| Revision as of 19:27, 4 June 2016 editKautilya3 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers86,369 edits Comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:50, 4 June 2016 edit undoBishonen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators80,267 edits Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanctionNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| I should also warn you against spamming about ] at unrelated pages like ]. Every article has its own talk page, which is meant for discussing the content of that particular page. Please respect that. -- ] (]) 19:27, 4 June 2016 (UTC) | I should also warn you against spamming about ] at unrelated pages like ]. Every article has its own talk page, which is meant for discussing the content of that particular page. Please respect that. -- ] (]) 19:27, 4 June 2016 (UTC) | ||
| ==Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction== | |||
| {{Ivmbox | |||
| |2=Commons-emblem-hand.svg | |||
| |imagesize=50px | |||
| |1=The following sanction now applies to you: | |||
| {{Talkquote|1=You have been topic banned for one month from editing ] and all related pages. Please click on the link ] to see what "topic banned" means.}} | |||
| You have been sanctioned for spamming ] as well as user talkpages with the same edit request, which has already been answered many times. The last straw is your posting the same request on a random article talkpage (]). | |||
| This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an ] under the authority of the ]'s decision at ] and, if applicable, the procedure described at ]. This sanction has been recorded in the ]. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the ] to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be ] for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions. | |||
| You may appeal this sanction using the process described ]. I recommend that you use the ] if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.<!-- Template:AE sanction.--> ] | ] 19:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| }} | |||
Revision as of 19:50, 4 June 2016
May 2016
Hi, Giridharmurthy100, welcome to Misplaced Pages. Please stop putting unsourced editing requests on Talk:Kapu (caste) and try to take on board what experienced editors tell you about Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Don't attack them when they do, as you did here. Discuss civilly. If you have no interest in our policies, as you imply here, you'll probably be happier contributing to a different type of site. Bishonen | talk 17:52, 31 May 2016 (UTC).
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.The above issued because you have just yet again repeated the same pointless edit request. Enough is enough. - Sitush (talk) 02:51, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
June 2016
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Patel. This contravenes Misplaced Pages's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Sundayclose (talk) 16:56, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Canvassing people to do edits on your behalf (, ) isn't going to do you any favours. As has been explained to you before, you need to get consensus on the article talk page. Furthermore, a news report from 2009 cannot possibly verify a statement relating to 2016 - this was pointless. - Sitush (talk) 11:32, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
I should also warn you against spamming about Kapu (caste) at unrelated pages like Talk: Patel. Every article has its own talk page, which is meant for discussing the content of that particular page. Please respect that. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 19:27, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction
The following sanction now applies to you:
You have been topic banned for one month from editing Kapu (caste) and all related pages. Please click on the link Topic ban to see what "topic banned" means.
You have been sanctioned for spamming Talk:Kapu (caste) as well as user talkpages with the same edit request, which has already been answered many times. The last straw is your posting the same request on a random article talkpage (Talk:Patel).
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | talk 19:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)