| Revision as of 04:50, 23 August 2006 editDaphne A (talk | contribs)402 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:06, 23 August 2006 edit undoDaphne A (talk | contribs)402 edits on unsourced materialNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| Regarding the title of this article: the study was done by the Gillberg group, and it was not initially (or ever entirely) about DAMP; so the original title is more appropriate. I ask that the title not be changed without having some discussion first. —] 04:50, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | Regarding the title of this article: the study was done by the Gillberg group, and it was not initially (or ever entirely) about DAMP; so the original title is more appropriate. I ask that the title not be changed without having some discussion first. —] 04:50, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Some of the material that I removed from the start of the article was good material, which it would be nice to include. The problem was that there were no sources. —] 05:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:06, 23 August 2006
This article arose from a section of the article on Christopher Gillberg. There was a long discussion about the section in that article. —Daphne A 10:37, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- I'm glad you finally put it in a separate article :-)
- Fred-Chess 21:52, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, I just hadn't thought of it until you recommended it. —Daphne A 04:50, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Regarding the title of this article: the study was done by the Gillberg group, and it was not initially (or ever entirely) about DAMP; so the original title is more appropriate. I ask that the title not be changed without having some discussion first. —Daphne A 04:50, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Some of the material that I removed from the start of the article was good material, which it would be nice to include. The problem was that there were no sources. —Daphne A 05:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)