Revision as of 06:27, 9 January 2016 editDennis Bratland (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users61,245 edits →January 2016: also, stop WP:HOUNDING← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:31, 9 January 2016 edit undoDennis Bratland (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users61,245 edits Caution: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on Honda SS125A. (TW)Next edit → | ||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
* Also, it's obvious that you are ] me. You are monitorinig my edits, and following me around to revert my edits and criticize me on talk pages. You did this at ], and at AN/I, and at ]. This behavior is a violation of the ] policy and it can result in you being blocked from editing. --] (]) | * Also, it's obvious that you are ] me. You are monitorinig my edits, and following me around to revert my edits and criticize me on talk pages. You did this at ], and at AN/I, and at ]. This behavior is a violation of the ] policy and it can result in you being blocked from editing. --] (]) | ||
] Please do not add or change content, as you did at ], without citing a ]. Please review the guidelines at ] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''<P>Please stop trying to pursue personal grudges. Building an encyclopedia requires the boring work of going an looking up facts and citing them. Edit warring because you have a grudge is using Misplaced Pages as a ]. Please stop.<P>''<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> ] (]) 06:31, 9 January 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:31, 9 January 2016
Zachlita, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi Zachlita! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC) |
Civility
Hello, I'm Brianhe. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Dodge Tomahawk that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Misplaced Pages is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Please don't describe other editors' contributions as "stupid comment" as you did here. - Brianhe (talk) 21:01, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Are you joking?
You said my edit was not civil, but it was the summary you were talking about not the edit. Dont remove my edit because you dont like the summary.Zachlita (talk) 21:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not joking. All of your communication on Misplaced Pages is part of the record, including edit summaries. It was the incivility of your edit summary that caught my attention, as much as the actual deletion of content which is also problematic. Are you willing to engage in a polite, consensus-based community process? If not, your contributions here will be of limited value. You might want to review WP:PILLARS; civility is one of the five core principles here and is non-negotiable. - Brianhe (talk) 21:34, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
First time you said to me you changed my edit cos I was rude. Now you change your mind? ive edited wikipedia before i know about discussion and dont appreciate your condescending tone. i didnt call anyone stupid. I called their edit stupid. criticize the edit not the editor. if you wanna talk consensus look at the article, there are a million editors saying remove the stupid speed stuff and maybe 1 or 2 saying dont. follow the consensus.Zachlita (talk) 21:40, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- You're still saying "stupid" in this very conversation when referring to other editors' contributions. That is not civil. Please stop it. There are other ways to disagree with content, without disparaging. - Brianhe (talk) 22:05, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
we have different views on what is uncivil. i dont mind the word stupid at all. but if its important to you, i will find a less offensive word - maybe 'poorly judged comment' gives the same feeling without the rudeness dont you think? Zachlita (talk) 22:10, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- This would not be seen as constructive or civil by anyone. Again, please try to approach this with a collaborative attitude. Dennis is one of the core members of WP:WikiProject Motorcycling, has been credited for two Good Articles in that area, so he knows what he's talking about. Don't you think he deserves more respect for his contributions and perspective. – Brianhe (talk) 05:19, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) @Brianhe: you might like to consider the views expressed at this admin's user page section.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 10:07, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 24 December
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Dodge Tomahawk page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
fastest bike
I'm not sure if the Ducati you listed as the fastest production bike, qualifies as a stock or modified bike or not. But, I doubt it can qualify as street legal, based on the sources you gave, that clearly state that the top speed of 200mph+ was achieved with a track only exhaust. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 07:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
ok i did not see that Zachlita (talk) 03:38, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
January 2016
Hello, I'm Dennis Bratland. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Blackcatmotorcycles that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Misplaced Pages is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dennis Bratland (talk) 06:23, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Also, it's obvious that you are WP:HOUNDING me. You are monitorinig my edits, and following me around to revert my edits and criticize me on talk pages. You did this at Dodge Tomahawk, and at AN/I, and at Harley-Davidson XR-750. This behavior is a violation of the harassment policy and it can result in you being blocked from editing. --Dennis Bratland (talk)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Honda SS125A, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.
Please stop trying to pursue personal grudges. Building an encyclopedia requires the boring work of going an looking up facts and citing them. Edit warring because you have a grudge is using Misplaced Pages as a WP:BATTLEGROUND. Please stop.