User talk:TruthIsDivine: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 23:28, 6 December 2015 editTruthIsDivine (talk \| contribs)49 edits →Gaijin42 inserted fake statistics into the Defensive Gun Use article which I tried to remove, since his references have no citation of the 33 million figure. It is wholly invented. He Removed the accurately cited statistics I added ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:29, 6 December 2015 edit undoGamaliel (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators93,912 edits →Topic ban: new sectionNext edit →
Line 48:		Line 48:
	By the way, this is what the reference that they claim actually supports their "33 million" figure says:		By the way, this is what the reference that they claim actually supports their "33 million" figure says:
	"This paper used survey methods similar to those employed in a recent widely cited study by Kleck and Gertz (1995) and produced comparable results; yet our comparison of estimates based on NSPOF with other sources, together with puzzling inconsistencies in over a third of the defensive gun use (DGU) reports, lead us to conclude that the estimates are far too high. " it does not support 33 million, it actually says the 1 million figure is far ton high. Please think how illogical it is to think that there are 1 million defensive gun uses in the United States, and 1 million violent crimes. This is like claiming "in 200 percent of burglaries, a home alarm prevented the burglary." It DOES NOT MAKE SENSE.		"This paper used survey methods similar to those employed in a recent widely cited study by Kleck and Gertz (1995) and produced comparable results; yet our comparison of estimates based on NSPOF with other sources, together with puzzling inconsistencies in over a third of the defensive gun use (DGU) reports, lead us to conclude that the estimates are far too high. " it does not support 33 million, it actually says the 1 million figure is far ton high. Please think how illogical it is to think that there are 1 million defensive gun uses in the United States, and 1 million violent crimes. This is like claiming "in 200 percent of burglaries, a home alarm prevented the burglary." It DOES NOT MAKE SENSE.

			== Topic ban ==

			==Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction==
			{{Ivmbox
			\|2=Commons-emblem-hand.svg
			\|imagesize=50px
			\|1=The following sanction now applies to you:

			{{Talkquote\|1=indefinite topic ban from all edits regarding governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues}}

			You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to .

			This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an ] under the authority of the ]'s decision at ] and, if applicable, the procedure described at ]. This sanction has been recorded in the ]. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the ] to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be ] for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

			You may appeal this sanction using the process described ]. I recommend that you use the ] if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.<!-- Template:AE sanction.--> ] <small>(])</small> 23:29, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
			}}

Revision as of 23:29, 6 December 2015

The Gary Kleck article is governed in part by the policy at WP:BLP (Biographies of Living People). Potentially controversial information added to that page must be accompanied by a reliable source, which is why I've removed your latest addition. If you provide a source, the information can be returned to the article. Thanks. clpo13_(talk) 22:15, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:TruthIsDivine reported by User:Gaijin42 (Result: ). Thank you. Gaijin42 (talk) 22:16, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gun control

If you read Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gun control#October 2015 you can see that the ban was suspended as of October. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:28, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Rs chen 7754 22:37, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Template:Z8

Note to any reviewing administrator: this user is likely violating other policies (and is editing contentiously in an ArbCom-related area) and I will not object to any firmer sanctions that another admin implements. --Rs chen 7754 22:39, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Rschen7754 In a case of exceptionally poor timing I just finished making this report Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#TruthIsDivine you may wish to drop in and shortcircuit the report since he's already blocked, but with the personal attacks and edit warring, I think WP:NOTHERE may be in play. Gaijin42 (talk) 22:40, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Gaijin42 inserted fake statistics into the Defensive Gun Use article which I tried to remove, since his references have no citation of the 33 million figure. It is wholly invented. He Removed the accurately cited statistics I added

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

TruthIsDivine (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Friends, I come here to save Misplaced Pages from an evil scourge who goes by the name of Gaijin. His heart is black and he owns more guns than the militaries of several nations, and he only recently ended a 1 year ban for posting in gun control articles. What was the first thing he did? He made up a 33 million figure from a study which ACTUALLY said that Kleck's estimate of 1 million was far too high! He is thus, my friends, a vandal of the worst kind: the kind who sleeps amongst us, pretending he is one of us, when he is no servant of truth at all. He lied and he deserves ostracism, if not the death penalty. Further , I introduced citations from the Harvard School of Public Health that demonstrably refute his overemphasized 20 year old study, as well as a recent study of ALL POLICE Reports nationally, which showed only 1584 defensive gun uses reported in 2014. If his figures are correct, that would mean there are 2 million unreported defensive gun uses for every one the police know about. Please! The study he references in fact says explicitly that the 1 million figure is too high. He supplies no quotation to justify the 33 million figure, which is vandalism. God save this once-great encyclopedia from itself! The end times are nigh!

Gaijin42 inserted fake statistics into the Defensive Gun Use article which I tried to remove, since his references have no citation of the 33 million figure. It is wholly invented. He Removed the accurately cited statistics I added

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

TruthIsDivine (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here TruthIsDivine (talk) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Template:Unblockreason=Your reason here22:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Friends, I come here to save Misplaced Pages from an evil scourge who goes by the name of Gaijin. His heart is black and he owns more guns than the militaries of several nations, and he only recently ended a 1 year ban for posting in gun control articles. What was the first thing he did? He made up a 33 million figure from a study which ACTUALLY said that Kleck's estimate of 1 million was far too high! He is thus, my friends, a vandal of the worst kind: the kind who sleeps amongst us, pretending he is one of us, when he is no servant of truth at all. He lied and he deserves ostracism, if not the death penalty. Further , I introduced citations from the Harvard School of Public Health that demonstrably refute his overemphasized 20 year old study, as well as a recent study of ALL POLICE Reports nationally, which showed only 1584 defensive gun uses reported in 2014. If his figures are correct, that would mean there are 2 million unreported defensive gun uses for every one the police know about. Please! The study he references in fact says explicitly that the 1 million figure is too high. He supplies no quotation to justify the 33 million figure, which is vandalism. God save this once-great encyclopedia from itself! The end times are nigh! 
== Gaijin42 inserted fake statistics into the Defensive Gun Use article which I tried to remove, since his references have no citation of the 33 million figure. It is wholly invented. He Removed the accurately cited statistics I added ==
<span id="rfu"></span>
<div class="user-block unblock user-unblock-request" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #EBF4FF;">
] '''This user is asking that their ] be reviewed''':
] <span class="plainlinks" style="font-size:88%;">( •  •  • ]<span class="sysop-show"> • ]</span> •  • <span class="sysop-show"> • ] • </span><span class="checkuser-show"> •  ()</span>)</span>
<div style="clear:both;" class=></div>
----
'''Request reason''':
<div style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 2em;">your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)</div>
'''Notes''':
* In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please ''']'''. If no block is listed, then you have been ] by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these ] instead for quick attention by an administrator.
* Please read our ] to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed sysop-show" style="border: none;"><div style="background-color: #D0E4FF; font-weight: bold; text-align: center">
] use only:</div>
<div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align: left;">
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "<span class="monospaced">blocking administrator</span>" with the name of the blocking admin:
:<code>{{Unblock on hold |1=''blocking administrator'' |2=''your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)'' |3 = ~~~~}}</code>
If you '''decline''' the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting <code>{{subst:Decline reason here}}</code> with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a ], explaining why the request was declined.
:<code>{{unblock reviewed |1=''your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)'' |decline = ''{{subst:Decline reason here}}'' ~~~~}}</code>
If you '''accept''' the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting <code>Accept reason here</code> with your rationale:
:<code>{{unblock reviewed |1=''your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)'' |accept = ''accept reason here'' ~~~~}}</code>
</div></div></div>
]
]22:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

{{unblock reviewed |1=Friends, I come here to save Misplaced Pages from an evil scourge who goes by the name of Gaijin. His heart is black and he owns more guns than the militaries of several nations, and he only recently ended a 1 year ban for posting in gun control articles. What was the first thing he did? He made up a 33 million figure from a study which ACTUALLY said that Kleck's estimate of 1 million was far too high! He is thus, my friends, a vandal of the worst kind: the kind who sleeps amongst us, pretending he is one of us, when he is no servant of truth at all. He lied and he deserves ostracism, if not the death penalty. Further , I introduced citations from the Harvard School of Public Health that demonstrably refute his overemphasized 20 year old study, as well as a recent study of ALL POLICE Reports nationally, which showed only 1584 defensive gun uses reported in 2014. If his figures are correct, that would mean there are 2 million unreported defensive gun uses for every one the police know about. Please! The study he references in fact says explicitly that the 1 million figure is too high. He supplies no quotation to justify the 33 million figure, which is vandalism. God save this once-great encyclopedia from itself! The end times are nigh! 
== Gaijin42 inserted fake statistics into the Defensive Gun Use article which I tried to remove, since his references have no citation of the 33 million figure. It is wholly invented. He Removed the accurately cited statistics I added ==
<span id="rfu"></span>
<div class="user-block unblock user-unblock-request" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #EBF4FF;">
] '''This user is asking that their ] be reviewed''':
] <span class="plainlinks" style="font-size:88%;">( •  •  • ]<span class="sysop-show"> • ]</span> •  • <span class="sysop-show"> • ] • </span><span class="checkuser-show"> •  ()</span>)</span>
<div style="clear:both;" class=></div>
----
'''Request reason''':
<div style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 2em;">your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)</div>
'''Notes''':
* In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please ''']'''. If no block is listed, then you have been ] by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these ] instead for quick attention by an administrator.
* Please read our ] to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed sysop-show" style="border: none;"><div style="background-color: #D0E4FF; font-weight: bold; text-align: center">
] use only:</div>
<div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align: left;">
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "<span class="monospaced">blocking administrator</span>" with the name of the blocking admin:
:<code>{{Unblock on hold |1=''blocking administrator'' |2=''your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)'' |3 = ~~~~}}</code>
If you '''decline''' the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting <code>{{subst:Decline reason here}}</code> with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a ], explaining why the request was declined.
:<code>{{unblock reviewed |1=''your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)'' |decline = ''{{subst:Decline reason here}}'' ~~~~}}</code>
If you '''accept''' the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting <code>Accept reason here</code> with your rationale:
:<code>{{unblock reviewed |1=''your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)'' |accept = ''accept reason here'' ~~~~}}</code>
</div></div></div>
]
]22:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Friends, I come here to save Misplaced Pages from an evil scourge who goes by the name of Gaijin. His heart is black and he owns more guns than the militaries of several nations, and he only recently ended a 1 year ban for posting in gun control articles. What was the first thing he did? He made up a 33 million figure from a study which ACTUALLY said that Kleck's estimate of 1 million was far too high! He is thus, my friends, a vandal of the worst kind: the kind who sleeps amongst us, pretending he is one of us, when he is no servant of truth at all. He lied and he deserves ostracism, if not the death penalty. Further , I introduced citations from the Harvard School of Public Health that demonstrably refute his overemphasized 20 year old study, as well as a recent study of ALL POLICE Reports nationally, which showed only 1584 defensive gun uses reported in 2014. If his figures are correct, that would mean there are 2 million unreported defensive gun uses for every one the police know about. Please! The study he references in fact says explicitly that the 1 million figure is too high. He supplies no quotation to justify the 33 million figure, which is vandalism. God save this once-great encyclopedia from itself! The end times are nigh! 
== Gaijin42 inserted fake statistics into the Defensive Gun Use article which I tried to remove, since his references have no citation of the 33 million figure. It is wholly invented. He Removed the accurately cited statistics I added ==
<span id="rfu"></span>
<div class="user-block unblock user-unblock-request" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #EBF4FF;">
] '''This user is asking that their ] be reviewed''':
] <span class="plainlinks" style="font-size:88%;">( •  •  • ]<span class="sysop-show"> • ]</span> •  • <span class="sysop-show"> • ] • </span><span class="checkuser-show"> •  ()</span>)</span>
<div style="clear:both;" class=></div>
----
'''Request reason''':
<div style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 2em;">your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)</div>
'''Notes''':
* In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please ''']'''. If no block is listed, then you have been ] by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these ] instead for quick attention by an administrator.
* Please read our ] to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed sysop-show" style="border: none;"><div style="background-color: #D0E4FF; font-weight: bold; text-align: center">
] use only:</div>
<div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align: left;">
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "<span class="monospaced">blocking administrator</span>" with the name of the blocking admin:
:<code>{{Unblock on hold |1=''blocking administrator'' |2=''your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)'' |3 = ~~~~}}</code>
If you '''decline''' the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting <code>{{subst:Decline reason here}}</code> with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a ], explaining why the request was declined.
:<code>{{unblock reviewed |1=''your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)'' |decline = ''{{subst:Decline reason here}}'' ~~~~}}</code>
If you '''accept''' the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting <code>Accept reason here</code> with your rationale:
:<code>{{unblock reviewed |1=''your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)'' |accept = ''accept reason here'' ~~~~}}</code>
</div></div></div>
]
]22:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

. gaijin42's references do not say what he says they say. He is unable to produce a quoted citation showing the 33 million figure. He is making it up. If you want to have an encyclopedia with made up facts, where someone can add a figure of 33 million that they invented and which isn't in the article, please go ahead. But I don't think that's an encyclopedia anymore. As for me, I added a cited , with inline citations reference showing that there are only 1600 verified DGUs yearly. Not only that, Gaijins claim is not logically possible. Any elementary logic shows that what he is claiming is impossible. Think about what you are doing in allowing a vandal like Gaijin to insert fake statistics into articles to suit a political agenda when he has already been topic banned from this area and was just reinstated. He is indeed committing fraud by inserting statistics that aren't in the reference. Also, his reference is 20 years old and is intellectually discredited years ago. You might as well replace the Period Table page with Phlogiston theory. Also, he has been blocked from editing in that area previously likely because he inserts fake statistics into articles. 33 million, or even 1'million, are not logically possible figures. They removed the ACTUALLY VERIFIED FIGURE OF 1600 which I posted with refs and inline citation to suit their own misguided beliefs. You should not allow erroneous information to be posted in an encyclopedia. The reference nowhere says 33 million, and even the 1 million figure is ludicrous.

Regardless, personal attacks to other users is not acceptable. You can disagree and still be civil. --allthefoxes 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Don't you care that a user is getting away with making up statistics and adding them to articles? Isn't that vandalism? There is no citation that says 33 million and he has managed to get it back in there by blocking me. Do you care that your encyclopedia contains intentional falsehoods or not?

The source for the 33 million number has been pointed out to you multiple times. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Defensive_gun_use&diff=prev&oldid=694067709 Gaijin42 (talk) 23:01, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

How about the quotation of the sentence in the article that says 33 million. You send the reference but the reference doesn't say what you say it does. Thus, you are a liar (and a hillbilly.)

The actual, verified figure is 1584 in 2014. You are only off by, oh, say 2 million times, friend.

Sure, I do care, and I'll look into it. Regardless, you were still blocked for personal attacks and harassment. And that's still not okay, even against a vandal. --allthefoxes 23:05, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

By the way, this is what the reference that they claim actually supports their "33 million" figure says: "This paper used survey methods similar to those employed in a recent widely cited study by Kleck and Gertz (1995) and produced comparable results; yet our comparison of estimates based on NSPOF with other sources, together with puzzling inconsistencies in over a third of the defensive gun use (DGU) reports, lead us to conclude that the estimates are far too high. " it does not support 33 million, it actually says the 1 million figure is far ton high. Please think how illogical it is to think that there are 1 million defensive gun uses in the United States, and 1 million violent crimes. This is like claiming "in 200 percent of burglaries, a home alarm prevented the burglary." It DOES NOT MAKE SENSE.TruthIsDivine (talk) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)}} Template:Unblockreason=Your reason here22:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC)}}. gaijin42's references do not say what he says they say. He is unable to produce a quoted citation showing the 33 million figure. He is making it up. If you want to have an encyclopedia with made up facts, where someone can add a figure of 33 million that they invented and which isn't in the article, please go ahead. But I don't think that's an encyclopedia anymore. As for me, I added a cited , with inline citations reference showing that there are only 1600 verified DGUs yearly. Not only that, Gaijins claim is not logically possible. Any elementary logic shows that what he is claiming is impossible. Think about what you are doing in allowing a vandal like Gaijin to insert fake statistics into articles to suit a political agenda when he has already been topic banned from this area and was just reinstated. He is indeed committing fraud by inserting statistics that aren't in the reference. Also, his reference is 20 years old and is intellectually discredited years ago. You might as well replace the Period Table page with Phlogiston theory. Also, he has been blocked from editing in that area previously likely because he inserts fake statistics into articles. 33 million, or even 1'million, are not logically possible figures. They removed the ACTUALLY VERIFIED FIGURE OF 1600 which I posted with refs and inline citation to suit their own misguided beliefs. You should not allow erroneous information to be posted in an encyclopedia. The reference nowhere says 33 million, and even the 1 million figure is ludicrous.

Regardless, personal attacks to other users is not acceptable. You can disagree and still be civil. --allthefoxes 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

How about the quotation of the sentence in the article that says 33 million. You send the reference but the reference doesn't say what you say it does. Thus, you are a liar (and a hillbilly.)

The actual, verified figure is 1584 in 2014. You are only off by, oh, say 2 million times, friend.

Topic ban

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

indefinite topic ban from all edits regarding governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues

You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gun control#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Gamaliel (talk) 23:29, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Category:

Requests for unblock