Revision as of 03:20, 22 January 2016 editGhost of hugh glass (talk | contribs)303 edits →WP:Identifying reliable sources← Previous edit |
Revision as of 03:35, 22 January 2016 edit undoPeterTheFourth (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,071 edits →3RR violation: new sectionNext edit → |
Line 71: |
Line 71: |
|
Maybe you think opinion columns in right-wing and left-wing media are reliable sources. They're not. Padding ] with "sources" that don't satisfy Misplaced Pages's sourcing guidelines doesn't help to establish the phrase's notability. — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 02:12, 22 January 2016 (UTC) |
|
Maybe you think opinion columns in right-wing and left-wing media are reliable sources. They're not. Padding ] with "sources" that don't satisfy Misplaced Pages's sourcing guidelines doesn't help to establish the phrase's notability. — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 02:12, 22 January 2016 (UTC) |
|
:You seem to be ]. Perhaps you should disengage from the topic area, at least until such time as you can be objective. I'd hate to see you be sanctioned. ] (]) 03:20, 22 January 2016 (UTC) |
|
:You seem to be ]. Perhaps you should disengage from the topic area, at least until such time as you can be objective. I'd hate to see you be sanctioned. ] (]) 03:20, 22 January 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== 3RR violation == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi! In your revert of the addition of some tags of possibly unreliable sources , you crossed to your fourth revert within 24 hours on the ] article. Rather than the dealing with the edit warring noticeboard which would probably just recommend a self-revert, I'd like to ask you directly- would you please self revert? ] (]) 03:35, 22 January 2016 (UTC) |
Maybe you think opinion columns in right-wing and left-wing media are reliable sources. They're not. Padding Social Justice Warrior with "sources" that don't satisfy Misplaced Pages's sourcing guidelines doesn't help to establish the phrase's notability. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 02:12, 22 January 2016 (UTC)