| Revision as of 07:35, 13 December 2015 editSaff V. (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers12,576 edits →Mass deletion← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:37, 13 December 2015 edit undoFreeatlastChitchat (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,942 edits →Mass deletionNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| ::] You delete the text before add up the discussion. Your faith is very bad and you are bad user that just think to delete. I undone the text and you should not undo until this discussion is open. Say your reasons for references that why is unreliable?] (]) 07:30, 13 December 2015 (UTC) | ::] You delete the text before add up the discussion. Your faith is very bad and you are bad user that just think to delete. I undone the text and you should not undo until this discussion is open. Say your reasons for references that why is unreliable?] (]) 07:30, 13 December 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :::@] they are unreliable because ] says so. The sourcing is laughable to be frank. Regards ] (]) 07:32, 13 December 2015 (UTC) | :::@] they are unreliable because ] says so. The sourcing is laughable to be frank. Regards ] (]) 07:32, 13 December 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ::::] Please examine the references one by one and say your reason for each one.] (]) 07:34, 13 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::::@] They are all "WEBSITES" and "SELFPUBLISHED" books of "NON_NOTABLE" authors. Furthermore the text is not even present in many of the sources. Regards ] (]) 07:37, 13 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:37, 13 December 2015
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 18 November 2015. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Mass deletion
Hey First explain your reason in talk page.Saff V. (talk) 06:49, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
- @User:Saff V. Reasons are UNRELIABLE SOURCING. find better sourcing if you want to put in the info. Reasons for tagging are ,,,,,look at the frigging tag it is self explanatory. Kinda tired of every tom dick and harry who wants to put in unreferenced information from self published sources and then demands an explanation when it is deleted. Regards FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 07:01, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
- Hey You delete the text before add up the discussion. Your faith is very bad and you are bad user that just think to delete. I undone the text and you should not undo until this discussion is open. Say your reasons for references that why is unreliable?Saff V. (talk) 07:30, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
- @User:Saff V. they are unreliable because WP:RS says so. The sourcing is laughable to be frank. Regards FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 07:32, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
- Hey Please examine the references one by one and say your reason for each one.Saff V. (talk) 07:34, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
- @User:Saff V. They are all "WEBSITES" and "SELFPUBLISHED" books of "NON_NOTABLE" authors. Furthermore the text is not even present in many of the sources. Regards FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 07:37, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
- Hey Please examine the references one by one and say your reason for each one.Saff V. (talk) 07:34, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
- @User:Saff V. they are unreliable because WP:RS says so. The sourcing is laughable to be frank. Regards FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 07:32, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
- Hey You delete the text before add up the discussion. Your faith is very bad and you are bad user that just think to delete. I undone the text and you should not undo until this discussion is open. Say your reasons for references that why is unreliable?Saff V. (talk) 07:30, 13 December 2015 (UTC)