Revision as of 22:49, 19 March 2016 editZoupan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users66,156 edits have you read any of the references?← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:50, 19 March 2016 edit undoZoupan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users66,156 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''Partition of Syria''' is a ] to end the ]. It would mean the division of the country along sectarian (religious) and ethnic lines.<ref name=GRI>{{cite web|url=http://globalriskinsights.com/2016/02/is-partitioning-syria-a-viable-option/|title=Is partitioning Syria a viable option?|publisher=Global Risk Insights}}</ref> The war is viewed of as largely a sectarian conflict.<ref name=GRI/> ], the United States, Israel, and other ] representatives have suggested the idea of "federal division" (an effort deemed "]"<ref>{{cite web|title=US, Israel Consider 'Balkanization' of Syria: Coalition Source|publisher=Syrian Observer|url=http://syrianobserver.com/EN/News/29485/US_Israel_Consider_Balkanization_of_Syria_Coalition_Source}}</ref>).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/03/syria-civil-war-key-powers-federal-division-160311072916545.html|date=March 2016|title=Syria civil war: Key powers 'consider federal division'|publisher=Al Jazeera}}</ref> President ] has not ruled out the possibility of a federal democratic state of Syria. The ], however, has rejected the offer during negotiations. | The '''Partition of Syria''' is a ] to end the ]. It would mean the division of the country along sectarian (religious) and ethnic lines.<ref name=GRI>{{cite web|url=http://globalriskinsights.com/2016/02/is-partitioning-syria-a-viable-option/|title=Is partitioning Syria a viable option?|publisher=Global Risk Insights}}</ref> The war is viewed of as largely a sectarian conflict.<ref name=GRI/> ], the United States, Israel, and other ] representatives have suggested the idea of "federal division" (an effort deemed "]"<ref>{{cite web|title=US, Israel Consider 'Balkanization' of Syria: Coalition Source|publisher=Syrian Observer|url=http://syrianobserver.com/EN/News/29485/US_Israel_Consider_Balkanization_of_Syria_Coalition_Source}}</ref>).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/03/syria-civil-war-key-powers-federal-division-160311072916545.html|date=March 2016|title=Syria civil war: Key powers 'consider federal division'|publisher=Al Jazeera}}</ref> President ] has not ruled out the possibility of a federal democratic state of Syria. The ], however, has rejected the offer during negotiations. | ||
], "Syrian Kurdistan", was declared ] on 17 March 2016.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-35830375}}</ref> | ], "Syrian Kurdistan", was declared ] on 17 March 2016, which was dismissed by the Syrian government.<ref>{{cite web|title=Syria conflict: Kurds declare federal system|year=2016|publisher=BBC|url=http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-35830375}}</ref> | ||
==See also== | ==See also== |
Revision as of 22:50, 19 March 2016
The Partition of Syria is a scenario to end the Syrian Civil War. It would mean the division of the country along sectarian (religious) and ethnic lines. The war is viewed of as largely a sectarian conflict. Russia, the United States, Israel, and other UN representatives have suggested the idea of "federal division" (an effort deemed "Balkanization"). President Bashar al-Assad has not ruled out the possibility of a federal democratic state of Syria. The opposition, however, has rejected the offer during negotiations.
Rojava, "Syrian Kurdistan", was declared an autonomous federation on 17 March 2016, which was dismissed by the Syrian government.
See also
References
- ^ "Is partitioning Syria a viable option?". Global Risk Insights.
- "US, Israel Consider 'Balkanization' of Syria: Coalition Source". Syrian Observer.
- "Syria civil war: Key powers 'consider federal division'". Al Jazeera. March 2016.
- "Syria conflict: Kurds declare federal system". BBC. 2016.
This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please help improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (March 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
External links
- "Partition: It's time to recognise reality in Syria". USAPP. 2015-10-03.
- Michael O'Hanlon (3 September 2015). "How will Syria's war end? Other civil wars suggest an answer". Washington Post.