Revision as of 17:57, 1 February 2015 editGuerillero (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators26,384 edits blank← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:21, 24 October 2016 edit undoKs0stm (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators25,727 edits fix | ||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*To report a violation of an Arbitration decision, see ]. | *To report a violation of an Arbitration decision, see ]. | ||
*To request the assistance of an arbitration clerk, see ].}} | *To request the assistance of an arbitration clerk, see ].}} | ||
{{Casenav|case name=GamerGate|clerk1=Ks0stm|clerk2=Sphilbrick|draft arb=Roger Davies|draft arb2=Beeblebrox|active=14|inactive=5|recused=0||}} | {{Casenav|case name=GamerGate|clerk1=Ks0stm|clerk2=Sphilbrick|draft arb=Roger Davies|draft arb2=Beeblebrox|draft arb3=David Fuchs|active=14|inactive=5|recused=0||}} | ||
__NOINDEX__ | __NOINDEX__ | ||
{{ombox |image=] |text= This page has been ]. <!-- Template:Courtesy blanked --> | {{ombox |image=] |text= This page has been ]. The contents of this page can be viewed in the . <!-- Template:Courtesy blanked --> | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 03:21, 24 October 2016
This case is now closed and pages relating to it may no longer be watched
|
Case clerks: Ks0stm (Talk) & Sphilbrick (Talk) Drafting arbitrators: Roger Davies (Talk) & Beeblebrox (Talk) & David Fuchs (Talk)
Misplaced Pages Arbitration |
---|
Open proceedings |
Active sanctions |
Arbitration Committee |
Audit
|
Track related changes |
Behaviour on this page: Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator or clerk, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behavior during a case may also be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision.
This page has been blanked as a courtesy. The contents of this page can be viewed in the page history. |