Misplaced Pages

User talk:Keyne: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:06, 9 August 2006 editSandyGeorgia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors278,958 edits AS again← Previous edit Revision as of 18:27, 20 August 2006 edit undoA Kiwi (talk | contribs)1,189 edits →ASNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:
==AS== ==AS==
Not sure why an anon is insisting on adding Wrong Planet to the external links on ], when it's already listed under See also, but all the editors might have to decide how to best handle this. I've long thought a new, and more comprehensive, template might solve a lot of these issues. ] 22:06, 9 August 2006 (UTC) Not sure why an anon is insisting on adding Wrong Planet to the external links on ], when it's already listed under See also, but all the editors might have to decide how to best handle this. I've long thought a new, and more comprehensive, template might solve a lot of these issues. ] 22:06, 9 August 2006 (UTC)


Excellent comment today on AS Talk page ]. I have been saddened to see the recent encouragement of mud-slinging and think your take on things is wonderfully appropriate. Thanks for the redirection of energies you have suggested. ]--Kiwi 18:27, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:27, 20 August 2006

Congratulations

Keyne, this barnstar is in recognition of your excellent talk page contributions, cool head under the pressure of FARC review, and diligent work in restoring Asperger syndrome to featured article status. Congratulations on a job well done! Sandy 09:02, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

AS

Not sure why an anon is insisting on adding Wrong Planet to the external links on Asperger syndrome, when it's already listed under See also, but all the editors might have to decide how to best handle this. I've long thought a new, and more comprehensive, template might solve a lot of these issues. Sandy 22:06, 9 August 2006 (UTC)


Excellent comment today on AS Talk page Asperger Syndrome. I have been saddened to see the recent encouragement of mud-slinging and think your take on things is wonderfully appropriate. Thanks for the redirection of energies you have suggested. Kiwi--Kiwi 18:27, 20 August 2006 (UTC)