| Revision as of 10:14, 12 August 2006 editAmists (talk | contribs)518 edits →Anti islam comments by []← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:48, 20 August 2006 edit undoShiva's Trident (talk | contribs)2,622 edits →Anti islam comments by []: irrelevantNext edit → | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| This article should not be merged. Many people want to have a term that they can link to regarding terrorist organizations and their beliefs. Islamism is not a preferred term for many Muslims on this site. We need to have differentiation in order to avoid heated termonology. | This article should not be merged. Many people want to have a term that they can link to regarding terrorist organizations and their beliefs. Islamism is not a preferred term for many Muslims on this site. We need to have differentiation in order to avoid heated termonology. | ||
| ==Anti islam comments by ]== | |||
| Please check ] 's anti islam comments on my talk page. and here. | |||
| Synopsis- "There is only one kind of Islam. The kind that blows things up" and " I'm not upset about fundamentalism in Islam because there is no fundamentalism in Islam. Islam ITSELF is 'fundamentalist', in the sense of Intolerance, Slaughter, Looting, Arson, Molestation of women, ie I-S-L-A-M." | |||
| ] 20:50, 26 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| " | |||
| rejection of the equality of men and women (i.e. they are unequal in specific aspects like how they think and act but are still equal overall) | |||
| " | |||
| This sentence doesnt make sense, I want to change it for the sake of clarification. Is this supposed to be a declarative statement? Or a descriptive one about Islam? either way it is confusing. | |||
| --] 10:14, 12 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:48, 20 August 2006
Followed RK's advice and split this off as a stub article. -- Chris Q 07:31 Feb 6, 2003 (UTC)
Moved here, since I think that liberal Muslims also believe everything up until the last sentence.
- For religious fundamentalists of any faith, scripture must be adhered to without exception. Conservative Muslims see the Islamic sacred texts this way. Fundamentalists claim that the divine will is expressed in the Qur'an and Hadith in a perfect form applicable to all times and places; and that Muslims have a reliable record of that revelation, which cannot be questioned. Conservatives believe that no one has the right to disagree with or modify the the Quran, since it is the word of God. Fundamentalists would generally claim that their views represent is the purest form of Islam in that it adheres most closely to its 'fundamental' religious
There is a lot of inaccuracy in this article. For example, although I have now changed it, Imam Abdul-Wahab followed the Hanbali school of thought. He certainly did not reject the schools of thought.
Furthermore, the vast majority of Muslims, according to this article, are "fundamentalist". What Westerners see as a "fundamentalist" is more likened to an extremist. In Christianity, the two have become blended together, but most Muslims are fundamentalist in that they believe in literal interpretation of the Qur'an and Hadith and believe in the Qur'an as the literal word of God. YusufMJH
This article sucks. Calling all editors...Timothy Usher 10:18, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Merge with Islamism
OK well I've worked on this a bit and stripped out some of the most egregious crap (like European Human Right Court calls Islam incompatible w/democracy -I doubt it) -but as I've come across numerous sources which equate "Islamic fundamentalism" with "Islamism", I really don't see the point. We should just merge the two articles. Armon 12:35, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Merge! Though distinct phenomena, they are most easilsy understood when dealt with together. See my longish contribution at the Islamism talk page (towards the bottom of the section) for my reason why I think this is so. Azate 00:23, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
minor change to preserve npov
I have made a very minor change in the Social and Political Goals section to avoid the assertion that "leftist ideologies" and "Arab Nationalism" are in fact discredited (I care not one whit whether anyone believes they are or are not but it's not consistent with neutral point of view to maintain they are while there is rational dispute).
Don't Merge
This article should not be merged. Many people want to have a term that they can link to regarding terrorist organizations and their beliefs. Islamism is not a preferred term for many Muslims on this site. We need to have differentiation in order to avoid heated termonology.