| Revision as of 09:14, 18 December 2015 editKatyaan (talk | contribs)539 edits →Blocked as a sockpuppet: Applied for unblock← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:03, 19 December 2015 edit undoJéské Couriano (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers40,090 edits →Blocked as a sockpuppet: This is a Checkuser-based block.Next edit → | ||
| Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
| {{unblock|Hi. First of all, I would like to apologize for not reading the editing guidelines properly. I was under the impression that I could ask for support from editors not only for editing a Wiki page but also for other matters as well. That's why I asked Expertseo to vote. Secondly, I am not not a sockpuppet of any account and never indulged in any sort of vandalism. The admins can verify it by going through my edit history. Rather, I have always tried to contribute to Misplaced Pages in the best possible manner. When I was asked to present my case and others asked me about being a sockpuppet of the above-mentioned account, I declined, because I am not. However, later on, when I went through the guidelines and discussions, I found that because of common edit interests and may be similar IP class, I have been accused of being so. Since I was not aware of these things (sockpuppet), I was not able to present my case properly. Expertseo is a different individual and taught me how to edit on Misplaced Pages. He is no longer active. However, during the article deletion voting process, I asked for his support (I was not aware that it was against the guidelines). I now understand where I went wrong and assure the community that I will not do so in the future. Kindly unblock me so that I can continue with my edits. I have put lots of efforts and time ''(one of the pages that I created was the 19th most viewed page globally)'' and would definitely be a setback for me not being able to contribute further. At one place I read that it is not a punitive action but a preventive one. Since my edit history is not dubious and I believe my contributions have been in the positive direction, I hope that the admins will unblock me as I have learnt the lesson, although the hard way. ] (]) 09:13, 18 December 2015 (UTC)}} | {{unblock|Hi. First of all, I would like to apologize for not reading the editing guidelines properly. I was under the impression that I could ask for support from editors not only for editing a Wiki page but also for other matters as well. That's why I asked Expertseo to vote. Secondly, I am not not a sockpuppet of any account and never indulged in any sort of vandalism. The admins can verify it by going through my edit history. Rather, I have always tried to contribute to Misplaced Pages in the best possible manner. When I was asked to present my case and others asked me about being a sockpuppet of the above-mentioned account, I declined, because I am not. However, later on, when I went through the guidelines and discussions, I found that because of common edit interests and may be similar IP class, I have been accused of being so. Since I was not aware of these things (sockpuppet), I was not able to present my case properly. Expertseo is a different individual and taught me how to edit on Misplaced Pages. He is no longer active. However, during the article deletion voting process, I asked for his support (I was not aware that it was against the guidelines). I now understand where I went wrong and assure the community that I will not do so in the future. Kindly unblock me so that I can continue with my edits. I have put lots of efforts and time ''(one of the pages that I created was the 19th most viewed page globally)'' and would definitely be a setback for me not being able to contribute further. At one place I read that it is not a punitive action but a preventive one. Since my edit history is not dubious and I believe my contributions have been in the positive direction, I hope that the admins will unblock me as I have learnt the lesson, although the hard way. ] (]) 09:13, 18 December 2015 (UTC)}} | ||
| :] This block can only be reviewed by another CU. —<font color="228B22">] ]</font> <sup><small>]</small></sup> 18:03, 19 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:03, 19 December 2015
Welcome!
|
if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the June 2014
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Deepender Singh Hooda has been reverted.
Your edit here to Deepender Singh Hooda was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/DeependerSHooda) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Misplaced Pages. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Misplaced Pages's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:02, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
You are invited to to WikiProject India
 | Namaste! Katyaan,
On behalf of WikiProject India, I am inviting you to join our WikiProject. To see what is happening now in WikiProject India, follow our noticeboard. If you are not a member already, you can add your name here. If are already a member, disregard this message. Thank you. — CutestPenguin 15:57, 7 October 2014 (UTC) |
November 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to BatchMaster Software may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- with a full suite of process manufacturing modules, and a change of database to BtrieveTM (later Pervasive<sup>TM</sup>.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:55, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Arun Subhashchandra Yadav may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- | relatives = Sachin Yadav (Brother))
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:33, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Good work Amit098 (talk) 07:39, 9 December 2014 (UTC) |
- @Amit098: Thank you!
December 2014
Your recent edit to Comparison of project management software appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Misplaced Pages's notability guideline. Thank you. — Rhododendrites \\ 05:48, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Your minor edits are helpful!
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| This is for your work on Madhya Pradesh related articles Expertseo (talk) 08:54, 17 December 2014 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for July 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vyapam scam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ghaziabad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Notice
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Meat_puppetry. Thank you. The Avengers 11:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Expertseo (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Misplaced Pages policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Misplaced Pages; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. — Berean Hunter (talk) 13:48, 4 December 2015 (UTC) |
Katyaan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi. First of all, I would like to apologize for not reading the editing guidelines properly. I was under the impression that I could ask for support from editors not only for editing a Wiki page but also for other matters as well. That's why I asked Expertseo to vote. Secondly, I am not not a sockpuppet of any account and never indulged in any sort of vandalism. The admins can verify it by going through my edit history. Rather, I have always tried to contribute to Misplaced Pages in the best possible manner. When I was asked to present my case and others asked me about being a sockpuppet of the above-mentioned account, I declined, because I am not. However, later on, when I went through the guidelines and discussions, I found that because of common edit interests and may be similar IP class, I have been accused of being so. Since I was not aware of these things (sockpuppet), I was not able to present my case properly. Expertseo is a different individual and taught me how to edit on Misplaced Pages. He is no longer active. However, during the article deletion voting process, I asked for his support (I was not aware that it was against the guidelines). I now understand where I went wrong and assure the community that I will not do so in the future. Kindly unblock me so that I can continue with my edits. I have put lots of efforts and time (one of the pages that I created was the 19th most viewed page globally) and would definitely be a setback for me not being able to contribute further. At one place I read that it is not a punitive action but a preventive one. Since my edit history is not dubious and I believe my contributions have been in the positive direction, I hope that the admins will unblock me as I have learnt the lesson, although the hard way. Katyaan (talk) 09:13, 18 December 2015 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hi. First of all, I would like to apologize for not reading the editing guidelines properly. I was under the impression that I could ask for support from editors not only for editing a Wiki page but also for other matters as well. That's why I asked Expertseo to vote. Secondly, I am not not a sockpuppet of any account and never indulged in any sort of vandalism. The admins can verify it by going through my edit history. Rather, I have always tried to contribute to Misplaced Pages in the best possible manner. When I was asked to present my case and others asked me about being a sockpuppet of the above-mentioned account, I declined, because I am not. However, later on, when I went through the guidelines and discussions, I found that because of common edit interests and may be similar IP class, I have been accused of being so. Since I was not aware of these things (sockpuppet), I was not able to present my case properly. Expertseo is a different individual and taught me how to edit on Misplaced Pages. He is no longer active. However, during the article deletion voting process, I asked for his support (I was not aware that it was against the guidelines). I now understand where I went wrong and assure the community that I will not do so in the future. Kindly unblock me so that I can continue with my edits. I have put lots of efforts and time ''(one of the pages that I created was the 19th most viewed page globally)'' and would definitely be a setback for me not being able to contribute further. At one place I read that it is not a punitive action but a preventive one. Since my edit history is not dubious and I believe my contributions have been in the positive direction, I hope that the admins will unblock me as I have learnt the lesson, although the hard way. ] (]) 09:13, 18 December 2015 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi. First of all, I would like to apologize for not reading the editing guidelines properly. I was under the impression that I could ask for support from editors not only for editing a Wiki page but also for other matters as well. That's why I asked Expertseo to vote. Secondly, I am not not a sockpuppet of any account and never indulged in any sort of vandalism. The admins can verify it by going through my edit history. Rather, I have always tried to contribute to Misplaced Pages in the best possible manner. When I was asked to present my case and others asked me about being a sockpuppet of the above-mentioned account, I declined, because I am not. However, later on, when I went through the guidelines and discussions, I found that because of common edit interests and may be similar IP class, I have been accused of being so. Since I was not aware of these things (sockpuppet), I was not able to present my case properly. Expertseo is a different individual and taught me how to edit on Misplaced Pages. He is no longer active. However, during the article deletion voting process, I asked for his support (I was not aware that it was against the guidelines). I now understand where I went wrong and assure the community that I will not do so in the future. Kindly unblock me so that I can continue with my edits. I have put lots of efforts and time ''(one of the pages that I created was the 19th most viewed page globally)'' and would definitely be a setback for me not being able to contribute further. At one place I read that it is not a punitive action but a preventive one. Since my edit history is not dubious and I believe my contributions have been in the positive direction, I hope that the admins will unblock me as I have learnt the lesson, although the hard way. ] (]) 09:13, 18 December 2015 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi. First of all, I would like to apologize for not reading the editing guidelines properly. I was under the impression that I could ask for support from editors not only for editing a Wiki page but also for other matters as well. That's why I asked Expertseo to vote. Secondly, I am not not a sockpuppet of any account and never indulged in any sort of vandalism. The admins can verify it by going through my edit history. Rather, I have always tried to contribute to Misplaced Pages in the best possible manner. When I was asked to present my case and others asked me about being a sockpuppet of the above-mentioned account, I declined, because I am not. However, later on, when I went through the guidelines and discussions, I found that because of common edit interests and may be similar IP class, I have been accused of being so. Since I was not aware of these things (sockpuppet), I was not able to present my case properly. Expertseo is a different individual and taught me how to edit on Misplaced Pages. He is no longer active. However, during the article deletion voting process, I asked for his support (I was not aware that it was against the guidelines). I now understand where I went wrong and assure the community that I will not do so in the future. Kindly unblock me so that I can continue with my edits. I have put lots of efforts and time ''(one of the pages that I created was the 19th most viewed page globally)'' and would definitely be a setback for me not being able to contribute further. At one place I read that it is not a punitive action but a preventive one. Since my edit history is not dubious and I believe my contributions have been in the positive direction, I hope that the admins will unblock me as I have learnt the lesson, although the hard way. ] (]) 09:13, 18 December 2015 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
- Checkuser indicates that there is a technical match between you and Expertseo. This block can only be reviewed by another CU. —Jeremy v^_^v 18:03, 19 December 2015 (UTC)