Misplaced Pages

Biopunk: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:48, 2 November 2016 editFixuture (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users26,899 edits Description: -bold, +newlines in quote← Previous edit Revision as of 15:32, 2 November 2016 edit undoJytdog (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers187,951 edits Undid revision 747415067 by Fixuture (talk) you cannot copy/paste out of a source, and that is not a great source. Please see your Talk page.Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{About|dystopian science fiction genre|real-life citizen science and advocacy movement|Do-it-yourself biology}} {{About|dystopian science fiction genre|real-life citizen science and advocacy movement|Do-it-yourself biology}}


'''Biopunk''' (a ] of "]" and "]") is a ] of ] that focuses on biotechnology. It is derived from ], but focuses on the implications of biotechnology rather than ].<ref name="Quinion 1997">{{cite journal| author = Quinion, Michael| title = World Wide Words: Biopunk| year = 1997 | url = http://www.worldwidewords.org/turnsofphrase/tp-bio3.htm| accessdate=2007-01-26}}</ref> Biopunk is concerned with ]. It is derived of cyberpunk involving ], biotech ]s, and oppressive government agencies that ] ]. Most often keeping with the dark atmosphere of cyberpunk, biopunk generally examines the dark side of ] and represents the low side of ]. Common ideas of this subgenre are biotechnologies in the context of the ], the value and nature of life and humanity, ], misusage of biotechnologies for ] and profit.<ref>http://bestsciencefictionbooks.com/biopunk-science-fiction.php</ref> '''Biopunk''' (a ] of "]" and "]") is a ] of ] that focuses on biotechnology. It is derived from ], but focuses on the implications of biotechnology rather than ].<ref name="Quinion 1997">{{cite journal| author = Quinion, Michael| title = World Wide Words: Biopunk| year = 1997 | url = http://www.worldwidewords.org/turnsofphrase/tp-bio3.htm| accessdate=2007-01-26}}</ref> Biopunk is concerned with ]. It is derived of cyberpunk involving ], biotech ]s, and oppressive government agencies that ] ]. Most often keeping with the dark atmosphere of cyberpunk, biopunk generally examines the dark side of ] and represents the low side of ]. Common ideas of this subgenre are biotechnologies in the context of the ].


==Description== ==Description==

Revision as of 15:32, 2 November 2016

This article is about dystopian science fiction genre. For real-life citizen science and advocacy movement, see Do-it-yourself biology.

Biopunk (a portmanteau of "biotechnology" and "punk") is a subgenre of science fiction that focuses on biotechnology. It is derived from cyberpunk, but focuses on the implications of biotechnology rather than information technology. Biopunk is concerned with synthetic biology. It is derived of cyberpunk involving bio-hackers, biotech mega-corporations, and oppressive government agencies that manipulate human DNA. Most often keeping with the dark atmosphere of cyberpunk, biopunk generally examines the dark side of genetic engineering and represents the low side of biotechnology. Common ideas of this subgenre are biotechnologies in the context of the gap between the rich and poor.

Description

Cover of Ribofunk by Paul Di Filippo, a seminal biopunk story collection.

Biopunk (science fiction) is a subgenre closely related to cyberpunk that focuses on the near-future (most often unintended) consequences of the biotechnology revolution following the discovery of recombinant DNA. Biopunk stories explore the struggles of individuals or groups, often the product of human experimentation, against a typically dystopian backdrop of totalitarian governments and megacorporations which misuse biotechnologies as means of social control and profiteering. Unlike cyberpunk, it builds not on information technology, but on synthetic biology. Like in postcyberpunk fiction, individuals are usually modified and enhanced not with cyberware, but by genetic manipulation. A common feature of biopunk fiction is the "black clinic", which is a laboratory, clinic, or hospital that performs illegal, unregulated, or ethically-dubious biological modification and genetic engineering procedures. Many features of biopunk fiction have their roots in William Gibson's Neuromancer, one of the first cyberpunk novels.

One of the prominent writers in this field is Paul Di Filippo, though he called his collection of such stories ribofunk, a blend of "ribosome" and "funk". In RIBOFUNK: The Manifesto, Di Filippo wrote:

Why Ribo?
Cybernetics was a dead science when cyberpunk SF was born, a cul-de-sac without living practitioners. Furthermore, the "cyber" prefix has been irreparably debased by overuse, in vehicles ranging from comic books to bad movies. The tag now stands for nothing in the public mind but computer hacking and fanciful cyborgs such as Robocop. And Weiner's actual texts do not provide enough fruitful metaphors for constructing a systematic worldview.
Why Funk?
Punk was a dead music when cyberpunk SF was born, a cul-de-sac albeit with living practitioners who just hadn't gotten the message yet. The music's nihilistic, chiliastic worldview had already culminated in its only possible end: self-extinction.
What is Ribofunk then?
Ribofunk is speculative fiction which acknowledges, is informed by and illustrates the tenet that the next revolution--the only one that really matters--will be in the field of biology. To paraphrase Pope, ribofunk holds that: "The proper study of mankind is life." Forget physics and chemistry; they are only tools to probe living matter. Computers? Merely simulators and modelers for life. The cell is King!

Di Filippo argues that precursors of ribofunk fiction include H. G. Wells' The Island of Doctor Moreau; Julian Huxley's The Tissue Culture King; some of David H. Keller's stories, Damon Knight's Natural State and Other Stories; Frederik Pohl and Cyril M. Kornbluth's Gravy Planet; novels of T. J. Bass and John Varley; Greg Bear's Blood Music and Bruce Sterling's Schismatrix.

See also

References

  1. ^ Quinion, Michael (1997). "World Wide Words: Biopunk". Retrieved 2007-01-26. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  2. Pulver, David L. (1998). GURPS Bio-Tech. Steve Jackson Games. ISBN 1-55634-336-1.
  3. Paul Taylor. "Fleshing Out the Maelstrom: Biopunk and the Violence of Information". Journal of Media and Culture.
  4. Fisher, Jeffrey (1996). "Ribofunk". Retrieved 2007-01-26. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  5. ^ Di Filippo, Paul (1998). "RIBOFUNK: The Manifesto". Retrieved 2011-01-05. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

External links

Cyberpunk
List of cyberpunk works
Contributors
Subcultures
Themes
Derivative genres
Science fiction
Outline
Subgenres
Cyberpunk derivatives
Culture
Region
Awards
Cinematic
Literary, art,
and audio
Multimedia
Media
Film
Literature
Stage
Television
Themes
Architectural
Biological
Physical
Psychological
Social
Technological
Religious
Related
Categories: