Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jerm: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:34, 9 September 2016 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,613 editsm Signing comment by 66.38.71.69 - "→Edits: new section"← Previous edit Revision as of 01:37, 9 September 2016 edit undoJerm (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,667 edits →Edits: rNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
It is a disputable idea that Creation is a narrative. There are many great scientists that would conclude that the Creation account seems most accurate for the findings they have from the material in which they have studied that have lead them to their conclusions. It is merely speculation to define it as a narrative or as a myth. If you define the information as an "account" rather than a "myth" validity is restored to centrism and gives proper balance to any biased belief that may be expressed by an editor. It is a disputable idea that Creation is a narrative. There are many great scientists that would conclude that the Creation account seems most accurate for the findings they have from the material in which they have studied that have lead them to their conclusions. It is merely speculation to define it as a narrative or as a myth. If you define the information as an "account" rather than a "myth" validity is restored to centrism and gives proper balance to any biased belief that may be expressed by an editor.


Thank you. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 01:33, 9 September 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> Thank you. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="auto signed">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 01:33, 9 September 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:] Despite your argument, sourced content is more reliable that your beliefs per ]. If you're going to continue to dispute this, go to the article's talk page and do it. Otherwise, stop removing sourced content. — ] (]) 01:37, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:37, 9 September 2016

This is Jerm's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Edits

It is a disputable idea that Creation is a narrative. There are many great scientists that would conclude that the Creation account seems most accurate for the findings they have from the material in which they have studied that have lead them to their conclusions. It is merely speculation to define it as a narrative or as a myth. If you define the information as an "account" rather than a "myth" validity is restored to centrism and gives proper balance to any biased belief that may be expressed by an editor.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.38.71.69 (talk) 01:33, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

User:66.38.71.69 Despite your argument, sourced content is more reliable that your beliefs per WP:OR. If you're going to continue to dispute this, go to the article's talk page and do it. Otherwise, stop removing sourced content. — JudeccaXIII (talk) 01:37, 9 September 2016 (UTC)