Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Catflap08 and Hijiri88/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration | Requests | Case | Catflap08 and Hijiri88 Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 04:55, 20 November 2015 editHijiri88 (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,389 edits →Hijiri88's section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:20, 20 November 2015 edit undoGorillaWarfare (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Oversighters, Administrators119,019 edits →"Japanese culture": reNext edit →
Line 14:		Line 14:

	Also note that the above is not a threat to leave the project if Topic Ban II passes. I will still contribute to Misplaced Pages. Just that depending on what is meant by "Japanese culture" (Is it "Japanese culture" as opposed "Japanese history"? Does it "narrowly construed" so as only to include the "type" of Japanese culture over which I have disputed with Catflap08?) my activity will be somewhat curtailed, and it seems somewhat arbitrary. For example, probably 90% of my edits outside the Catflap08 dispute have been to articles about Japanese poetry; Catflap08, except for his dispute with me, has ''never'' edited Japanese poetry except in his dispute with me. ] (<small>]]</small>) 04:55, 20 November 2015 (UTC)		Also note that the above is not a threat to leave the project if Topic Ban II passes. I will still contribute to Misplaced Pages. Just that depending on what is meant by "Japanese culture" (Is it "Japanese culture" as opposed "Japanese history"? Does it "narrowly construed" so as only to include the "type" of Japanese culture over which I have disputed with Catflap08?) my activity will be somewhat curtailed, and it seems somewhat arbitrary. For example, probably 90% of my edits outside the Catflap08 dispute have been to articles about Japanese poetry; Catflap08, except for his dispute with me, has ''never'' edited Japanese poetry except in his dispute with me. ] (<small>]]</small>) 04:55, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
			:"Japanese culture" is intended to cover other areas where disruption has occurred, such as ]. This is the correct place to leave comments; the other arbs should be keeping an eye on this page. ] <small>]</small> 07:20, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:20, 20 November 2015

This page is for statements regarding the proposed decision, not discussion.
Therefore, with the exception of arbitrators and clerks, all editors must create a section for their statement and comment only in their own section.

Main case page (Talk) — Evidence (Talk) — Workshop (Talk) — Proposed decision (Talk)

Case clerk: TBD Drafting arbitrator: TBD

Misplaced Pages Arbitration

About arbitration Talk Arbitration policy (CU/OS) Guide to arbitration Noticeboard + Talk Search archived proceedings Ban appeals Report
Open proceedings All open requests Case requests Clarification and Amendment requests Arbitrator motion requests Enforcement requests
Active sanctions Contentious topics (Log) General sanctions Editor sanctions
Arbitration Committee Discuss + Contact Members Procedures Elections Talk History Clerks + Talk Clerk procedures Conflict of interest reports
Audit Talk Statistics Talk Reports (pre-2016)

Track related changes
v t e

Behaviour on this page: Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator or clerk, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behavior during a case may also be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision.

Hijiri88's section

"Japanese culture"

@User:GorillaWarfare: "has spilled over to other articles in the Japanese culture topic area" does not seem to be supported by the evidence. "has spilled over to other articles in the Nichiren Buddhism topic area" would be more appropriate. "Japanese culture" is wording used by editors who oppose me in general because they know a topic ban from that area would effectively force me off the project. Catflap08, as he has said himself, has never edited "Japanese culture" articles outside of the extremely narrow area of Nichiren Buddhism, so how my dispute with him could have spilled over into this area escapes me. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 01:32, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

By the way: I'm not sure if this is the appropriate forum for this post -- will the other Arbs even see this? Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 01:33, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Also note that the above is not a threat to leave the project if Topic Ban II passes. I will still contribute to Misplaced Pages. Just that depending on what is meant by "Japanese culture" (Is it "Japanese culture" as opposed "Japanese history"? Does it "narrowly construed" so as only to include the "type" of Japanese culture over which I have disputed with Catflap08?) my activity will be somewhat curtailed, and it seems somewhat arbitrary. For example, probably 90% of my edits outside the Catflap08 dispute have been to articles about Japanese poetry; Catflap08, except for his dispute with me, has never edited Japanese poetry except in his dispute with me. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 04:55, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

"Japanese culture" is intended to cover other areas where disruption has occurred, such as Korean influence on Japanese culture. This is the correct place to leave comments; the other arbs should be keeping an eye on this page. GorillaWarfare (talk) 07:20, 20 November 2015 (UTC)