Revision as of 03:18, 30 August 2006 editAzskeptic (talk | contribs)126 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:30, 30 August 2006 edit undoDrMacrophage (talk | contribs)313 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
You are not in a position to demand anything other than proper citations and the state sites from Texas,California, Indiana, Kansas, Oregon, and others are legitimate items which should be available in Wikepedia. If you insist on not allowing input you will end up getting banned. ] 03:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC) | You are not in a position to demand anything other than proper citations and the state sites from Texas,California, Indiana, Kansas, Oregon, and others are legitimate items which should be available in Wikepedia. If you insist on not allowing input you will end up getting banned. ] 03:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
To Dean: As a current student at UHSA, and creator of this article, yes, I'm in a position to oversee what is posted. CA only approved a handful of medical schools in the world. Now you tell me, is it legitimate to defame other non-approved schools by calling them inferior? Three years back, schools like Ross and AUC were also banned, does that mean they are bad schools? If you insist on vandalizing this article (and other articles), you might end up getting banned – and even dragged to court for personal damages. ] | |||
'''To Robo doc:''' I am a student at that university which means I have first hand experience, and it is you who must prove what you claim. You must prove things true to add them. Not add them, and then demand them to be proven false to be removed. And this has nothing to do with spamming the article with external links. ] | '''To Robo doc:''' I am a student at that university which means I have first hand experience, and it is you who must prove what you claim. You must prove things true to add them. Not add them, and then demand them to be proven false to be removed. And this has nothing to do with spamming the article with external links. ] |
Revision as of 04:30, 30 August 2006
To Dean: Wrong. While it is true that UHSA graduates are having licensing problems in some US states (which IMG doesn't?), it has nothing to do with the teaching at UHSA, but with bad students (a major problem among foreign schools) that got admitted to the school only with the intention of appending the M.D. to their names and not get officially and fully licensed. Nevertheless, the good students have been licensed physicians in various US states, and its medical program has been approved by many boards. Most of its faculty are American trained and clinicals are held in US hospitals. Additionally, I’m open to any type of discussion and changes in this UHSA article only if Robo doc (or you) provide valid qualifications that put you in a position to contribute to this article in an intelligent way – instead of posting links to a bunch of websites and providing conflicting remarks to my post. Apparently, neither you nor robo doc are qualified to post here. It is also apparent (from your contributions) that you are a member of Misplaced Pages for the sole purpose of defaming foreign medical schools. And yes, I have reported Robo md, who registered only for posting in this article. DrGladwin
You are not in a position to demand anything other than proper citations and the state sites from Texas,California, Indiana, Kansas, Oregon, and others are legitimate items which should be available in Wikepedia. If you insist on not allowing input you will end up getting banned. Azskeptic 03:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
To Dean: As a current student at UHSA, and creator of this article, yes, I'm in a position to oversee what is posted. CA only approved a handful of medical schools in the world. Now you tell me, is it legitimate to defame other non-approved schools by calling them inferior? Three years back, schools like Ross and AUC were also banned, does that mean they are bad schools? If you insist on vandalizing this article (and other articles), you might end up getting banned – and even dragged to court for personal damages. DrGladwin
To Robo doc: I am a student at that university which means I have first hand experience, and it is you who must prove what you claim. You must prove things true to add them. Not add them, and then demand them to be proven false to be removed. And this has nothing to do with spamming the article with external links. DrGladwin
To Gladwin: Let me see if I understand. I post legitimate links to states that may question aspects of a given school or schools and I need to prove them true? It´s in the public domain, it´s not my job to prove them true, it´s up to the university (UHSA) to prove them un-true. UHSA can start by suing the State of Texas its their list, not mine, you don´t see me with a list, do you? Since when does an individual need to be "qualified" to post "here"? Where does one earn or buy such credentials? Intelligence is not an objective qualification for posting either, but you knew that right? Robo doc 03:14, 30 August 2006 (UTC)