Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Misplaced Pages.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
This category was nominated for deletion on 7 October 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.
This category was nominated for renaming on 10 June 2011. The result of the discussion was keep.
Possible move
To be consistent with the Misplaced Pages article humour, would not a move to ] be appropriate. Mintguy(T)
Perhaps better would be to switch the humour article back to humor, where the article started (it was changed, in violation of WP guidelines, some time ago). --Cultural Freedomtalk 2007-08-28 21:01 21:01, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
I think we should, it's disambiguating, and it is humor. It's just a link. Go to image and there's a link to Misplaced Pages:image. Let's just put it in; it's not a paper encyclopedia, so there's no space requirement, and after all, it's just a link. --HereToHelp (talk) 02:49, 6 December 2005 (UTC)