Misplaced Pages

Talk:List of state highways in Vermont: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:05, 11 August 2006 editSPUI (talk | contribs)75,418 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 06:09, 11 August 2006 edit undoSeicer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,321 edits →ReformatNext edit →
Line 21: Line 21:
==Reformat== ==Reformat==
The new format had the effect of making the table bigger for no reason, and split U.S. Routes from their spurs. I see no reason to use it. --] (] - ]) 06:05, 11 August 2006 (UTC) The new format had the effect of making the table bigger for no reason, and split U.S. Routes from their spurs. I see no reason to use it. --] (] - ]) 06:05, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

:Your vandalism has been noted: ] <small>(]) (])</small> 06:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:09, 11 August 2006

Template:Vermont Routes WikiProject

See the completion list for coordinating redirects.

F routes

  • F1?
  • F2?
  • F3 Grand Isle Ferry (US 2 at Keeler Bay to US 2 south of Grand Isle via Gordon Landing) - now 314
  • F4? Burlington Ferry
  • F5 Essex Ferry (US 7 east of Charlotte to ferry)
  • F6?
  • F7 ? (US 7 in Vergennes to ferry?)
  • F8?
  • F9 (22A at Shoreham to 22A west of Orwell via Larrabees Point)
  • F10 (22A west of Orwell to Chipman Point)
Should these F route descriptions go into their own seperate pages? In other words, is there enough content to warrant a seperate page? Seicer (talk) (contribs) 18:28, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
I don't think there's enough to warrant a separate page (as they are only ferry routes), but perhaps someone from Vermont could shed more light on this issue. On a related note, VT 67A connector is no longer a current route; it was decommissioned in 20032004 and is now part of VT 279. --TMF 19:13, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Reformat

The new format had the effect of making the table bigger for no reason, and split U.S. Routes from their spurs. I see no reason to use it. --SPUI (T - C) 06:05, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Your vandalism has been noted: Seicer (talk) (contribs) 06:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)