Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jerm: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:18, 9 September 2016 editJerm (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,667 edits clearing/archiving← Previous edit Revision as of 01:33, 9 September 2016 edit undo66.38.71.69 (talk) Edits: new sectionNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talkheader}} {{talkheader}}
{{busy|image=Diamond-caution.svg}} {{busy|image=Diamond-caution.svg}}

== Edits ==

It is a disputable idea that Creation is a narrative. There are many great scientists that would conclude that the Creation account seems most accurate for the findings they have from the material in which they have studied that have lead them to their conclusions. It is merely speculation to define it as a narrative or as a myth. If you define the information as an "account" rather than a "myth" validity is restored to centrism and gives proper balance to any biased belief that may be expressed by an editor.

Thank you.

Revision as of 01:33, 9 September 2016

This is Jerm's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Edits

It is a disputable idea that Creation is a narrative. There are many great scientists that would conclude that the Creation account seems most accurate for the findings they have from the material in which they have studied that have lead them to their conclusions. It is merely speculation to define it as a narrative or as a myth. If you define the information as an "account" rather than a "myth" validity is restored to centrism and gives proper balance to any biased belief that may be expressed by an editor.

Thank you.