Wycombe (where I live) - there are three news helicopters going around filming! Trampikey 10:55, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Flights from Paris

These were cancelled, but I don't rmember if it was the Airport on Air France that reported it. ANyone fill the gap? Rich Farmbrough 10:59 10 August 2006 (GMT).

http://challengestempsreel.nouvelobs.com/business/art_57977.html ("L'état du réseau")

- British Airways: no flights in destination of europe until 2pm GMT.

- Lufthansa et Air Berlin: flights going to great britain cancelled. until 2pm (Lufthansa).

- Bruxelles' airport: flights from and to london cancelled or delayed.

- Air France: flights to london cancelled until 12h GMT. air france will reassess the situation in the afternoon.

- Portugal : flights to london cancelled, in the following airports: Lisbon, Porto, Faro 's international airports, and for the following airlines: TAP Portugal, British Airways, Air France, Lufthansa and Olympic Airlines.

- Alitalia (italian): No planes to london in the morning

- Ryanair (lowcost, italian): all planes to great britain cancelled for today.

- Iberia: flights cancelled untill 12 gmt.

- Qantas : Increased security check for all flights from and to great brittain. Passengers will only be able to take the bare minimum with them inside the plane: passport, waller, plane tickets, preferably in a transparant bag.

- KLM: all planes to London-Heathrow cancelled until further notice.

- aéroport de Nice: 1.500 passengers waiting.

- BAA has asked that all planes going to London-Heathrow that had not yet departed be kept on hold.

FiP 11:32, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

International Reactions

Can everyone try to find international reactions, I have only been able to find U.S. reactions. Hello32020 11:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

It's still rather early yet... Everyone is trying to marshall their facts before the go PRing. --Signed and Sealed, JJJJust (T C) 11:22, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Cite for gridlock

here's the Today programme which reported it. Rich Farmbrough 11:13 10 August 2006 (GMT).

I can't get that link to work. Have you got a text source? WLD 11:31, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

gatwick

flights out of gatwick are going ahead, i just phoned US airways and they said flights are as normal.

--Greg.loutsenko 11:29, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Yes, the referenced BBC News article was updated - it originally said all flights (as announced on the live BBC News TV stream). zoney ♣ talk 11:36, 10 August 2006 (UTC)