Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 12:06, 12 September 2006

User:C56C added something to the User:Cberlet section . I am not sure if that is supposed to happen. Intangible 21:59, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Intangible and recategorization of hundreds of pages

User:Intangible is in the process of recategorizing hundreds of pages, despite the fact that Intangible is in arbitration over this very issue. I have asked for a temporary injunction, See:request for injunction. I raise this here because so many pages are being edited, and I felt someone should at least glance at what is going on and decide if it is OK or not. I am obviously biased, and think the recategorization is POV, idiosyncratic, and ultimately destuctive of the work of scores of editors.--Cberlet 12:41, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

I agree. I've been noticing this the last couple days and have been reverting a number of these edits by Intangible. But I also am highly biased in this situation and I would also like a 3rd party to review these actions. The Ungovernable Force 20:40, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Back in a few weeks

I need to take a break from Misplaced Pages. Back in early September. It is very frustrating to go to all the work of presenting an arbitration case, and watch while User:Intangible essentially ignores the process and makes hundreds of dubious POV edits. I think the case for a temporary injuction is a strong one. I realize that administrators are overworked and some are attending the Wiki meeting. So I think it is better if I just walk away from this whole mess and cool off for a few weeks. --Cberlet 02:53, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Response to Intangible's claims

For User:WGee, his double standard was also noted by another editor .

It should be noted that the aforementioned editor, SandyGeorgia, was not invloved in the article at all. Moreover, she has a history of content disputes with me in the Hugo Chávez article. This is relevant because it indicates that she is not a neutral commentator.

This 'double standard' is examplified by the comment of User:WGee at the talk page of the Québec Solidaire article.

Not only did Intangible misconstrue my comment in the first place, but he has chosen to ignore my precise clarification of it: .

Furthermore, User:WGee has simply removed edits by another user User:Fastifex . I originally provided a source for my edit on the talk page here: .

Indeed I did remove the edits. Additions to Misplaced Pages are not "true until proven false"; so I don't understand why Intangible is trying to use my removal of these edits against me. No source was provided for them orginally, so I exercised my duty to remove original research from Misplaced Pages. Although Intangible did provide a source sometime later asserting that all Communist states are/were "totalitarian" (a word frequently misapplied), it was merely an opinionative essay; and certainly the assertions made in one essay cannot be regarded as fact. In addition, Intangible's source did not address this part Fastifex's edit: ". . .embracing market reforms isn't necessarily coupled with as much socio-political liberalisation, they may remain authoritarian." Not only is that a moot assertion, but it's written in a horrible standard of English.

--WGee 19:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

evidence by User:Tazmaniacs

This is not really structured. I am not sure how I can reply to this. Some are not even assertions made by User:Tazmaniacs. Intangible 22:25, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

gone

I'll be gone drinking some tequilas in the sun. Back in september. Intangible 17:11, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Active Arbitration?

Do we wait for Intangible to check back in?--Cberlet 02:02, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Does anyone know when/if Intangible is rejoining Wiki?--Cberlet 16:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

And under what username ?

I trust that enough data has been saved from his edits to verify suspected sockpuppets. --LucVerhelst 12:06, 12 September 2006 (UTC)