| Revision as of 21:59, 15 December 2016 editTerabar (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users681 edits →Comments by other users← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:00, 15 December 2016 edit undoBbb23 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators270,148 editsm Reverted edits by Terabar (talk) to last version by Zanhe - stop pinging usNext edit → | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
| *Agree with Terabar. Capitals00 and D4iNa4 work together to a highly unusual degree. Check out their : neither account is very active: Capitals00 with 858 edits and D4iNa4 with 643, but fully 460 of their combined edits occur on the same pages, frequently working in tandem during edit disputes, and as the diffs show, many of their edits are virtually identical. Both accounts have been blocked before for similar pattern of disruptive editing. Capitals00 has also had a sock blocked before (]), and he's probably learned from the experience to operate the new sock via a proxy or VPN to evade CheckUser detection. -] (]) 20:18, 15 December 2016 (UTC) | *Agree with Terabar. Capitals00 and D4iNa4 work together to a highly unusual degree. Check out their : neither account is very active: Capitals00 with 858 edits and D4iNa4 with 643, but fully 460 of their combined edits occur on the same pages, frequently working in tandem during edit disputes, and as the diffs show, many of their edits are virtually identical. Both accounts have been blocked before for similar pattern of disruptive editing. Capitals00 has also had a sock blocked before (]), and he's probably learned from the experience to operate the new sock via a proxy or VPN to evade CheckUser detection. -] (]) 20:18, 15 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
| ::Thanks ] for clarification. ] and ], don't you have to say something about above clarification and interpretation? ] (]) 21:58, 15 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== | ====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== | ||
Revision as of 22:00, 15 December 2016
Capitals00
Capitals00 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Capitals00/Archive.
13 December 2016
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets
- D4iNa4 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
User: D4iNa4 and User: Capitals00 are actually one person and is using his/her ids inappropriately from a long time. And they both were blocked previously for using multiple accounts. See here and here. Sockpuppet investigation was launched many times by different users time to time. User:Zanhe also reported the same thing few months ago but was later ignored. Here I would like to present the same edits used by these two ids pushing their propaganda.
- Template:Criticism of religion sidebar: D4iNa4 ; ;; Capitals00 ; ; ; .
- Dalit Buddhist Movement: D4iNa4 ; ; Capitals00 ; .
Now he is again back reverting with using his two ids on List of converts to Islam from Hinduism
User: Zanhe also reported the same thing here but was later ignored. I am pasting Zanhe's report also for further ease in investigation.
- Reported by Zanhe
- Slavery and religion: Capitals00 ; D4iNa4
- Cho La incident: Capitals00 ; D4iNa4
- Indo-Pakistani War of 1947: Capitals00 ; D4iNa4
- WP:Articles for deletion/Battle of Batapur: Capitals00 voted delete with very similar wording to D4iNa4's AfD nomination.
These two ids have been using different ids inappropriately and were blocked previously. I further request you to look into this matter. Please ! Terabar (talk) 17:15, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- Agree with Terabar. Capitals00 and D4iNa4 work together to a highly unusual degree. Check out their user compare report: neither account is very active: Capitals00 with 858 edits and D4iNa4 with 643, but fully 460 of their combined edits occur on the same pages, frequently working in tandem during edit disputes, and as the diffs show, many of their edits are virtually identical. Both accounts have been blocked before for similar pattern of disruptive editing. Capitals00 has also had a sock blocked before (User:OwnDealers), and he's probably learned from the experience to operate the new sock via a proxy or VPN to evade CheckUser detection. -Zanhe (talk) 20:18, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
In November 2015, Mike V found these two accounts to be 
Unlikely. With the lapse of time, I would go slightly further and say they are very Unlikely. Closing with no action.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:52, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- User:Bbb23, thanks for your comment. But can't you see that these two accounts are supporting each other's edits and are acting like meatpuppets? Don't you think that they are connected offline? Terabar (talk) 19:11, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- User:Mike V, can you look into this matter again? Terabar (talk) 00:15, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Categories: