Revision as of 20:31, 19 March 2016 editSPACKlick (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,193 edits →Repeated inclusion of forum page about Beckie: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:31, 19 March 2016 edit undoSPACKlick (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,193 edits →Repeated inclusion of forum page about BeckieNext edit → | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== Repeated inclusion of forum page about Beckie == | == Repeated inclusion of forum page about Beckie == | ||
There seems to be no |
There seems to be no encyclopedic reason to include a link to a discussion forum, any reason for it to stay? ] (]) 20:31, 19 March 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:31, 19 March 2016
Biography Stub‑class | ||||||||||
|
Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... ( clicked publish too early, the full article will be fleshed out and fully sourced) --Sam Dufus (talk) 10:30, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Alright, still a stub for now, but looking okay. probably shoulda drafted it first, still got more to add. Thanks though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sam Dufus (talk • contribs) 23:56, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Alright so it has a week per WP:BLPPROD Ok, I hope to lay out at least 1000 words by then if I can find the sourcing. Even though I think she still passes for notability with being one of if not the most public persons with trichotillomania & having a quarter of a million subscribers in total. I understand if the sourcing is lacking it should go. And PamD mentioned she should be described as British not English? Is there a specific Wiki style guide for that?Sam Dufus (talk) 04:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Repeated inclusion of forum page about Beckie
There seems to be no encyclopedic reason to include a link to a discussion forum, any reason for it to stay? SPACKlick (talk) 20:31, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Categories: