User talk:CometEncke: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 13:50, 13 February 2016 editCometEncke (talk \| contribs)380 edits illustration← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:50, 18 February 2016 edit undoKhirurg (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,689 edits →February 2016: new sectionTag: contentious topics alert Next edit →
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::: Amazingly, this question came not from the numerous Western hot-button topics which I edit, but rather from my look at an unrelated ANI thread. An excellent summary of the tactic of which the above question is a part can be found here: ] (]) 13:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)		::: Amazingly, this question came not from the numerous Western hot-button topics which I edit, but rather from my look at an unrelated ANI thread. An excellent summary of the tactic of which the above question is a part can be found here: ] (]) 13:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
	<br />		<br />

			== February 2016 ==

			{{Ivm\|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''

			'''Please carefully read this information:'''

			The Arbitration Committee has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding , a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ].

			Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
			}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->

			I also find it kind of interesting how you are even aware of this warning template, for a two-month old account that has never edited eastern european topics before. Can you explain? Because it does look a little strange, know what I mean? ] (]) 17:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:50, 18 February 2016

File:Tunguska.png

Trees knocked over by the Tunguska blast. Photograph from the Soviet Academy of Science 1927 expedition led by Leonid Kulik

No, not this user, just proof of a warped sense of humour and a desire to keep the page visually interesting

The Tunguska event of 1908, probably caused by the impact of a cometary body, has also been postulated by Czechoslovakian astronomer Ľubor Kresák as a fragment of Comet Encke.

Kresak, L'. (1978). "The Tunguska object - A fragment of Comet Encke". Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia. 29. Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia: 129. Bibcode:1978BAICz..29..129K.

A sock?

By the way, your account was just created on 27 December 2015 but you don't sound like a new user; do I know you? STSC (talk) 17:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Are you presenting any evidence? Or are you just presenting a hanging question? If the latter, why? And is the sudden concern perchance related to the ANI thread that Citobun started and to which I contributed repeatedly? and other diffs? Prior to stumbling across this ANI thread, has my account shown the slightest interest in Hong Kong politics? CometEncke (talk) 02:55, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your account is only 6 weeks old but obviously you're not a newcomer. Whatever I don't have the time to investigate so I'd just leave it. Happy Lunar New Year to you. STSC (talk) 04:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Amazingly, this question came not from the numerous Western hot-button topics which I edit, but rather from my look at an unrelated ANI thread. An excellent summary of the tactic of which the above question is a part can be found here: CometEncke (talk) 13:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding , a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33

I also find it kind of interesting how you are even aware of this warning template, for a two-month old account that has never edited eastern european topics before. Can you explain? Because it does look a little strange, know what I mean? Athenean (talk) 17:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)