| Revision as of 19:18, 9 August 2006 editMrDarwin (talk | contribs)2,601 edits Partial revert & removing unsubstantiated "fact" regarding italics← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:09, 10 August 2006 edit undoBrya (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,919 edits Again trying to straighten this. Assuming 100-200 languages in the native area of Bellis perennis × 20 names/language = 2000-4000 names already. Leaving out the old (=typewriter) exceptionsNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| A '''botanical name''' is a formal name conforming to the '']''. The purpose of such a formal name is to have a single name worldwide for a particular plant or plant group. For example the botanical name '']'' is used worldwide for a plant species that goes by |
A '''botanical name''' is a formal name conforming to the '']''. The purpose of such a formal name is to have a single name worldwide for a particular plant or plant group. For example the botanical name '']'' is used worldwide for a plant species that goes by hundreds, if not thousands, of common names in hundreds of languages. It has a history of many centuries in most of the countries of Europe and the Middle East: it has accumulated names in all the langages of that area: in a single language dozens of names may easily occur. Later it has been introduced worldwide, bringing it into contact with languages on all continents. English names for this plant species include , ], ], etc. | ||
| The usefulness of botanical names is limited by the fact that taxonomic groups are not fixed in size: a taxon may have a varying ]. That is, one particular botanical name may refer to a group that is small according to some people and big according to others. This will depend on taxonomic viewpoint or ]. The traditional view of the family '']'' sets the size of the family at over a thousand species, but in the modern approach it counts over four thousand species. The botanical name itself is fixed by a ], the size and placement of the ] it applies to is set by a taxonomist. Some botanical names refer to groups that are very stable (for example ''Leguminosae'') while other names are notorious in that a careful check is needed (for example ''Fabaceae'', ''Scrophulariaceae'', ''Urticaceae'', etc). | The usefulness of botanical names is limited by the fact that taxonomic groups are not fixed in size: a taxon may have a varying ]. That is, one particular botanical name may refer to a group that is small according to some people and big according to others. This will depend on taxonomic viewpoint or ]. The traditional view of the family '']'' sets the size of the family at over a thousand species, but in the modern approach it counts over four thousand species. The botanical name itself is fixed by a ], the size and placement of the ] it applies to is set by a taxonomist. Some botanical names refer to groups that are very stable (for example ''Leguminosae'') while other names are notorious in that a careful check is needed (for example ''Fabaceae'', ''Scrophulariaceae'', ''Urticaceae'', etc). | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| A name in three parts, i.e. the name of an ] (below the rank of species) needs a "connecting term" to indicate rank. In the ''Theobroma''-example above this is "subsp." (for subspecies). In botany there are many ranks below that of species (in zoology there is only one such rank, i.e. subspecies, so that this "connecting term" is unnecessary there). A name of a "subdivison of a genus" also needs a connecting term (in the ''Acacia''-example above this is "subg.", subgenus). Such a connecting term is not part of the name itself. | A name in three parts, i.e. the name of an ] (below the rank of species) needs a "connecting term" to indicate rank. In the ''Theobroma''-example above this is "subsp." (for subspecies). In botany there are many ranks below that of species (in zoology there is only one such rank, i.e. subspecies, so that this "connecting term" is unnecessary there). A name of a "subdivison of a genus" also needs a connecting term (in the ''Acacia''-example above this is "subg.", subgenus). Such a connecting term is not part of the name itself. | ||
| A taxon may be indicated by a listing in more than three parts: "''Saxifraga aizoon'' var. ''aizoon'' subvar. ''brevifolia'' f. ''multicaulis'' subf. ''surculosa'' Engl. & Irmsch." but this is a classification, not a formal botanical name. The botanical name is ''Saxifraga aizoon'' subf. ''surculosa'' Engl. & Irmsch. (''ICBN'', Art 24, Ex 1) | A taxon may be indicated by a listing in more than three parts: "''Saxifraga aizoon'' var. ''aizoon'' subvar. ''brevifolia'' f. ''multicaulis'' subf. ''surculosa'' Engl. & Irmsch." but this is a classification, not a formal botanical name. The botanical name is ''Saxifraga aizoon'' subf. ''surculosa'' Engl. & Irmsch. (''ICBN'', Art 24, Ex 1). | ||
| In print botanical names are often italicized. The example set by the ''ICBN'' is to italicize all botanical names. A substantial minority of botanical publications has indeed adopted this style (and so have some non-botanical publications), but in practice a great number of styles are in use concerning typesetting of botanical names. Some botanical publications do not italicize any botanical names at all. It is not uncommon for botanical publications to use different styles of typesetting in different parts of one and the same work. In the US the commonly adopted style in botanical publications is to reserve italics for names at the rank of genus and below. | |||
| A botanical name is one of several kinds of "]s". Other scientific names are ], ] or ] names. | A botanical name is one of several kinds of "]s". Other scientific names are ], ] or ] names. | ||
Revision as of 20:09, 10 August 2006
.jpg)
A botanical name is a formal name conforming to the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (ICBN). The purpose of such a formal name is to have a single name worldwide for a particular plant or plant group. For example the botanical name Bellis perennis is used worldwide for a plant species that goes by hundreds, if not thousands, of common names in hundreds of languages. It has a history of many centuries in most of the countries of Europe and the Middle East: it has accumulated names in all the langages of that area: in a single language dozens of names may easily occur. Later it has been introduced worldwide, bringing it into contact with languages on all continents. English names for this plant species include lawndaisy, common daisy, daisy, etc.
The usefulness of botanical names is limited by the fact that taxonomic groups are not fixed in size: a taxon may have a varying circumscription. That is, one particular botanical name may refer to a group that is small according to some people and big according to others. This will depend on taxonomic viewpoint or taxonomic system. The traditional view of the family Malvaceae sets the size of the family at over a thousand species, but in the modern approach it counts over four thousand species. The botanical name itself is fixed by a type, the size and placement of the taxon it applies to is set by a taxonomist. Some botanical names refer to groups that are very stable (for example Leguminosae) while other names are notorious in that a careful check is needed (for example Fabaceae, Scrophulariaceae, Urticaceae, etc).
Depending on rank, botanical names may be in one part (genus and above), two parts (species and above, but below the rank of genus) or three parts (below the rank of species):
- in one part
- Plantae (the plants)
- Hepaticae (the liverworts)
- Magnoliopsida (class including the family Magnoliaceae)
- Liliidae (subclass including the family Liliaceae)
- Coniferae (the conifers)
- Fagaceae (the oak family)
- Leguminosae (the pea or legume family)
- Betula (the birch genus)
- in two parts
- Acacia subg. Phyllodineae (the wattles)
- Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)
- in three parts
- Theobroma cacao subsp. cacao (criollo chocolate)
A name in three parts, i.e. the name of an infraspecific taxon (below the rank of species) needs a "connecting term" to indicate rank. In the Theobroma-example above this is "subsp." (for subspecies). In botany there are many ranks below that of species (in zoology there is only one such rank, i.e. subspecies, so that this "connecting term" is unnecessary there). A name of a "subdivison of a genus" also needs a connecting term (in the Acacia-example above this is "subg.", subgenus). Such a connecting term is not part of the name itself.
A taxon may be indicated by a listing in more than three parts: "Saxifraga aizoon var. aizoon subvar. brevifolia f. multicaulis subf. surculosa Engl. & Irmsch." but this is a classification, not a formal botanical name. The botanical name is Saxifraga aizoon subf. surculosa Engl. & Irmsch. (ICBN, Art 24, Ex 1).
In print botanical names are often italicized. The example set by the ICBN is to italicize all botanical names. A substantial minority of botanical publications has indeed adopted this style (and so have some non-botanical publications), but in practice a great number of styles are in use concerning typesetting of botanical names. Some botanical publications do not italicize any botanical names at all. It is not uncommon for botanical publications to use different styles of typesetting in different parts of one and the same work. In the US the commonly adopted style in botanical publications is to reserve italics for names at the rank of genus and below.
A botanical name is one of several kinds of "scientific names". Other scientific names are zoological, bacterial or viral names.
Category: