| Revision as of 10:30, 24 May 2016 editDPL bot (talk | contribs)Bots668,525 edits dablink notification message (see the FAQ)← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:15, 27 June 2016 edit undoLadislav Mecir (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,014 edits →Disambiguation link notification for May 24: edit warning noticeNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:30, 24 May 2016 (UTC) | It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:30, 24 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
| ==Edit warring at ]== | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 13:15, 27 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:15, 27 June 2016
Hello
Please go to whatever page you are wondering about and hold the discussion there.
Michelle Goldberg
The subject of your recent edit The Zeitgeist Movement is discussed on the RS Notice Board. Grammar'sLittleHelper (talk) 06:51, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Zeitgeist Movement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Social engineer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Zeitgeist Movement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Social engineer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Decentralized autonomous organization
An article that you have been involved in editing—Decentralized autonomous organization—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 17:45, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ethereum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hacker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Edit warring at Bitcoin
Your recent editing history at Bitcoin shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ladislav Mecir (talk) 13:15, 27 June 2016 (UTC)